News & Analysis as of

Board of Directors Shareholders Professional Liability

Allen Matkins

Is This The Case That Ate Delaware Corporate Law?

Allen Matkins on

In a recent feature published by the Washington Legal Foundation, UCLA Professor Stephen Bainbridge casts a jaundiced eye toward Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster's recent ruling in In re McDonald's Corp. Stockholder Deriv....more

Allen Matkins

Officer Exculpation Is Old News And Automatic In This State

Allen Matkins on

Delaware's decision last summer to amend Section 102(b)(7) to permit the exculpation of certain officers for direct (but not derivative) stockholder suits for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty is attracting a...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

In the Boardroom With Resnick and Fuller - Episode 1

Fox Rothschild LLP on

A podcast series in collaboration with PLUS, the Professional Liability Underwriting Society. Episode One Resnick and Fuller focus on two shareholder lawsuits that illustrate the impact of COVID on the responsibilities of...more

Allen Matkins

Delaware Now Authorizes Exculpation Of Officers, But On What Basis?

Allen Matkins on

Effective August 1, 2022, Delaware amended Section 102(b)(7) of its General Corporation Law to allow a Delaware corporation to include in its certificate of incorporation a provision exculpating certain of its officers. ...more

Allen Matkins

Is Alter Ego Coming To A City Or Town Near You?

Allen Matkins on

Historically, the alter ego doctrine has been applied to hold a shareholder or shareholders liable for the claims made against the corporation.  In general, two requirements must be met for the doctrine to be applied.  First,...more

Mintz

Director Liability for Cybersecurity Risks

Mintz on

If a corporation is the target of a cyberattack resulting in a data breach, its board may be the target of a shareholder derivative action claiming breach of fiduciary duty. A recent example is Palkon v. Holmes, No....more

Allen Matkins

California Dividend Statutes Found To Preempt Common Law Claims

Allen Matkins on

Chapter 5 of the California Corporations Code imposes specific limitations on “distributions to shareholders”, a term defined in Corporations Code section 166. Directors who approve the making of any distribution to...more

Bracewell LLP

Delaware Court Clarifies Director and Officer Liability in M&A Transactions

Bracewell LLP on

In Chen v. Howard-Anderson, 87 A.3d 648 (Del. Ch. 2014), the Delaware Court of Chancery (Laster, V.C.) held that directors and officers can be held liable for their participation in a change-of-control transaction if their...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Delaware Court of Chancery Underscores Heightened Pleading Standard Necessary to Support a Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty In...

In Houseman v. Sagerman, C.A. No. 8898-VCG, 2014 WL 1478511 (Del. Ch. Apr. 16, 2014), the Delaware Court of Chancery (Glasscock, V.C.) granted, in part, a motion to dismiss filed by certain directors and the financial advisor...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Poison Pills with Lower Ownership Thresholds for Activist Investors Come Under Attack

On March 25, 2014, Daniel Loeb’s Third Point LLC filed suit against Sotheby’s and its directors in Delaware’s Court of Chancery to invalidate Sotheby’s poison pill. The board of Sotheby’s adopted the poison pill this past...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Who’s in Charge – Is the Board Responsible to Monitor Its Financial Advisor or Vice Versa?

McDermott Will & Emery on

In the case of In re Rural Metro Corporation Stockholders Litigation, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware held that the primary financial advisor retained by Rural/Metro Corporation aided and abetted the board in...more

McAfee & Taft

Concurrent ‘Alter-Ego’ Claims: Oklahoma Leads the Nation in Extending Protection to Shareholders, Officers and Directors

McAfee & Taft on

During the past several years, practitioners have devoted significant attention to the fate of the Oklahoma Legislature’s efforts at, and the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s response to, legislative tort reform. However, few noticed...more

Smith Anderson

North Carolina Business Court Holds that Shareholders Cannot Directly Sue Officers and Directors in Merger Challenge

Smith Anderson on

A recent decision by the North Carolina Business Court potentially makes it more difficult for shareholders to challenge mergers and acquisitions in North Carolina. The Court held that an action against a company’s officers...more

Brooks Pierce

Don't Sue A North Carolina Board Of Directors Over A Merger Without Reading This Case

Brooks Pierce on

Last week's Order in Gusinsky v. Flanders Corp., 2013 NCBC 46, should be required reading for lawyers thinking of suing the directors of a corporation in North Carolina over a merger transaction. It provides guidance on the...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide