News & Analysis as of

Delivery Drivers

Perkins Coie

California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22

Perkins Coie on

The California Supreme Court issued its decision in Castellanos v. State (Castellanos) on July 25, 2024, ruling Proposition 22 (Prop 22), the initiative that allows businesses to classify drivers for app-based transportation...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

California’s Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22 Allowing Gig Workers To Be Classified As Independent Contractors

Amundsen Davis LLC on

On July 25, 2024, CaliforniaCalifornia’s Supreme Court issued a highly anticipated ruling that allows app-based rideshare and delivery companies to classify drivers as independent contractors instead of employees, if certain...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Court Upholds Law Classifying App-Based Drivers as Independent Contractors: Does What Happens in California, Stay in California?

McGlinchey Stafford on

The California Supreme Court recently upheld a California law that classifies drivers for app-based transportation companies, such as Uber, Lyft, or DoorDash, as independent contractors and not employees, provided the company...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court of California Upholds Law Classifying App-Based Drivers as Independent Contractors

On July 25, 2024, the Supreme Court of California upheld a state law permitting ride-sharing apps to continue classifying their drivers as independent contractors, rather than employees. ...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Proposition 22 Survives: App-Based Rideshare and Delivery Companies May Continue to Properly Classify Drivers as Independent...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In a substantial win for app-based rideshare and delivery companies, the California Supreme Court unanimously upheld California Proposition 22 as constitutional on July 25, 2024. California Ballot Initiative Proposition 22...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22: What It Means for Gig Economy Workers and Companies

CDF Labor Law LLP on

Last week, on July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court in Castellanos v. State of California unanimously upheld Proposition 22, the 2020 ballot measure that allows gig economy businesses like Uber and Lyft to legally...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

California Supreme Court Delivers Big Win for Gig Companies

On July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Proposition 22, the law allowing gig economy workers to be classified as independent contractors. The decision ends a nearly four-year legal...more

Epstein Becker & Green

The Gig Continues: California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22

Epstein Becker & Green on

On July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Castellanos et al., v. State of California and Protect App-Based Drivers and Services, et al., upholding the 2020 voter initiative known as...more

Littler

California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22

Littler on

After years of litigation, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 22, a voter-approved law allowing app-based drivers to work as independent contractors. The Court rejected a challenge by a group of labor unions,...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22 as Constitutional

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Castellanos v. State of California centered on the constitutionality of Proposition 22, the “Protect App-Based Drivers and Services Act,” which allowed app-based rideshare and delivery companies to hire drivers as independent...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Ninth Circuit Continues to Expand Transportation Worker Exemption Under Federal Arbitration Act

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Courts are finding more workers who do not physically transport goods or people across state lines to be transportation workers exempt from arbitrating their claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The U.S. Court of...more

BakerHostetler

5th Circuit: Motor Carrier Act Applies to Intrastate Transport of Goods in the Flow of Interstate Commerce

BakerHostetler on

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires that employers pay certain employees one-and-a-half times their regular rate of pay for any hours they work over 40 in a workweek. There are, however, several exemptions from the...more

Littler

Forthcoming Additions and Modifications to Employment Laws in Colorado

Littler on

The 2024 Colorado legislative session has concluded and resulted in several new laws affecting Colorado employers. This Insight provides an overview of some significant changes....more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

California’s AB 5 Survives Ninth Circuit Review

California’s Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) doesn’t violate federal or state Equal Protection clauses, the en banc Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has determined. The dispute dates back to 2019, when the state legislature...more

Maison Law

California Uber Accidents and Personal Injury Claims

Maison Law on

Uber is a California-born taxi service that relies upon apps on tablets, smartphones, and computers. Requests for service come with a few finger taps rather than hailing for cabs or competing with other taxi riders for...more

Marshall Dennehey

Sixth Circuit Discredits IRS Mileage Rate as Sufficient Payment to Employee Drivers Under the FLSA

Marshall Dennehey on

Parker v. Battle Creek Pizza, Inc. & Bradford v. Team Pizza, Inc., Nos. 22-2119/3561 (6th Cir. Mar. 12, 2024) (not yet reported) - The Sixth Circuit recently considered a consolidated appeal regarding how delivery drivers...more

Cozen O'Connor

Cozen Cities - June 5, 2024

Cozen O'Connor on

BALTIMORE — Visiting Tech Companies Want to Expand Baltimore Presence- The latest Techstars Equitech Accelerator brought several innovative companies to Baltimore, with founders expressing their commitment to expanding...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Supreme Court: Look to Worker, Not Employer for FAA Exemption Status

Is the exemption from coverage under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) for any “class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” limited to workers whose employers are in the transportation industry? ...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Recent Court Rulings on FAA’s Transportation Worker Exemption May Require Employers to Update Their Arbitration Agreements

The U.S. Department of Labor estimates 56 percent of all nonunion private-sector employees are subject to mandatory arbitration agreements. Many employers use such agreements—and the class action waivers contained therein—to...more

Kaufman & Canoles

K&C Sports & Entertainment Law Weekly Roundup - May 2024 #3

Kaufman & Canoles on

The parents of a Gainesville, Georgia high school baseball player who died after he was hit in the head at baseball practice have filed a lawsuit against the school system and his coaches....more

Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires &...

New York Workers' Compensation Ruling Roundup - May 2024

Two new Appellate Division cases were released on Thursday, May 16, 2024, involving New York Workers’ Compensation....more

Epstein Becker & Green

Employees Not in the Transportation Industry Can Be Exempted From Arbitration Under the FAA

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that in determining exemption from the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) for “workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” — commonly referred to as the “transportation worker”...more

Clark Hill PLC

The Learned Concierge - May 2024, Vol. 8

Clark Hill PLC on

The Learned Concierge - Welcome to your monthly legal insights on the trends impacting the Retail, Hospitality, and Food & Beverage Industries....more

Husch Blackwell LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Decision Reshapes FAA Exemption for Transportation Workers

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In a unanimous ruling earlier this month, the Supreme Court in Bissonnette, et al., v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC, et al., 601 U.S. ----144 S.Ct. 905 (2024) held that transportation workers need not work for a company in...more

Littler

Ninth Circuit: “Transportation Exemption” Does Not Apply to Arbitration Clauses Between Corporate Entities or in Commercial...

Littler on

Two days before the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC, that the Federal Arbitration Act’s (FAA) transportation worker exemption (meaning the FAA would not apply) extends beyond...more

412 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 17

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide