News & Analysis as of

Amgen Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Consider “Full Scope” Enablement of Claims

On November 4, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to review the Federal Circuit’s decision in Amgen Inc., v. Sanofi. Certiorari was limited to the question of whether the enablement...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Not Backing Down Now – Multiple Amicus Curiae Briefs Filed for Amgen v. Sanofi

At the end of last month, three amicus curiae briefs were filed following the petition for a writ of certiorari in the Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi, Inc. case. We previously discussed the petition for a writ of certiorari in detail...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

A Potential Pivot in Patent Procedure – Will the Supreme Court Hear Amgen’s Challenge to the Standard of Review for Enablement?

As we have previously discussed, on February 11, 2021, the Federal Circuit decided Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sanofi, Aventisub LLC, et al. The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of JMOL that Amgen’s Repatha®...more

Kilpatrick

Amgen Petitions for Certiorari to Reconsider Enablement of Genus Claims

Kilpatrick on

As we reported earlier this year, Amgen filed a petition for rehearing en banc to the Federal Circuit, arguing that the panel in Amgen v. Sanofi improperly created a new and heightened test for enablement of genus claims with...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi

The Supreme Court denied certiorari last week in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, in a case that asked the Court to review the Federal Circuit's jurisprudence related to the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112(a)....more

Goodwin

Year in Review: Top Five Legal Developments of 2017

Goodwin on

Here are our picks for the top-five most significant legal developments regarding biosimilars in 2017...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision Interpreting the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act

On June 12, the Supreme Court decided Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., the first case under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA) to reach the high court. The BPCIA establishes a regulatory pathway for...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court to Review BPCIA -- Amgen v. Sandoz Petitions for Writs of Certiorari Granted

On Friday, the Supreme Court granted both petitions for writs of certiorari and consolidated the Sandoz v. Amgen (No. 15-1039) and Amgen v. Sandoz (No. 15-1195) appeals. Sandoz had petitioned the Court on February 16, 2016...more

Goodwin

Breaking News: Supreme Court Grants Petition and Cross-Petition for Certiorari in Amgen v. Sandoz

Goodwin on

The Supreme Court has granted Sandoz’s petition for certiorari, and Amgen’s cross-petition for certiorari in Amgen v. Sandoz. The Order is excerpted below and can be found here...more

Goodwin

Amgen Files Opposition to Apotex’s Petition for Certiorari

Goodwin on

On November 8, 2016, Amgen submitted a brief in opposition to Apotex’s petition for certiorari challenging the Federal Circuit’s application of its holding in Amgen v. Sandoz that subsection (l)(8)(A) of the BPCIA allows an...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Apotex Prevails in Neulasta Biosimilar Litigation, Files for Cert on 180-Day Issue

Among the first generation of biosimilar litigation under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) is a dispute between Amgen and Apotex over Apotex’s proposed biosimilar versions of Amgen’s Neupogen...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Apotex to Supreme Court: Review BPCIA 180-Day Notice Requirement

On September 9, 2016, Apotex Inc. filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court seeking review of the Federal Circuit’s decision in Amgen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., Case No. 2016-1308. This case involves...more

Goodwin

Amgen v. Apotex, Petition for Certiorari

Goodwin on

We have been closely following the Amgen v. Apotex case. On September 9, 2016, Apotex petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari to review the Federal Circuit’s decision. In its petition, Apotex presents two questions for...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Requires 180 Day Notice For All Biosimilars, Even After Patent Dance

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Amgen v. Apotex, the Federal Circuit rejected Apotex’s arguments that the 180-day pre-marketing notice requirement does not apply to biosimilar applicants who participated in the “patent dance” process of the Biologics...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court Defers Certiorari Decision In Amgen Sandoz Biosimilar Patent Dance Dispute

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On June 20, 2016, instead of deciding whether to grant certiorari in the biosimilar patent dance dispute between Amgen and Sandoz, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General “to file a brief in this case expressing the...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court asks SG for views on Sandoz, Amgen petitions: Analysis and Next Steps

Goodwin on

As we posted on June 20, the Supreme Court has invited the Solicitor General to file briefs regarding the Sandoz v. Amgen and Amgen v. Sandoz petitions for certiorari. Below we provide further analysis and commentary on the...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court asks the SG to Weigh in on Sandoz v. Amgen and Amgen v. Sandoz Petitions

Goodwin on

On June 20, 2016, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs regarding the Sandoz v. Amgen and Amgen v. Sandoz petitions for certiorari...more

Goodwin

Amgen v. Sandoz: Reply Briefs Submitted to Supreme Court

Goodwin on

As we previously reported, on February 16, 2016, Sandoz petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari regarding the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of the BPCIA’s “notice of commercial marketing”...more

Goodwin

Amgen v. Sandoz: Sandoz’s Opposition to Amgen’s Conditional Cross-Petition for Certiorari

Goodwin on

As we covered in a previous post, following the Federal Circuit’s decision in Amgen v. Sandoz, Sandoz filed a petition for a writ of certiorari asking the Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Amgen Hedges Its Bets With Cross-Petition For Certiorari Of Biosimilar Decision

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Although Amgen originally did not petition the Supreme Court for certiorari to review the first Federal Circuit decision interpreting the BPCIA framework for resolving biosimilar patent disputes, Amgen now has filed a...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Sandoz Asks Supreme Court To Reverse Biosimilar Decision

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On February 16, 2016, Sandoz, Inc. filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, asking the Court to overturn the Federal Circuit decision that interpreted the “patent dance” provisions of the Biologics Price...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Amgen Declines to Seek Cert in Amgen v. Sandoz

Amgen has decided not to seek Supreme Court review of the Federal Circuit’s Amgen v. Sandoz decision, as the January 14, 2016 deadline to file has now passed without Amgen petitioning for certiorari. Amgen v. Sandoz is...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Federal Circuit Denies En Banc Petition in Amgen v. Sandoz

The Federal Circuit today denied the petitions for rehearing by the panel and rehearing by the en banc Court filed by both parties in Amgen v. Sandoz. Amgen had petitioned for rehearing on the panel's decision that the...more

23 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide