News & Analysis as of

Infringement Trade Dress

Lathrop GPM

Federal Circuit Reverses Preliminary Injunction on Franchisor’s Patent and Trade Dress Infringement Claim

Lathrop GPM on

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a preliminary injunction granted as to franchisor Urban Air’s patent and trade dress infringement claims against Kangaroo, LLC. UATP IP, LLC v. Kangaroo, LLC, 2024 WL 658205 (Fed....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

In-N-Out Burger Trade Dress Dispute Part II: Where’s The Beef?

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Last week we introduced our readers to the imbroglio featuring the burger behemoth In-N-Out, who accused upstart Doll N’ Burgers of infringing In-N-Out’s registered and unregistered trade dress. Typical of these sorts of...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

In-N-Out Trade Dress Dispute: Court Finds Alleged Flaws in Survey Evidence a “Nothing Burger”

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

A burger brouhaha involving the Lanham Act is well underway in the Wolverine state. Plaintiff In-N-Out Burgers operates hundreds of fast food joints in the West. Defendant Doll n’ Burger recently opened two locations in...more

Quarles & Brady LLP

Dr. Martens Kicks Infringers to the Curb

Quarles & Brady LLP on

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California recently determined that the owner of the iconic Dr. Martens trade dress—a famous design that has been used for more than three decades—was entitled to a...more

Snell & Wilmer

Trade Dress: What It Is and How to Protect It

Snell & Wilmer on

I. Trade Dress Is Either a Trademark or Service Mark. “Trade dress” functions as either a trademark or service mark. A “trademark” is any word, term, phase, symbol, logo, design, shape, tag line, background, color, scent,...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Doc Martens Gives the Boot to Likelihood of Confusion Expert in Trade Dress Dust-Up

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

We’ve discussed a number of cases lately where flimsy consumer surveys were tossed out as unreliable under Daubert. This latest installment presents a slightly different twist....more

Hogan Lovells

9th Circuit swivels on trade dress functionality doctrine in favor of iconic Herman Miller office chairs

Hogan Lovells on

The Ninth Circuit rules in favor of furniture designer Herman Miller in its trade dress infringement suit against a copycat manufacturer of knockoff Eames and Aeron office chairs. The court affirms a jury finding that the...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

A Tale of Two Cookies: Third Circuit Dunks Cookie Stick Trade Dress Claims

In a recent decision, Ezaki Glico v. Lotte International American Corporation, the Third Circuit rejected a manufacturer’s claims of trade dress infringement regarding Pocky, a chocolate covered cookie stick which Ezaki Glico...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Overcoming Intellectual Property Exclusions In Insurance Policies

A key challenge for policyholders seeking coverage under commercial general liability, directors and officers and other insurance policies is the presence of the so-called “intellectual property exclusion.” In a typical...more

McCarter & English, LLP

The Third Circuit Shares Some Food For Thought On The Bounds Of Trade Dress Protection

McCarter & English, LLP on

The overall look of a product – including the look of a snack or a treat – may be entitled to intellectual property protection as “trade dress.” But the protection of the overall look of a product as trade dress is neither...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Despite Amarin, ITC May Be Right Prescription For Pharma

Foreign-made drugs, nutritional supplements and medical devices imported into the United States with false or misleading labeling or designed to look like an established competing product in violation of the Lanham Act could...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

“Sleevey Wonders” are “Arm Tight” in California Lawsuit

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The women’s hosiery powerhouse, Spanx, is being sued for allegedly copying designs of a small shapewear company (R and A Synergy, LLC, v. Spanx, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2017)). In the Complaint filed on December 21, 2017 in the...more

WilmerHale

The Relevance of Alternative Designs 16 Years After TrafFix

WilmerHale on

In 2001, the Supreme Court in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc. refined its test for determining whether a product design is functional—and thus ineligible for trade dress protection. 532 U.S. 23, 58...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Sweet as Candy? Sugarfina takes Competitor to Court

Robins Kaplan LLP on

On June 15th, Sugarfina Inc. (“Sugarfina”), a gourmet candy boutique, sued one of its competitors, Sweet Pete’s LLC (“Sweet Pete’s”), accusing Sweet Pete’s of trade dress, copyright, trademark, and patent infringement, as...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

A Multi-Layered Approach to Packaging Protection

Ladas & Parry LLP on

The way in which a product looks or how it is packaged and sold can often be a driving force in the consumer’s purchasing decision. Yet, the intellectual property rights available for product designs and packaging are...more

Proskauer - New England IP Blog

Court Throws Out Back Massager Trade Dress Infringement Claims on Motion to Dismiss

As the first-filed paper in nearly any litigation, the complaint is typically subject to rigorous scrutiny from the named defendant to identify any flaws that may dispatch the case via a motion to dismiss. A plaintiff in the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Don’t Let Your Color Trade Dress Protection Fade Away

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in affirming a district court ruling, reaffirmed the availability of trade dress protection for colors, but reiterated that a plaintiff must show that its color trade dress is...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Design Patents and Trade Dress

Womble Bond Dickinson on

I often get asked by clients to discuss the differences between design patents and trade dress. Both are intellectual property protections that protect similar aspects of a product—the appearance and aesthetic features. Last...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Individual Inventor Alleges Eli Lilly and BDA Overdosed on Patented Dosage Adherence Tool

Womble Bond Dickinson on

In the latest chapter of a year-long battle between an individual inventor and two companies, Lisa Duer (“Duer”), a resident of Woodstock, Georgia, filed her Third Amended Complaint alleging patent infringement, trademark...more

Knobbe Martens

Trademark Review | January 2015

Knobbe Martens on

Diageo Enforces Trade Dress Rights in its CROWN ROYAL Drawstring Bag - Diageo owns a registration for the mark CROWN ROYAL for whiskey. Diageo has sold its CROWN ROYAL whiskey in a purple drawstring bag for many...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Python Safety Files Trade Dress and Patent infringement Complaint Against Ty-Flot

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On June 18, 2014, Python Safety, Inc. (“Python”), of Woodstock, GA filed a complaint against Ty-Flot, Inc. (“Ty-Flot”), of Manchester, NH, alleging federal trade dress infringement and unfair competition, infringement of US...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright &...

“Big Chocolate” Gets Injunction Against Whack-A-Mole Senator; Trademark “Services” Include Political Activities

Last week, Judge William Quarles of the District of Maryland issued an injunction preventing Maryland Republican State Senator Steve Hershey from using his own campaign literature. The case was brought by the Hershey...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Trade Dress and the Functionality Doctrine: At the Intersection of Trademark and Patent Law

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Earlier this week, the Fourth Circuit reversed the dismissal of a Lanham Act claim for trade dress infringement involving a pixel pattern embossed on an absorbent textile-like product used in medical supplies, hygiene...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Select Management Seeks Redress From Title Credit Over Use Of "Loan Max" Mark

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On April 1, 2014, Select Management Resources, LLC of Alpharetta, Georgia (“Select”) filed a complaint against Title Credit Acceptance, LLC of Duluth, Georgia (“Title”) alleging state and federal trademark and trade dress...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Trade Dress, Sovereign Immunity, World Politics and R.60 Collide - Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. v. Islamic Republic of Iran,

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the vacatur of final default judgment against the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran) for alleged trade-dress infringement. The unanimous panel agreed with...more

31 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide