News & Analysis as of

Securities Litigation Cyan Inc v Beaver Cty Emps Ret Fund

Woodruff Sawyer

Securities Class Actions Report: Filings Against Public Companies Down for Second Year in a Row

Woodruff Sawyer on

In 2021, 182 securities class actions were filed against issuers of stock listed on US exchanges. This statistic means that the total number of annual filings in 2021 was down 13% compared to 2020. As highlighted in our...more

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes

Supreme Court to Decide Whether Discovery Stays Apply to State-Court Securities Lawsuits This Fall

One of the most significant differences between bringing a securities lawsuit in state versus federal court is the application of the mandatory discovery stay set forth in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (the...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

In the Wake of the Pandora’s Box Opened by the Supreme Court’s Cyan Decision, Court to Address Discovery Stay Question in State...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On July 2, 2021, the US Supreme Court granted the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari filed in Pivotal Software, to address one of the many questions stemming from the Court’s decision in Cyan, which permitted state courts to...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

First Department Issues First Ruling Dismissing Securities Act Claims Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Cyan Decision

As New York commercial practitioners will recall, the U.S. Supreme Court in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver Cty. Emps. Ret. Fund held that state and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction over class actions alleging violations of...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Two Additional California Courts Dismiss Securities Act Claims in Favor of Federal Forum Selection Provisions

As previously discussed in our Sept. 10, 2020, client alert, in Wong v. Restoration Robotics, Inc., Case No. 18-CIV-02609 (Cal. Super. Ct. Sept. 1, 2020), the Superior Court of California for the County of San Mateo dismissed...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Dropbox Becomes Third California Superior Court Decision To Enforce Delaware Corporations’ Federal Forum Provision For Securities...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Three separate California Superior Courts have recently upheld federal forum provisions (“FFP”) in governing corporate documents to preclude state court actions under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) (15...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

New York Appellate Division Decides First Securities Act Case Since Cyan

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On December 3, 2020, the New York State Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department dismissed an action alleging claims under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) in Lyu v. Ruhnn Holdings Limited....more

Dechert LLP

State Courts Continue to Enforce Federal Forum Provisions

Dechert LLP on

Corporations started inserting federal forum provisions in light of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, 138 S. Ct. 1061 (“Cyan”) (2018), which reaffirmed...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

California Superior Courts Enforce Delaware Corporations’ Federal Forum Provision For Securities Act Lawsuits

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In recent decisions, two separate California Superior Courts have upheld federal forum provisions (“FFP”) in governing corporate documents to preclude state court actions under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Key Takeaways | Developments and Trends in Securities Litigation: Mid-Year Update 2020

On September 15, 2020, Skadden held the first program in our annual Securities Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement Update, titled “Developments and Trends in Securities Litigation: Mid-Year Update 2020.” ... ...The...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Judge Rules California State Law Does Not Prohibit Federal Forum Provisions That Seek To Avoid Cyan’s Bar on Removal of Securities...

- California state court held that federal forum provisions for Securities Act claims are not illegal and may be used to sidestep the bar on removal of Securities Act claims following the United States Supreme Court’s ruling...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Provisions Designating Federal Courts as Exclusive Forum of 1933 Act Claims

In Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi, No. 346, 2019 (Del. Mar. 18, 2020), the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the validity of corporate charter provisions designating federal courts as the exclusive forum for the litigation of claims...more

Sullivan & Worcester

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Federal Forum Selection Provisions - Delaware Corporations May Now Adopt Federal Forum Selection...

Sullivan & Worcester on

On March 18, 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Delaware Court of Chancery and held that Delaware corporations can adopt federal forum selection provisions for claims arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Delaware Supreme Court: Delaware Corporations May Adopt Federal-Forum Provisions Requiring That Securities Act Claims Be Brought...

Ruling suggests a new means of stemming the flood tide of state-court Securities Act claims that followed the U.S. Supreme Court’s Cyan decision in 2018. But uncertainty lingers as to whether post-IPO public companies can...more

White and Williams LLP

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Federal Forum Selection for Securities Act Claims

White and Williams LLP on

On Wednesday, March 18, 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court overturned a Chancery Court decision that had prohibited Delaware corporations from adopting federal forum selection provisions for actions arising under the federal...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Delaware Supreme Court Revives Charter Provision Requiring Securities Act Claims Be Brought in Federal Court

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The Delaware Supreme Court, in reversing a Delaware Court of Chancery decision, upheld a corporate charter provision requiring stockholders bring claims arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the 1933 Act), in...more

WilmerHale

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Federal Forum Provisions in Landmark Ruling

WilmerHale on

On March 18, 2020, in a landmark ruling in Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi, No. 346, 2019 (Del. Mar. 18, 2020), the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the validity of provisions of corporate articles of incorporation that require...more

Morgan Lewis

Delaware Supreme Court Ruling Allows Exclusive Federal Forum Provisions For ’33 Act Claims

Morgan Lewis on

The Delaware Supreme Court held on March 18 in Salzberg, et al. v. Sciabacucchi that the exclusive federal-forum provisions in certificates of incorporation for three Delaware corporations were not facially invalid....more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Provisions Designating Federal Courts as Exclusive Forum of 1933 Act Claims

On March 18th, the Delaware Supreme Court issued a key decision upholding the validity of corporate charter provisions that designate federal courts as the exclusive forum for the litigation of 1933 Act claims. This opinion...more

Winstead PC

Keeping it All in the Family

Winstead PC on

This week the Delaware Supreme Court ruled that Delaware corporations may enforce federal forum selection clauses (so-called federal forum provisions or “FFPs”) for lawsuits alleging breaches of the Securities Act of 1933....more

A&O Shearman

So Long, Cyan?—Delaware Supreme Court Endorses Federal Forum-selection Provisions for Securities Act Claims

A&O Shearman on

Today, the Supreme Court of Delaware reversed a decision of the Delaware Court of Chancery and affirmatively endorsed the enforceability of federal forum-selection provisions, in a Delaware corporation’s certificate of...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Carving Out Some IPO Protections

Thanks to a 2018 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, the risk of IPO-related securities litigation has never been higher with class actions often brought by plaintiffs in both federal and state courts. With Congress not...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Securities Class Action Filings Continue Record Pace

Several securities litigation trends over recent years show no signs of abating in 2020. Federal securities class action filings seem likely to remain at elevated levels. Last year, for the third consecutive year, more than...more

A&O Shearman

Connecticut State Court Grants Motion To Strike Securities Act Claims

A&O Shearman on

On October 24, 2019, Judge Charles T. Lee of the Connecticut Superior Court granted a motion to strike claims alleging violations of Sections 11, 12(a) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) in connection...more

Allen Matkins

Is The Court of Chancery Sending Cases To California?

Allen Matkins on

In Sciabacucchi v. Salzberg, 2018 Del. Ch. LEXIS 578, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster ruled that a Delaware corporation’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws cannot restrict the forum in which stockholders may bring a...more

72 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide