News & Analysis as of

Patent Exhaustion Supreme Court of the United States Breach of Contract

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Patent Exhaustion Defense Unavailable to Reseller after Impression Products

In an application of 2017 U.S. Supreme Court precedent in Impressions Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Intern., Inc., the Northern District California in International Fruit Genetics LLC v. Orcharddepot.com, No. 4:17-cv-02905-JSW,...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Patent Exhaustion: Supreme Court Expands Patent-Limiting Doctrine

The U.S. Supreme Court at the end of the past term handed down a decision, Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., that greatly expanded the doctrine of patent exhaustion. This equitable doctrine prevents a...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

United States Supreme Court Decision In Impression Products Inc. V Lexmark International Inc.

Ladas & Parry LLP on

In 1628, Lord Coke in his “Institutes of the laws of England” summarized the common law on restraints on the alienation of chattels stating that any attempt by a seller to restrict resale or use of the chattel after selling...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - June 2017

Knobbe Martens on

Inter Partes Reexamination Estoppel Attaches On Claim-by-Claim Basis for New Requests and Pending Proceedings - In In re Affinity Labs Of Texas, LLC, Appeal Nos. 2016-1092, 2016-1172, the Federal Circuit held that the...more

Jackson Walker

Supreme Court Holds Sale of Patented Product Exhausts All Patent Rights

Jackson Walker on

In a nearly unanimous opinion issued recently, the U.S. Supreme Court held “a patentee’s decision to sell a product exhausts all of its patent rights in that item, regardless of any restrictions the patentee purports to...more

Perkins Coie

First Impressions: New Strategies in the New Era of Patent Exhaustion After Impression Products v. Lexmark International

Perkins Coie on

In Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, No. 15–1189, 137 S. Ct. ___, 2017 WL 2322830 (May 30, 2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a patentee’s sale of a product exhausts all of its U.S. patent rights in...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Supreme Court Limits Patent Owners’ Ability to Control Post-Sale Use of Patented Products

Foley Hoag LLP on

The Supreme Court last week issued its long-awaited decision regarding patent exhaustion in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International. The decision, which overturns longstanding Federal Circuit precedent, curtails...more

Burr & Forman

Supreme Court Clarifies Patent Exhaustion Doctrine and Limits Post-Sale Control

Burr & Forman on

In Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., the Supreme Court held that after a patent holder sells a patented product, the patent holder cannot control the product by way of patent rights. United States...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

First Sale Extinguishes Patent Rights: Supreme Court Guts Manufacturer Control Over Secondary Market

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Manufacturers have long used patents, licenses and litigation to deter competitive products and restrict secondary markets in their products. The U.S. Supreme Court just dealt these practices a severe blow, confirming that a...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

What the Supreme Court’s Latest Patent Decision Means for Automotive Suppliers

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Although U.S. patent law has long-established limits on enforcement after a patented product has been sold, the technological innovations may put a bulls-eye on the automotive industry for patent litigation. However, when...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court Holds First Authorized Domestic or International Sale Exhausts U.S. Patent Rights

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On May 30, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. that “patent exhaustion is uniform and automatic” and that patent exhaustion applies, both domestically (in an 8-0...more

Vedder Price

Impression v. Lexmark: Patent Rights Exhausted by Sale, Domestic or Abroad

Vedder Price on

The United States Supreme Court in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., held that patent owner’s decision to sell a product exhausts all of its patent rights in that item, regardless of any restrictions...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Supreme Court to Patent Holders: Sell Product Anywhere, Exhaust Patent Rights Everywhere

Reversing long-standing Federal Circuit precedent, the United States Supreme Court has now held that a patentee extinguishes its patent rights on a product upon its sale of that product, regardless of (1) whether the patentee...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Supreme Court Overrules and Rewrites 25 Years of Federal Circuit Law on Patent Exhaustion

In keeping with recent erosion of patent rights, patent owners’ power to control the post-sale use and sale of their patented products was severely limited this week by the U.S. Supreme Court in the highly anticipated case...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Supreme Court Rules That Restricted Sales of Patented Cartridges Exhaust Patent Rights

Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., Supreme Court Case 15-1189 (May 30, 2017) - The Supreme Court reverses an en banc Federal Circuit decision and rules that a “conditional sale” that ?transfers...more

15 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide