News & Analysis as of

Contract of Adhesion Arbitration Agreements

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: April 2019

Payne & Fears on

This month's key employment law cases address the enforcement of arbitration agreements. Diaz v. Sohnen Enters., 34 Cal. App. 5th 126, 245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2019) Summary:  When employee continues his or her employment...more

Kilpatrick

Ninth Circuit upholds arbitration provision testing the “outer limits” of what constitutes an enforceable arbitration agreement

Kilpatrick on

Takeaway: Adhesion contracts are ubiquitous in modern internet commerce, and the rules of contract formation are generally the same for paper and on-line contracts. Parties are generally bound by terms and conditions...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Supreme Court Enforces Arbitration Clauses for Business Customers in Consumer Class Action

Bennett Jones LLP on

Business customers that agreed to arbitrate disputes cannot “piggyback” their claims onto a consumer class action in court, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled....more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: July 2018

Payne & Fears on

This month’s key California employment law cases are from the California Supreme Court and from the California Court of Appeal. Troester v. Starbucks Corp., 235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 820 (2018) - Summary: Employer that requires...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Chris Lazarini Analyzes Right to Jury Under Section 4 of Federal Arbitration Act

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

Bass, Berry & Sims Chris Lazarini analyzed a case outlining when a party is entitled to have a jury decide issues related to the making or enforceability of an arbitration agreement. ...more

Morgan Lewis

New Jersey Rejects Contractual Shortening of Limitations Period

Morgan Lewis on

The New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision forbids employers from contractually shortening the two-year limitations period under the state’s Law Against Discrimination. In a decision issued on June 15 that reversed two...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Statute of Limitations for New Jersey Law Against Discrimination Claims Cannot Be Shortened By Contract

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Supreme Court of New Jersey rules that employers may not shorten the statute of limitations for claims of discrimination under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination via private contract. The...more

McManis Faulkner

Carbajal v. CWPSC Decision Provides Guidance for Drafting Employment Arbitration Agreements

McManis Faulkner on

On February 26, 2016, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, issued its decision in Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc., invalidating an employment arbitration agreement due to a number of provisions the Court considered...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Employment Law - March 2016 #3

New EEOC Suits: Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation Violates Title VII - Why it matters - The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a pair of landmark lawsuits alleging sex discrimination based...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Recent Maverick Ruling in CA Appellate Court Finds Concepcion Does Not Overrule Gentry

Although the U.S. Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion found that the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California’s Discover Bank rule, which invalidated class action waivers in arbitration agreements in consumer...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide