News & Analysis as of

Individual Mandate › Oral Argument

The term "Individual Mandate" typically refers to a requirement under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 that all United States residents must obtain "minimum essential... more +
The term "Individual Mandate" typically refers to a requirement under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 that all United States residents must obtain "minimum essential healthcare coverage" unless they qualify for one of eight exemptions under the Act.  The Act defines "minimum essential coverage" and levies penalties against individuals who fail to comply with the mandate.    less -
White and Williams LLP

US Supreme Court’s Oral Argument in California v. Texas: Reports of the Affordable Care Act’s Demise May be Greatly Exaggerated

White and Williams LLP on

This alert is Part 2 of a three-part series where White and Williams will examine the United States Supreme Court case, California v. Texas. Part 1 examined the case in full and how the decision in the case will affect the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

SCOTUS Watch: The ACA and Key Health Law Areas Justice Barrett Could Impact - Diagnosing Health Care Podcast

Epstein Becker & Green on

Oral arguments in California v. Texas offer a glimpse at how the Supreme Court might rule in deciding the fate of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). Attorneys Stuart Gerson and Tim Murphy also look at what Justice Amy Coney...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Healthcare, Biologics, and Severability: Will the ACA—and the BPCIA—Survive the Latest Challenge?

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry on

The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“BPCIA”) is looking alive and well after last week’s Supreme Court oral argument on the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). If you didn’t realize the BPCIA was at issue...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Future of Biosimilars at Issue in Latest Supreme Court Affordable Care Act Case

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

On Tuesday, November 10, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in California v. Texas, a challenge to the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) brought by Republican Attorneys General and the Trump Administration. ...more

BakerHostetler

2020 Supreme Court Update

BakerHostetler on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s October term started earlier this month, and promises to be an unprecedented session. How is the Court responding to the pandemic and adapting to a virtual environment? Which cases should you be...more

K&L Gates LLP

K&L Gates Triage: Eye on Election 2020: California v. Texas and the Future of the Affordable Care Act

K&L Gates LLP on

In this episode, Rebecca Schaefer and Victoria Hamscho provide an update on next month’s Supreme Court oral arguments in California v. Texas, a case in which the Court will be reviewing the constitutionality of key parts of...more

Foley Hoag LLP

California v. Texas, the New Supreme Court, and the Future of the Affordable Care Act

Foley Hoag LLP on

On November 10, 2020, the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hold oral argument in California v. Texas (Dkt. No. 19-840), a case in which the Trump administration and several Republican-led states have asked the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

SCOTUS Wrapup and Preview 2020

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

In this episode, recorded on Sept. 14, Akin Gump Supreme Court and appellate practice co-head Pratik Shah returns to review the 2019 Supreme Court Term and preview the big cases and topics in the October 2020 Term. Among...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Fifth Circuit Issues ACA Ruling, But Severability Question Remains

McDermott Will & Emery on

A decision in Texas v. United States was issued by a divided three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on December 18, 2019. This case presented once again the question whether the Affordable Care Act...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Update to Texas v. United States: DOJ Files a Brief in Support of Eliminating the ACA

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On May 1, 2019, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed an initial brief (the “Brief”) with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the “Fifth Circuit”) on behalf of the United States, in favor of upholding the lower...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Supreme Court Case Does Not Directly Challenge Obamacare, But Could Lead to Its Implosion.

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on

The media coverage in the run-up to today’s Supreme Court oral arguments in King v. Burwell has described King as an attack on Obamacare. That isn’t quite right. Understandably, some of the imprecise language is due to the...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide