Latest Publications

Share:

Lakatamia Shipping: off the hook? High Court finds no third-party breach of a freezing injunction

Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Su and others [2024] EWHC 1749 (Comm) illustrates how the Babanaft proviso typically included in a worldwide freezing order may serve to limit the liability of foreign third parties who...more

Ask, and you shall receive – English Court of Appeal grants anti-suit injunction in support of foreign arbitration

In Deutsche Bank AG v RusChemAlliance LLC [2023] EWCA Civ 1144, the English Court of Appeal granted an anti-suit injunction to restrain Russian court proceedings brought in breach of an agreement to arbitrate in Paris,...more

Tinkler v Esken Limited: was Mr. Tinkler swindled? Court of Appeal dismisses application to set aside a judgment alleged to be...

A challenge to a Court judgment on grounds of fraud brings into conflict two fundamental principles of English law: (i) the finality of judgments; and (ii) the principle that fraud unravels all. Given the importance of the...more

Santina v Rare Art: in the soup – worldwide freezing injunction over a £14,000 costs order?

The English Court's jurisdiction to grant freezing injunctions has been the subject of considerable judicial attention in recent years. In Convoy Collateral v Broad Idea,1 the Privy Council "laid to rest" the House of Lords'...more

English High Court sanctions German real estate group’s ‘wind-down’ restructuring plan

The English High Court has sanctioned a restructuring plan in respect of EUR 3.2 billion of bonds issued by the German real estate business, Adler Group. The main objective of the plan was to avoid Adler's imminent insolvency...more

Call of Duty: Sequana and the state of directors’ duties

Recently, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom released its judgment in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA1. This marks the first occasion on which the nature, scope and content of directors' duties to creditors when a company is...more

HP v Autonomy: The “fake it ‘till we make it” start-up culture on trial

In its long-awaited judgment, the English High Court1 has found that the British software firm Autonomy defrauded the US tech giant Hewlett-Packard (HP) and induced its own acquisition for the price of US$11.1bn...more

High value metals fraud: unlawful means conspiracy

Forged warehouse receipts have proved fertile ground for commodity finance disputes in recent years. In Natixis S.A. v Marex Financial and Access World Logistics (Singapore) Pte Ltd1 the Commercial Court delivered a judgment...more

5 things you need to know about … SPACs litigation risks

This year has seen continued enthusiasm for the use of SPACs when taking companies public. While this boom has been particularly pronounced in the US, there are increasing signs that a similar trend may be about to emerge in...more

AAA plc & ors v Persons Unknown: Cyber Activism or Blackmail?

In recent years, demands for payments in cryptocurrencies have become the ransom of choice for cyber extortionists and other online frauds. The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting public health lockdowns precipitated an...more

Seriously irregular: High Court orders tribunal to reconsider arbitral award

In a rare successful challenge to an arbitration award under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, the Commercial Court remitted parts of an award for reconsideration by the tribunal.  The Court found that a computational...more

Proving Fraud in the English Courts – a higher standard?

The Court of Appeal has confirmed in Bank St Petersburg PJSC v Vitaly Arkhangelsky that the correct standard of proof where issues of dishonesty arise is not a ‘heightened’ civil standard, but the balance of probabilities....more

National Bank Trust v Ilya Yurov: "a Ponzi scheme with a fancy name" – Proving Fraud in the English Courts

National Bank Trust v Ilya Yurov & Ors [2020] EWHC 100 (Comm) provides a useful insight to the English Court's approach to pleading and evidencing fraud, emphasising the importance of properly particularised claims and...more

CAA v R (on the application of Jet2.com Limited): the Court of Appeal confirms the dominant purpose test for legal advice...

In perhaps the clearest statement on this issue to date, the Court of Appeal in The Civil Aviation Authority v R (on the application of Jet2.com Limited), has confirmed the "dominant purpose" test for legal advice privilege....more

Vneshprombank v Bedzhamov: freezing orders, lavish lifestyles and the “ordinary living expenses” exception

In Vneshprombank LLC v Georgy Bedzhamov and ors [2019] EWCA Civ 1992 the Court of Appeal reaffirmed the approach to ascertaining the "ordinary living expenses" of a respondent to a freezing injunction....more

S.90A FSMA: Two strikes and its (not) out for Tesco

In an important judgment on the interpretation of section 90A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, Tesco Plc failed to strike out two group litigation actions brought in relation to allegedly false and misleading...more

PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov: Security for costs order against Russian Claimant with assets in Switzerland and Cyprus

In PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov [2019] EWHC 1400 (Comm) the High Court gave a useful indication as to the readiness of the English Courts to award security for costs against a Russian domiciled claimant, in view of perceived...more

Financial Regulatory Observer – June 2019: New UK peer-to-peer lending rules catch up with innovation

Within a decade, the UK's peer-to-peer (P2P) financial services sector has moved from an offbeat outsider to an increasingly significant and permanent player in loan and equity markets. Total lending facilitated by UK P2P...more

The meaning of "serious harm": the Supreme Court in Lachaux v Independent Print

The increasing accessibility of digital media has enabled businesses to become not only readers, but also publishers of their own information and opinions. This in turn requires due consideration of the limits of what can,...more

Norwich Pharmacal relief – costs, rights and obligations in pre-action disclosure

In a decision handed down last week, Jofa Limited and Joseph Farah v Benherst Finance Limited and Chestone Industry Holding [2019] EWCA Civ 899, the Court of Appeal considered the rules regarding the costs of applications for...more

The Angel Bell post-judgment – the exception and not the rule?

In a decision handed down last week, Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v John Forster Emmott [2019] EWCA Civ 219, the Court of Appeal has reviewed the authorities relating to removing, following judgment, the so-called Angel Bell...more

21 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide