News & Analysis as of

Civil Procedure Intellectual Property Science, Computers & Technology

Read Civil Procedure updates, alerts, news, and legal analysis from leading lawyers and law firms:

Judge Andrews Issues Markman Ruling In Infringement Action Construing Eight (8) Disputed Terms In Patents-In-Suit

by Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., Civil Action No. 16-453-RGA (D.Del. January 17, 2018) (consolidated), the Court rendered its Markman...more

Prosecution History Informs Claim Meaning Even Without Unmistakable Disclaimer

by Foley & Lardner LLP on

Although non-precedential, the Federal Circuit decision in Aptalis Pharmatech, Inc. v. Apotex Inc. is worth a read to see how the court “tiptoes” the “fine line between reading a claim in light of the specification, and...more

PTAB Strategies and Insights - January 2018

The PTAB Strategies and Insights Newsletter is designed to be a valuable resource for all stakeholders in the global patent arena throughout the patent life cycle. To that end, articles will provide perspectives from both...more

PTAB Designates Informative Decisions on Timeliness of IPR Petitions

by Knobbe Martens on

In wake of the Federal Circuit’s Wi-Fi One decision, the PTAB has designated two of its decisions as informative on the issue of IPR petition timeliness under § 315(b). This statute provides that an IPR may not be instituted...more

Courts Can Review the PTAB’s Time-Bar Determination of IPR Institution

In Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., No. 2015-1944 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2018), the Federal Circuit, en banc, held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)’s time-bar determination under § 315(b) is reviewable. The Court...more

Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. HTC Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2018)

One of the most important (if not the most important) inquiries in performing due diligence involving acquisition of a patent portfolio is ensuring that the entity asserting ownership of the patents actually has proper title...more

Court releases final Unwired Planet v Huawei judgment and gives guidance on confidentiality in licensing disputes

by Allen & Overy LLP on

Final Unwired Planet v Huawei judgment published - On 30 November 2017 the High Court of England and Wales handed down two final judgments on confidentiality in Unwired Planet v Huawei: the final version of the substantive...more

En Banc Federal Circuit Finds PTAB Time Bar Determinations Appealable

by Finnegan – AIA Blog on

On January 10, the en banc Federal Circuit held in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp. that inter partes review time bar determinations under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) are appealable, and explicitly overruled Achates Reference...more

Federal Circuit "Blue Coat" Decision: Virus-Scanning Software Survives Alice Attack Applying "Enfish"

by Husch Blackwell LLP on

On January 10, 2018, the Federal Circuit added Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Sys., Inc., No. 2016-2520 (Fed. Cir.), to its Enfish jurisprudence and upheld the subject matter eligibility of a software patent directed to...more

Software Innovations Make Non-Abstract Improvements to Computer Technology

In Finjan, Inc., v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc., [2016-2520] (January 10, 2018), the Federal Circuit affirmed subject matter eligibility of U.S. Patent No. 6,154,844; affirmed infringement of the U.S. Patent Nos. 6,154,844 and...more

PTAB Life Sciences Report - January 2018

About the PTAB Life Sciences Report: Each month we will report on developments at the PTAB involving life sciences patents. Micro Labs Ltd. v. Santen Pharmaceutical Co. - PTAB Petition: IPR2017-01434; filed May 12,...more

An Arrow in the Quiver of Patent Owners: Federal Circuit Decides That Not All Aspects of PTAB’s Institution Decisions Are "Final...

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has decided that patent owners may appeal the decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) regarding the timeliness of inter partes review petitions under 35 U.S.C. §...more

Judge Andrews Issues Markman Ruling In Infringement Action Construing Nine (9) Disputed Terms In Patents-In-Suit

by Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Civil Action No. 16-812-RGA (D.Del. January 12, 2018), the Court rendered its Markman ruling...more

Top 10 Highlights of Canadian IP Law and Practice in 2017

by Smart & Biggar on

2017 was a year of significant developments to Canadian IP law and practice, with important court decisions and numerous legislative amendments. We have taken the opportunity to review the top 10 highlights from the past...more

Intellectual Property Newsletter - January 2018

by Shearman & Sterling LLP on

Shearman & Sterling’s IP litigation team has published its latest newsletter. The newsletter addresses a number of current IP topics, ranging from the constitutionality and judicial reviewability of inter partes review to...more

Federal Circuit Holds That PTAB’s Time-Bar Determinations Are Appealable

by Goodwin on

On January 8, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its en banc decision in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., No. 2015-1944. The Federal Circuit originally held that due to binding precedent, a time-bar determination under 35...more

2017 – It was biotech and pharma who kept the Australian legal system busy

by FPA Patent Attorneys on

2016 saw the Australian legal system deal with the questions that ranged from defining a human being to defining an inventor. 2017 proved to be just as interesting, and just as informative for patentees and applicants as to...more

Just in Time: Federal Court of Appeals Reconsiders Prior Decision on Availability of Judicial Review of IPRs

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reconsiders its previous decision on the availability of judicial review of IPRs. The statutes, namely 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(d) and 315(b), governing institution of inter partes...more

Rx IP Update - 2017 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP

by Smart & Biggar on

The year 2017 was one of the most significant years for Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law in Canada’s history. The year saw major developments in patent linkage, patent term, and substantive patent issues. As we...more

Inducement After Importation Actionable Under Section 337

by Jones Day on

Complainants often must rely on indirect infringement to prove a violation of Section 337. Indirect infringement may be in the form of induced or contributory infringement. In a recent opinion, the Commission clarified issues...more

Federal Circuit Loosens Constraints on Appeals of PTAB Decisions

Judicial review of post-grant patent proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is limited, but a federal court of appeals has somewhat loosened the restriction. On January 8, 2018, in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom...more

Liability for Inducement Where There is Divided Infringement

by Workman Nydegger on

In 2017, the Federal Circuit issued a decision Eli Lilly & Co. v. Teva Parenteral Meds., Inc., 845 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2017) that found Teva liable for inducement of method claims in U.S. Patent No. 7,772,209 even though no...more

Broader Reading of IPR Estoppel Foreclosed by Shaw

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently found that the scope of inter partes review estoppel was limited to only those grounds specifically instituted in an IPR proceeding, applying the standard set...more

Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc.

by Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Dyk, Linn, and Hughes. Appeal from the Northern District of California. Summary: Claims directed to behavior-based virus scanning, as opposed to the traditional code-matching method,...more

Wifi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp: Petitions for Inter Partes Review Are Time-barred Are Reviewable On Appeal

by Fish & Richardson on

On January 8, 2018, the Federal Circuit sitting en banc issued its decision in Wifi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., No. 2015-1944, holding that PTAB decisions with respect to whether petitions for inter partes review are...more

4,838 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 194
Cybersecurity

Follow Civil Procedure Updates on:

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.