News & Analysis as of

Discrimination › Religious Discrimination › UT Southwestern Medical v Nassar

Discrimination is prejudicial treatment related to (or inappropriate consideration of) an individual's actual or perceived membership in a particular class, group or category, such as an individual's... more +
Discrimination is prejudicial treatment related to (or inappropriate consideration of) an individual's actual or perceived membership in a particular class, group or category, such as an individual's race, religion, gender, age, to name a few.  less -
Cozen O'Connor

Labor And Employment Observer - 2013/2014

Cozen O'Connor on

In This Issue: Message from the Chair; Social Media and the Workplace: 2013 and Beyond; Unpaid Internships: Training Ground or Legal Landmine?; Supreme Court’s Nassar Decision Sets Higher Causation Standard for a...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

California Employment Law Notes - July 2013

Proskauer Rose LLP on

Employee Must Prove That Illegal Retaliation Was The "But For" Cause Of Adverse Job Action Under Title VII - University of Tex. S.W. Med. Ctr. v. Nassar, 570 U.S. ___, 2013 WL 3155234 (2013) - The United States...more

BakerHostetler

Employees Must Prove Retaliation Was “But-For” Cause of Employment Action

BakerHostetler on

Employers are well aware that poorly performing employees may lodge baseless retaliation claims as a smokescreen to interfere with legitimate discipline....more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Employment Law -- Jul 03, 2013

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on

Excerpt from Supreme Court Sides With Employers in Title VII Suits - Capping off a term of big decisions with employer-friendly results, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed in on two major employment issues in a pair of...more

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects the Mixed-Motive Analysis in Retaliation Claims

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation on

The U.S. Supreme Court held on Monday that a plaintiff alleging retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) must prove that retaliation was the “but-for” reason for an adverse employment...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Employers Prevail In Two U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

Pierce Atwood LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued two closely watched decisions Monday affecting Title VII cases....more

FordHarrison

Legal Alert: Supreme Court Sets Heightened Standard For Proving Retaliation Claims

FordHarrison on

On June 24, 2013, the United States Supreme Court heightened the burden of proof for employees bringing retaliation claims under Title VII by holding that employees have to prove that the employer's desire to retaliate was...more

BakerHostetler

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Loosen Causation Standards for Employee Retaliation Claims in University of Texas Southwestern...

BakerHostetler on

On June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court rejected a lower standard of proof for employee retaliation claims under Title VII, finding that a lower causation standard could tempt poorly performing employees to file frivolous claims...more

Littler

Too Little, Too Late: The Supreme Court Adopts But-For Causation for Title VII Retaliation Claims

Littler on

On June 24, 2013, in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, 570 U.S. ___ (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court broke its long string of pronouncing expansive standards in the context of Title VII retaliation...more

Morgan Lewis

Supreme Court Issues Two Important Title VII Opinions

Morgan Lewis on

Divided Court holds that a "supervisor" must be empowered to take tangible employment actions for vicarious liability under Title VII to apply and that Title VII retaliation claims are subject to a higher "but-for" causation...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

Supreme Court Adopts "But For" Causation Standard for Title VII Retaliation Claims

Proskauer Rose LLP on

On June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that a plaintiff in a Title VII retaliation case must prove that the retaliation was the "but for" cause of the employer's adverse action. University of Texas S.W. Med. Ctr. v....more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court Holds “But For” Standard of Proof Applies; Big Implications for Retaliation Cases

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

In another big win for employers today, the Supreme Court ruled that Title VII retaliation cases must be proved by a “but for” standard of proof, not a lower standard that had been used in various courts before....more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide