Service and Justice: Veterans in Law – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
Hollywood Overruled: Real Lessons from Cinematic Litigation – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
It Only Took 13 Years: The Federal Circuit's First Derivation Proceeding Decision — Patents: Post-Grant Podcast
Managing the Financial Impact of Tariffs on Your Government Contract
High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Unruly Passengers – How a Bad Flight Could Ruin Your Travel Future
Is the Deal Done? Litigation After Mergers and Acquisitions – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
FTC and Florida Focus on Non-Competes, SCOTUS to Rule on Pension Withdrawal Liability - #WorkforceWednesday® - Employment Law This Week®
Master the First Moves in Litigation for Courtroom Advantage – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
Harnessing AI in Litigation: Techniques, Opportunities, and Risks – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
Trade Secrets on Trial: Strategic Decisions for the Courtroom - Employment Law This Week® - Spilling Secrets Podcast
Aligning Business Goals with Legal Strategies Amid Regulatory Change – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
Whistleblower Challenges and Employer Responses: One-on-One with Alex Barnard
Eyes on the Evidence: Powerful Legal Presentations – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
Courtroom Chemistry: How Trial Team Dynamics Shape Case Outcomes – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
When a co-shareholder purchases the debt obligations of the company without partners' knowledge
#WorkforceWednesday®: Trade Secret Litigation - Lessons from High-Stakes Group Exits - Spilling Secrets Podcast - Employment Law This Week®
The FTC Takes Action Against Grubhub
What happens when a majority owner makes a bad-faith capital call?
Understanding Georgia's Civil Justice Climate With Commissioner John King — Regulatory Oversight Podcast
Mastering Legal Writing: Elevate Your Written Advocacy – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
The Ninth Circuit recently revived Monster Energy Company’s (“Monster Energy”) trademark and trade dress dispute against a company that markets camping equipment under the mark 4MONSTER. Monster Energy owns the well-known...more
The plaintiff, BDO USA, P.C. is an accounting and professional services advisory firm. The defendants are Ankura Consulting Group, LLC, Ankura’s CEO Kevin Lavin, and Phuoc Vin Phan....more
In an era of heightened regulatory scrutiny and unforgiving stakeholder expectations, internal investigations conducted on behalf of for-profit and not-for-profit organizations focused on employee embezzlement and financial...more
In today’s article, we examine Hofman v. Braun, 2025 N.Y. Slip Op. 34102(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Oct. 24, 2025) (here), a case addressing the statute of limitations for a breach of fiduciary duty claim and the continuous...more
This Veterans Day, Speaking of Litigation brings you a special episode featuring Epstein Becker Green attorneys Stuart Gerson, Jack Fernandez, Ron Green, and Ken Kelly, who share their unique journeys from military service to...more
A new government survey published on 5 November 2025 shows that external fraud against UK businesses is both widespread and under-recognised, revealing a persistent gap between corporate controls and confidence in their...more
In North Carolina, a business can be held liable under the legal doctrine of negligent entrustment if it allows an employee to drive a company vehicle when the business knew—or should have known—that the driver was unfit or...more
When Maria Brown-Lindsey and her brother inherited multiple rental properties in North Carolina upon their father's death in 2013, they saw an opportunity. The properties could be rented more profitably if they were repaired...more
On October 6, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the Federal Circuit’s decision in Crocs, Inc. v. Double Diamond Distrib., Ltd., et al., leaving a circuit split regarding Lanham Act false advertising claims...more
On August 20, 2025, the Ohio Supreme Court clarified the obligations of lenders and guarantors in arm’s-length financial transactions and declined to adopt the obligations set out by Section 124(1) of the Restatement (First)...more
In Quintara Biosciences Inc. v. Ruifeng Biztech Inc., the Ninth Circuit held that, unlike certain state trade secret statutes, the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) “does not require a plaintiff to identify with...more
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that it had jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from a district court’s denial of a California anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation)...more
Article 145 of the French Code of Civil Procedure allows claimants to request investigative measures “in futurum” (i.e., with a prospective view to future proceedings on the merits) provided that certain conditions are...more
In a lawsuit about sandwiches, the legal implications are anything but soft, and the stakes are high. The J.M. Smucker Company filed a federal lawsuit against Trader Joe’s, alleging that the grocery chain’s crustless peanut...more
Welcome to WilmerHale’s bulletin on recent trade secret case law and relevant news items. We’ve affectionately nicknamed it “Readily Ascertainable” because, unlike a trade secret, it should be easy to figure out....more
On October 21, a jury in West Palm Beach awarded $50M to one of the most revered and recognizable players in professional golf history, Jack Nicklaus. The award compensated Nicklaus for harm done to his reputation as a result...more
A recent coverage decision by the Delaware Superior Court in Motive Technologies, Inc. v. Associated Industries Insurance Company shows that examining the full timeline of allegations in a lawsuit can defeat policy exclusions...more
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) is well known for having outgrown its original purpose. No longer a mere tool for prosecuting the mob, today it casts a net over a range of garden variety...more
Properly pleading a federal claim for trade secret misappropriation can be a tricky endeavor. Since the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) was enacted in 2016, many federal courts have required plaintiffs to identify their...more
The Tenth Circuit recently held that an employee who failed to take adequate steps to protect confidential business information could not maintain claims against his former employer for trade secret misappropriation under...more
The North Carolina Business Court recently issued an opinion in Carolina Medical Partners, PLLC v. Shah. The case involves a flurry of litigation arising out of the breakup of a medical practice and allegations of impropriety...more
Corporate governance in the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (“KSA”) has seen significant evolution in recent years, with a stronger focus on accountability, transparency, and the enforcement of...more
On October 7, 2025, Judge James Patrick Hanlon of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granted in part and denied in part a brand name manufacturer of topical flea-and-tick products’ (the...more
Recent Delaware cases, including Pearce v. NeueHealth (2024) and Trifecta Multimedia Holdings v. WCG Clinical Services (2024), make clear that parties in M&A deals remain exposed to fraud claims when anti-reliance clauses are...more
How Businesses Can Protect Innovation in the Age of Machine Intelligence. In our continuing Defending the Algorithm™ series examining AI litigation and emerging risks, we now turn to trade secret protection. Following the...more