News & Analysis as of

Nordstrom Inc. Day of Rest Laws

Fisher Phillips

9th Circuit Puts Mendoza v. Nordstrom Saga To Rest

Fisher Phillips on

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of “day of rest” claims brought by two former hourly employees against retail giant Nordstrom. The court determined that the employees were not...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

And on the Seventh Day, Let Them Rest… or Work—If They Want!

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Last month in Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc., the California Supreme Court addressed three questions about California’s “day of rest” statutes that prohibit employers from causing employees “to work more than...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Mendoza v. Nordstrom – Day Of Rest Rule

The California Supreme Court issued its long awaited ruling in Mendoza v. Nordstrom, in which it clarified California’s so-called “day of rest” rule, which guarantees employees “one day’s rest therefrom in seven,” prohibits...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

California Supreme Court Defines “Day of Rest” Requirements

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc., the Supreme Court resolved three unsettled questions concerning how to read California’s “day of rest” statutes: Employees are entitled to one day of rest during each...more

Nossaman LLP

Rest Assured – California Supreme Court Clarifies What One Day's Rest in Seven Means

Nossaman LLP on

In Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc., the California Supreme Court unanimously ruled that employees are guaranteed one day of rest for each defined workweek. However, an employee may voluntarily decide to work more than six days...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Retail and Consumer Products Law Roundup - May 2017

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Interchange Settlement Appeal - The U.S. Supreme Court denied a request to review the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's ruling overturning a $7.25 billion settlement agreement in...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Employment Law Commentary - May 2017 #2

"On The Seventh Day He (She) Rested"... Maybe - It took 124 years, but the California Supreme Court in Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc., No. S224611, 2017 WL 1833143 (Cal. May 8, 2017) finally addressed in detail California’s...more

Best Best & Krieger LLP

California’s Ambiguous Day of Rest Requirements Clarified by State Supreme Court - Employers Need to Schedule Accordingly

California employees are generally required to be provided one day’s rest in a seven-day work week. (See, Cal. Labor Code sections 551, 552 and 556.) For years, there has been confusion over what it means for employers to...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

“Day of Rest” Requirement Measured By Workweek, Not Every Seven-Day Period

California employers must allow their employees to take one day of rest per each workweek, unless they work less than 30 hours per week or each shift in that workweek is 6 hours or less, the California Supreme Court decided...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

California Supreme Court Clarifies "Day of Rest" Requirements

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

In a big win for California employers, the California Supreme Court ruled on May 8, 2017 that employers are not required to provide employees with a “day of rest” on a “rolling seven-day basis,” but must only ensure that...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide