In a recent decision by the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Kings County (the Court), HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (the Plaintiff) initiated a mortgage foreclosure action against Jack and Sabah Srugo (collectively, the...more
A recent decision in the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, New York County, emphasizes the importance of clear and unambiguous contract drafting in all lending situations, including real estate. Acting Supreme Court...more
The Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Westchester, recently held that the doctrine of res judicata bars a lender’s claim that a borrower’s subsequent transfers of property are void, if the claim is brought...more
The New York County Supreme Court recently held that in the event of foreclosure, a receiver can be appointed, regardless of necessity, when the parties have contracted for such appointment. 24 West 57 APF LLC (“Defendant”)...more
4/3/2024
/ Borrowers ,
Contract Terms ,
Court-Appointed Receivers ,
CPLR ,
Ex Parte ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Foreclosure ,
Mortgage Lenders ,
Mortgages ,
NV Supreme Court ,
Real Estate Transactions ,
Receivership ,
Wells Fargo
Does a lender have the right to foreclose its mortgage if a payoff of such mortgage is made by wire transfer, but the payment does not make it to the lender’s account? A recent case, heard on appeal by the New York Supreme...more
10/27/2023
/ Borrowers ,
Consumer Financial Products ,
Financial Institutions ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Foreclosure ,
Money Transfer ,
Mortgage Lenders ,
Mortgage Servicers ,
Mortgages ,
Ocwen ,
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) ,
US Bank National Association ,
Wire Transfers
In light of the current economic climate, real estate lenders and borrowers will certainly be communicating with one another frequently concerning potential loan modifications and accommodations. It is prudent for lenders to...more
In a decision rendered September 8, 2022, a three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the “Court”) vacated a February, 2021 decision by the United States District Court for the Southern...more
9/29/2022
/ Borrowers ,
Citibank ,
Clerical Errors ,
Conversion ,
Credit Agreements ,
Financial Institutions ,
Interest Payments ,
Lenders ,
Loan Agreements ,
Real Estate Financing ,
Restitution ,
Revlon ,
Syndicated Loans ,
Unjust Enrichment ,
Wire Transfers
In real estate financing, most loan documents restrict a Borrower’s right to alter the collateralized real property. Alterations provisions in loan documents pertain to any alterations, improvements, or demolition of any...more
The New York State Supreme Court, New York County Commercial Division (the “Court”) decided in U.S. Bank, N.A. v. 342 Property LLC, on February 14, 2022, that a mezzanine lender that is not a party to loan documents that...more
4/27/2022
/ Article III ,
Borrowers ,
Breach of Contract ,
Contract Terms ,
Default ,
Foreclosure ,
Intercreditor Agreements ,
Lenders ,
Membership Interest ,
Mezzanine Lenders ,
Mortgages ,
NY Supreme Court ,
Real Estate Market ,
Standing ,
Summary Judgment ,
US Bank National Association
While some commercial real estate loans are fully funded at loan closing, others are funded in whole or in part through future advances. Some loans provide for future advances to fund tenant improvement work and leasing...more
The New York State Supreme Court, County of New York (the “Court”) decided in Atlas Brookview Mezzanine LLC v. DB Brookview LLC, on November 18, 2021, that an accommodation pledge entered into in connection with a mortgage...more
2/28/2022
/ Borrowers ,
Equity ,
Foreclosure ,
Loan Documentation ,
Loans ,
Mezzanine Lenders ,
Mortgages ,
NY Supreme Court ,
Real Estate Transactions ,
Right of Redemption ,
Security Agreements ,
Unenforceable Contract Terms ,
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
On November 10, 2021, the owner of the State Street Financial Center in Boston, Massachusetts defaulted on its debt, consisting of a mortgage loan in the amount of $535,000,000 and three mezzanine loans in the aggregate...more
Lenders often require their borrowers to be “special purpose entities” in real estate transactions. This is a way that lenders can mitigate their bankruptcy risk in the event that the borrower or any of its parent entities...more
On February 16, 2021, the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) issued a decision In Re Citibank August 11, 2020 Wire Transfers1 that upheld the “discharge for value” doctrine and...more
Assembly Bill A3139 was introduced by Assembly Member Harvey Epstein on January 22, 2021. The bill is currently in committee but, if enacted, it will amend New York’s Real Property Law and Tax Law to require the recording of...more
A recent decision of New York’s highest court potentially strengthens the ability of lenders to bring suits against third parties for participation in a borrower’s breach of single purpose entity/bankruptcy remote loan...more
On August 3, 2020, in Shelbourne BRF LLC, Shelbourne 677 LLC v. SR 677 BWAY LLC, the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the “Court”) granted the borrower plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and prohibited the...more