News & Analysis as of

Twitter Patents

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - May 18, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued six decisions: Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, No. 21-757: This case addressed the Patent Act’s “enablement” requirement—the provision that requires a patent applicant to describe...more

Jones Day

Book As A Printed Publication? Read Carefully.

Jones Day on

Be careful not to confuse reprints with new editions when considering books as printed publications under 35 U.S.C. 102(b). In VidStream LLC v. Twitter, Inc., No. 2019-1734, 2020 WL 6937852 (Nov. 25, 2020), the Federal...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Two Key Takeaways from VidStream LLC v. Twitter

In 2017, Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) filed two petitions requesting inter parties review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 9,083,997 (“the ’997 patent”), with the first petition directed to claims 1-19 and the second petition directed...more

WilmerHale

CAFC Patent Cases - December 2020

WilmerHale on

Precedential Federal Circuit Opinions - VIDSTREAM LLC v. TWITTER, INC. [OPINION] (2019-1734, 2019-1735, 11/25/2020) (Newman, O'Malley, Taranto) - Newman, J. Affirming the decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more

Knobbe Martens

It’s a Date – Twitter Reply Proves Prior Art Publication Date

Knobbe Martens on

VIDSTREAM LLC V. TWITTER, INC. Before Newman, O’Malley, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Evidence of a prior art reference’s publication date submitted after an IPR petition may be...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - November 2020 #5

VidStream LLC v. Twitter, Inc., Appeal No. 2019-1734, -1735 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 25, 2020) - In the Federal Circuit’s only precedential case last week, the Court addressed the extent to which a book published before the...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - September 2020 #2

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1456, -1457 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 25, 2020) - In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit addressed two novel issues following inter partes review...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc. (D. Nev. 2018)

District Court Refuses to Limit Application of In re Cray to Factual Circumstances Where Physical Products Are Involved - Last month, in VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc., District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II of the...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

EasyWeb Innovations, LLC v. Twitter, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Message Publishing Patents Found Invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 - In a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Court held all asserted claims of five U.S. patents to be invalid under 35...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Video Upload Facilitation Patents Invalid Under Alice Framework

On November 10, 2016, Judge David C. Godbey of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that two video upload patents were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The patents, owned by Youtoo...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Judge Bianco Holds EasyWeb’s “Publishing Patent” Is Not Infringed Even Though It Broadly Claims an Abstract Idea

On March 30, 2016, District Court Judge Joseph F. Bianco granted defendant Twitter Inc.’s (“Twitter”) motions for summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement against plaintiff EasyWeb Innovations, LLC (“EasyWeb”),...more

Knobbe Martens

To Tweet or Not to Tweet: Social Media and Intellectual Property Issues

Knobbe Martens on

Social media platforms are very useful, but they also create legal issues. Without question, social media has changed the way businesses communicate with their clients and consumers. Likewise, social media has changed the way...more

King & Spalding

Intellectual Property Newsletter - September/October 2015

King & Spalding on

PTAB Update on Inter Partes Review - On August 19, 2015, the Director of the USPTO released a blog post reporting on the state of post-grant review proceedings created by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011 and...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Intellectual Property Bulletin - Spring 2015

Fenwick & West LLP on

California’s Eraser Law: What IP Attorneys and Owners Need to Know - Hector recently graduated from UC Berkeley and is anxious about his upcoming job interview. He is about to enter the adult world. But he has also got...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide