News & Analysis as of

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter › Supreme Court of the United States › United States Patent and Trademark Office

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter refers to the types of inventions that can be legally patented. The criteria for patentability varies depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for instance, if a... more +
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter refers to the types of inventions that can be legally patented. The criteria for patentability varies depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for instance, if a researcher discovers a naturally occurring substance, the substance itself cannot be patented. This issue was examined in a United States Supreme Court case, AMP v. Myriad, in regard to the patentability of human genes.  less -
Foley & Lardner LLP

Alice Patent Eligibility Analysis Divergence Before USPTO and District Court

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Mayo/Alice framework for determining subject matter eligibility of patents under 35 U.S.C. §101 has long since antagonized both patent prosecutors and litigators alike, causing significant uncertainty in the realm of...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

This Summer in Artificial Intelligence: Newly Released USPTO Guidance and Exemplary Worldwide Inventorship Updates

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. on

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently published new guidance on subject-matter eligibility as related to Artificial Intelligence (AI), opening a written comment window to respond with a deadline of...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

USPTO Issues Updated Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility and AI

Womble Bond Dickinson on

From the U.S. Supreme Court’s perspective, its Mayo and Alice decisions from 2012 and 2014, respectively, are still sufficient to govern patent law’s § 101 analysis. This inference stems in-part of the Supreme Court’s cert...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Is Your Blockchain Invention Patentable?

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints on

Blockchain is becoming central to more FinTech patent portfolios than ever – but it’s harder to obtain protection on blockchain than most other technologies. The US Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. CLS Bank (2014)...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

RegenxBio Inc. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (D. Del. 2024)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

A consequence (predominantly negative) of the Supreme Court's recent foray into defining (however inadequately) the contours of patent-eligible subject matter is to give the district courts (and to a somewhat lesser extent,...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Testifying on the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act

Foley & Lardner LLP on

When we first wrote about the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act (PERA), I had no idea I would have the honor of being invited to testify before the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property of the Senate Judiciary Committee, but...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2023)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In those (in retrospect) halcyon days more than a decade ago (before Mayo, Myriad, Alice, and the subject matter eligibility quagmire arose), perhaps the most significant Supreme Court decision was KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

What Patent Bills Would Mean for Infringement Litigation

Farella Braun + Martel LLP on

Two bills recently introduced in Congress could significantly affect the current patent litigation landscape. The bipartisan bills are titled the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 and the Promoting and Respecting...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - July 2023 #4

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

United Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2022-2217, 2023-1021 (Fed. Cir. July 24, 2023) In the Federal Circuit’s only precedential patent case this week, the Court considered questions...more

Jones Day

Generative AI-Assisted Patent Inventorship Questions Remain

Jones Day on

The Situation: The U.S. Supreme Court recently denied certiorari in Thaler v. Vidal, leaving intact the Federal Circuit's ruling that only human beings, and not artificial intelligence ("AI") systems, can be inventors under...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court on Section 101 Patent Eligibility: Thanks But No Thanks

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court conferred on two patent eligibility cases last week. And, if you are like me, you did not sleep a wink while anxiously awaiting the Court's decision. But if you're reading this, you likely already know...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Top Section 101 Patent Eligibility Stories of 2022

Holland & Knight LLP on

You waited all year for it, so let's get going. But first, some important holiday notes: Looking to do some holiday baking that's a bit different? A couple suggestions: Ok – now to our top Section 101 stories of the year ...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The Supreme Court Sidesteps America's Patent Eligibility Crisis

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In an order that is clearly less impactful and damaging than a number of opinions that the Supreme Court has disgorged in the last two weeks, the justices have denied certiorari in American Axle & Mfg. Inc. v. Neapco Holdings...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Denies Cert in American Axle

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In a month where the Supreme Court's conservative majority has exercised its judicial muscle by striking down several well-established precedents, one portion of their jurisprudence is as fixed a constant as the Northern...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Top Section 101 Patent Eligibility Stories of 2021

Holland & Knight LLP on

It's that time of the year again. Take your rapid test, light a fire and gather with family and friends to discuss the top patent eligibility stories of 2021 (or debate "The Holiday" vs. "Love Actually"). No. 3: More of...more

Weintraub Tobin

USPTO Requests Input On Patent Eligibility From Critical Sectors Impacted By Current Law

Weintraub Tobin on

In recent years, the Supreme Court has decided a number of cases, including Bilski v. Kappos, Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad, and Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, which...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Patent Eligibility Law: Status Quo for Now, But Is Change on the Horizon?

Fenwick & West LLP on

There have been no substantial changes to patent eligibility law or practice under 35 U.S.C. § 101 since the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s last guidance in October 2019. With legislative reform in Congress stalled,...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Requests View of Solicitor General in American Axle v. Neapco

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court requested the views of the Solicitor General in its consideration of American Axle's certiorari petition, which asks the Court to reverse the Federal Circuit's decision in American Axle & Mfg. v....more

Fenwick & West LLP

Justice Barrett to Bring Clarity to Patent Eligibility Law?

Fenwick & West LLP on

Each time the U.S. Supreme Court has addressed patent eligibility, the law surrounding what can and cannot be patented has become murkier. Most recently, the wake of the Supreme Court’s Alice ruling has led to irreconcilable...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

American Axle v. Neapco

Ladas & Parry LLP on

On July 31, 2020, in American Axle v. Neapco, the Federal Circuit split 6-6 on the question of whether to grant en banc review of a panel decision on patent eligibility seen by many as an unwarranted extension of the...more

Holland & Knight LLP

USPTO Director Iancu Calls for Section 101 Patent Eligibility Reform in Farewell Speech

Holland & Knight LLP on

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Andrei Iancu recently resigned his position with the USPTO and delivered his farewell speech at a U.S. Chamber of Commerce event on Jan. 19, 2021. In the speech, Iancu...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Two Concurrent but Very Different Cert Petitions Seek Supreme Court Review of “Laws of Nature” Exception

Fenwick & West LLP on

For more than a decade, this blog has covered the topic of patentable subject matter. Over the years, we’ve addressed various issues regarding business methods, abstract ideas and other various topics. The “laws of nature”...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Will 2021 Be the Year the U.S. Supreme Court Again Addresses Section 101 Eligibility?

Holland & Knight LLP on

In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Section 101 patent eligibility cases again, and again, and again. But is 2021 the year that the Supreme Court finally addresses the topic? Maybe. I'm hesitant to say yes....more

Holland & Knight LLP

Top Section 101 Patent Eligibility Stories of 2020

Holland & Knight LLP on

Light a fire, pour yourself some glogg (21+) and find a comfy corner to read about the biggest Section 101 stories of 2020 because we're gonna have the hap-hap-happiest time since Bing Crosby tap-danced with . . . Well, you...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The Three Properties of Patent-Eligibility: An Empirical Study

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Patent eligibility is a bit of a mess these days.  Ever since the Supreme Court handed down the Alice v. CLS Bank decision six years ago, the distinction between what might be subject matter that can be patented and what is...more

127 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide