News & Analysis as of

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter › Mayo v. Prometheus › Sequenom

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter refers to the types of inventions that can be legally patented. The criteria for patentability varies depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for instance, if a... more +
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter refers to the types of inventions that can be legally patented. The criteria for patentability varies depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for instance, if a researcher discovers a naturally occurring substance, the substance itself cannot be patented. This issue was examined in a United States Supreme Court case, AMP v. Myriad, in regard to the patentability of human genes.  less -
McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Investment in Biotechnology Companies -- Nature Biotechnology Report

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Despite an understandable amount of gloom and doom in patenting circles regarding the effects of the recent Supreme Court and Federal Circuit jurisprudence on life sciences patents (Mayo v. Prometheus; AMP v. Myriad Genetics;...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Federal Circuit Offers Path Through Section 101 Thicket for Biotech Method Patents

Foley Hoag LLP on

In its July 5, 2016 decision in Rapid Litigation Management Ltd and In Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc. and Invitrogen Corp., the Federal Circuit held that patent claims directed to an improved method of cryopreserving...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court Declines Sequenom Review

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Last week the United States Supreme Court denied Sequenom’s petition to review the Federal Circuit’s holding in Sequenom Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostic Inc., 788 F.3d 1371 (2015) that claims directed to detecting fetal DNA in...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Supreme Court Denies Sequenom’s Cert Petition, Leaving the Federal Circuit’s Interpretation of the Mayo/Alice Patent Eligibility...

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

The Supreme Court today denied Sequenom Inc.’s petition for writ of certiorari, in which Sequenom asked the Court to review a decision of the Federal Circuit invalidating its patent on a breakthrough prenatal diagnostic...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court Declines to Review Sequenom Ruling

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has denied certiorari in Sequenom, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. (No. 15-1182), declining to review the Federal Circuit’s June 12, 2015, decision that certain methods of detecting paternally...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Ariosa Files Opposition to Sequenom’s Cert Petition

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., Natera, Inc., and DNA Diagnostics Center, Inc. have filed briefs in opposition to Sequenom’s petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court for review of the Federal Circuit’s decision holding...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

New USPTO Guidance On Patent Eligibility Of Diagnostic Methods

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The patent eligibility examples published by the USPTO on May 5, 2016 include two new examples relating to diagnostic methods and two new examples relating to “nature-based” products. This article will consider the diagnostic...more

BakerHostetler

Supreme Court Asked to Clarify Limits on Diagnostic Method Patents

BakerHostetler on

Arguing that the current state of the law weakens the patent system and poses a danger to life science innovators, biotechnology company, Sequenom, Inc., has filed a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Sequenom Throws Diagnostic Method Patents At The Mercy Of The Supreme Court

Foley & Lardner LLP on

It comes as no surprise that Sequenom has filed a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court, asking the Court to review the Federal Circuit decision that upheld the district court decision that held its diagnostic method...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Sequenom Seeks Supreme Court Review of Non-invasive Prenatal Diagnosis Patent

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

On March 21, 2015, Sequenom filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court in Sequenom, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, et al. (No. 15-1182). In its petition, Sequenom calls its case the “ideal vehicle” for the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

No Second Life for Fetal Test - Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., et al. v. Sequenom, Inc., et al.

McDermott Will & Emery on

By a poll of active justices, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a petition for an en banc rehearing of Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., et al. v. Sequenom, Inc. et al. and issued two concurrences and one...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Top Five Stories of 2015

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

After reflecting upon the events of the past twelve months, Patent Docs presents its ninth annual list of top patent stories. For 2015, we identified twenty stories that were covered on Patent Docs last year that we believe...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Guest Post: Ariosa v Sequenom -- A Path to the Supreme Court?

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

There is no point in crying over spilled milk. The denial of an en banc hearing in the above case is now history. Apart from looking at the small print for pointers towards a more moderate approach, the focus now shifts to...more

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP

Federal Circuit Expresses Concern About Patent Eligibility Under Mayo

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP on

The “prognosis” for patentability of medical diagnostic claims remains uncertain after an order of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (“Court”) denying a petition for an en banc rehearing of its decision in Ariosa...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Judge Lourie Suggests Jepson Claims For Patent Eligibility

Foley & Lardner LLP on

As reported previously, the Federal Circuit has denied rehearing in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. I wrote about Judge ‘Dyk’s opinion concurring in the denial but offering alternative views on patent eligibility...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Important Development in Patent Subject Matter Eligibility for Diagnostic Method Claims: Federal Circuit Denies Sequenom Petition...

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

On December 2, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an order denying a petition for rehearing en banc in the closely watched Sequenom case. Earlier this year, on appeal from the U.S. District Court...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Judge Dyk Would Add Reduction To Practice To Patent Eligibility Requirement

Foley & Lardner LLP on

As noted in a previous article, the Federal Circuit has denied rehearing in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.. The per curiam order was accompanied by two separate concurring opinions, one authored by Judge Lourie...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Federal Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc in Ariosa v. Sequenom

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The Federal Circuit declined to rehear en banc the panel decision in Ariosa v. Sequenom. This decision was not surprising but what may be surprising was that only three judges wrote opinions, one in dissent (Judge Newman)...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Natera Responds to Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Last week, Appellee Natera, Inc. filed its response to the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Appellants Sequenom, Inc. and Sequenom Center for Molecular Medicine, LLC in August (see "Sequenom Requests Rehearing En...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Ariosa Diagnostics Responds to Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

On Monday, Appellee Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. filed its response to the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Appellants Sequenom, Inc. and Sequenom Center for Molecular Medicine, LLC in August. In its response, Ariosa...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: JYANT Technologies, Inc.

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: NYIPLA

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Guest Post -- On Ariosa and Natural Products

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Recently, I had the privilege of speaking at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pharmacognosy in Colorado. Members of this scientific association are dedicated to identifying and isolating natural products from...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Novartis AG

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Paul Gilbert Cole

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

38 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide