Latest Publications

Share:

Two business court rulings offer insights on trade secret pleadings, employment agreements, and credibility

Maven Advantage, Inc. and Square One Storm Restoration, LLC are competing roofing businesses. Maven alleged that two employees (Couch and Daniels) stole Maven’s trade secrets (customer lists) and then quit to work for Square...more

A(nother) Cautionary Tale on the Importance of Operating Agreements

To practitioners familiar with internal disputes involving closely held companies, the allegations in Lafayette Village Pub, LLC v. Burnham, 2025 NCBC 8, are nothing new. The member running the business (allegedly) made bad,...more

Want to pierce the corporate veil? Plead facts, not just factors.

Only two months into 2025, and the Business Court has already denied two motions for leave to add claims to pierce the corporate veil. My fellow-Foxer, Brad Risinger reported here on the first opinion from Judge Earp in MD...more

Productivity and Progress: Recap of the 2024 Business Court Report and Some Civics

Each February, the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts publishes its Report on North Carolina Business Court. The Report includes data on case types, number of cases, pending motions, and average age, with...more

No rubber stamps here. Judge Conrad denies a motion to seal.

This lawsuit involves breach of a confidential settlement agreement. In motion briefing, both sides relied on and filed the subject agreement. Both sides also filed (unopposed) motions to seal it. These two Orders from...more

Not all FedEx’s are created equal, at least when it comes to service

A party trying to serve their pleading used FedEx, but not the right FedEx. Turns out there are a slew of similarly-named FedEx’s, but only certain ones are approved “designated delivery services” under Rule 4. They used...more

(Apparent) Litigation by Ambush is Not a Good Tactic in the Business Court

Prevailing at summary judgment is rare. Prevailing when there are competing motions on the same issue (fraud) is even rarer. In this opinion, Judge Davis granted the Defendants’ motion and denied the Plaintiff’s, ending the...more

Denied! Judge Davis rejects a “half-hearted” approach to obtaining a preliminary injunction

To secure a preliminary injunction, a party must present evidence of two things, and fast: (1) likelihood of success on the merits; and (2) irreparable harm. In this recent Order of Significance (denying a preliminary...more

No lawyer, no problem. Justice will still be served.

Judge Conrad’s Final Judgment in Airtron, Inc. v. Bradley Allen Heinrich ends this years-long Chapter 75, trade secret case. No doubt, the plaintiff (Airtron) pushed this lawsuit to make a point: if you take our secrets, we...more

Prove it! Lessons learned from recent N.C. Business Court rulings on fee petitions. 

Every litigant wants their attorneys’ fees, but actually recovering them in North Carolina is rare. Fee recovery must be authorized by rule or statute, and fees must be “reasonable.”...more

 Not all contacts are created equal: more PJ lessons from the Business Court.

A few months after successfully settling its lawsuit and obtaining a consent judgment against JUUL, the State of North Carolina doubled down, suing five of JUUL’s officers and directors for unfair or deceptive trade...more

NC Revives Emergency Remote Notarization, Enacts Permanent Law to Debut in 2023

At the onset of the pandemic, North Carolina passed a law allowing emergency remote notarization and oaths by live video (e.g., Facetime, WebEx, Zoom). This emergency law had a built-in sunset of August 1, 2020, since the...more

Business Court Imposes Sanctions on Attorney-Litigant for Falsifying Evidence

Think back-dating that email will help your case? Think again. Ford v. Jurgens, 2022 NCBC Order 9 (N.C. Super. Ct. Feb. 16, 2022) involved a dispute between a nonprofit real estate investment association (“the...more

No License, No Contract, No Claim

Can an unlicensed general contractor enforce a construction contract in North Carolina? “No,” and as Judge Conrad explains, “[t]his is an unyielding rule.” JCG & Associates, LLC vs. Disaster America USA, LLC, 2021 NCBC...more

NC Extends Permission For Remote Notarization And Oaths To December 31, 2021

At the onset of the pandemic, North Carolina passed a law allowing remote notarization and oaths by live video (e.g., Facetime, WebEx, Zoom). With a built-in sunset of August 1, 2020, the authorization for remote...more

A ‘Measured Reopening’ Of the North Carolina Court System

As COVID-19 numbers improve, North Carolina is among the states beginning to resume in-person hearings and civil trials. The week of March 14 saw several developments that collectively signal a “measured reopening” of the...more

When It Comes To PJ, KYC (Know Your Contractor) – Or At Least Where They Are Headquartered.

Contract with “substantial connection” with NC leads to PJ over a California Defendant who never visited NC. In Toshiba Global Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. Smart & Final Stores LLC, 2020 NCBC 95, Judge Conrad held that...more

NC Chief Justice Halts Jury Trials, Extends COVID-Related Protections

On December 14, 2020, Chief Justice Cheri Beasley of the North Carolina Supreme Court issued an order postponing all nonessential, in-person court proceedings for (at least) 30 days, including jury trials. The order also...more

For Hybrid Business-Legal Communications, Privilege Depends On The “Primary Purpose”

In this order from Buckley LLP v. Series 1 of Oxford Ins. Co. NC LLC, Chief Judge Bledsoe dealt with dueling motions to compel. Both sides claimed that their hybrid business-legal communications were privileged. After an...more

North Carolina Extends Permission For Remote Notarization And Oaths To March 1, 2021

At the onset of the pandemic, North Carolina passed a law allowing remote notarization and oaths by live video (e.g., Facetime, WebEx, Zoom). With a built-in sunset of August 1, 2020, the authorization for remote...more

Masks Now Mandatory In North Carolina: What Businesses Need To Know

North Carolina businesses take note: face coverings (i.e., masks) are now required. That means all North Carolinians should review and understand the new statewide face covering requirements, implemented by Executive Order...more

North Carolina Significantly Expands Limited Immunity Against COVID-19 Transmission Claims

North Carolina has enacted two new laws providing broad immunity against COVID-19 transmission claims to essentially everyone in the state, unless they were grossly negligent or acted intentionally (Session Law...more

Questions And Answers On North Carolina’s New Face Coverings Requirement

North Carolina businesses take note: face coverings (i.e., masks) are now required. That means all North Carolinians should review and understand the new statewide face covering requirements, implemented by Executive Order...more

Another PJ Decision: SC Employer Was Subject To PJ In Employee’s NC WFH Location. Compared To Other PJ Questions, This One Seemed...

If you have employees that work from home (WFH), you may be subject to PJ in their location. During the last few months, the NC Supreme and Business Courts have answered some tricky PJ questions: Are pre-conflict contacts...more

Force Majeure, Commercial Frustration And Impossibility – Defenses All NC Businesses Should Understand

By now, most North Carolina businesses have considered this question: Does the pandemic or a government stay-at-home order forgive our performance under a commercial contract? The simple, but unsatisfactory, answer is...more

36 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide