News & Analysis as of

Breach of Contract › Insurance Litigation › Homeowner's Insurance

Marshall Dennehey

Florida Statute § 627.70152 Applies to All Insurance Policies, Regardless of the Date of the Policy’s Inception

Marshall Dennehey on

Sanchez v. Security First Insurance Co., No. 3D22-1109 (Fla. 3d DCA Mar. 6, 2024) - In March, the Third District Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of a complaint for its failure to comply with Florida Statute § 627.70152....more

Marshall Dennehey

Third District’s Decision Confirms that the Future of Florida’s Pre-Suit Notice Requirement Remains Uncertain

Marshall Dennehey on

The Third District Court of Appeals of Florida is the latest to join the growing number of Florida appellate courts that have ruled that the pre-suit notice provision of section 627.70152 is procedural in nature and, as such,...more

Carlton Fields

New Jersey Court Holds Primary Home Insurer Must Cover Dog Bite Injury at Insured’s Second Home

Carlton Fields on

In Berardi v. FMI Insurance Co., a panel of New Jersey’s Superior Court, Appellate Decision, affirmed a lower court’s ruling, which ordered a primary home insurer to defend its insured in a dog bite lawsuit, stemming from...more

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP

A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP on

The presuit notice requirements of section 627.70152, Florida Statutes, are procedural in nature and, therefore, apply retroactively to insurance policies existing at the time the law was enacted (July 1, 2021).  Herman Cole...more

Carlton Fields

Florida Court Determines Insurer Did Not Waive Right to Appraisal in Hurricane Irma Claim Brought by Homeowners

Carlton Fields on

Various homeowner’s insurance policies contain an appraisal clause that a carrier or insured may invoke in situations where there is a dispute in damages between the parties. ...more

White and Williams LLP

No Such Thing as “Institutional Bad Faith,” Pennsylvania Superior Court Concludes

White and Williams LLP on

“[T]here is no separate cause of action of institutional bad faith,” the Pennsylvania Superior Court recently concluded, referencing Pennsylvania’s bad-faith statute, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8731, in an action by two homeowners against...more

Carlton Fields

The Three “Musts” for a Competent Affidavit or Declaration

Carlton Fields on

Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal recently issued a decision that serves as a reminder not to take for granted a proposition that most practicing attorneys regularly encounter: a motion for summary judgment must be...more

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

Ohio Court Holds Stolen Cryptocurrency Constitutes Covered Property Under Homeowner’s Policy

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog on

A little over a month ago, a judge in Franklin County, Ohio, held that Bitcoin—a popular form of cryptocurrency—constitutes covered “property” under the terms of a traditional homeowner’s policy. In Kimmelman v. Wayne...more

Jaburg Wilk

Arizona Court of Appeals Holds Insureds May Assign a Post-Loss Breach of Contract Claim to Contractors

Jaburg Wilk on

The Holding - In Farmers Ins. Exchange v. The Honorable David Udall, 2018 WL 2931906 (June 12, 2018), the Arizona Court of Appeals accepted special action jurisdiction to hold that Insureds validly assigned post-loss...more

Robinson+Cole Property Insurance Coverage...

Freezing Exclusion: Third Circuit Affirms District Court’s Grant Of Summary Judgment To Insurer

Robinson+Cole Property Insurance Coverage... on

Many typical homeowner’s insurance policies contain an exclusion for damages as a result of freezing unless the homeowner uses “reasonable care” to maintain heat in the home....more

Jaburg Wilk

Arizona Allows Insured to Avoid Removal by Naming Adjuster as Defendant

Jaburg Wilk on

In Chukly v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2017 WL 3262541 (D.Ariz. Aug. 1, 2017) (Order), a breach of contract and insurance bad faith case arising from a homeowners claim after a microburst and “massive rain,” the Arizona...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Too Soon! First Circuit Finds No Duty To Defend Before Suit Is Filed

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

Can something short of the filing of a complaint trigger an insurer’s duty to defend? It’s not an idle question. Uncertainty on this issue could produce an unintended breach, and, in some jurisdictions, breach of the duty to...more

Cozen O'Connor

Genuine Dispute Defeats Both Bad Faith and Elder Abuse

Cozen O'Connor on

The Paslays sued State Farm for failing to pay a portion of the damage caused to their Pacific Palisades house by a heavy rainstorm and for forcing them to move back into the house while it was still under construction. The...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Insurance Recovery Law - July 2015 #2

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on

California Court: Rejected Demand Within Policy Limits Not Necessary for Bad Faith Claim - Why it matters: Insurers must proceed with caution when they become aware that a settlement within policy limits is possible,...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

Court Holds That Trimming of Neighbor’s Trees is Not an Insured Accident or Occurrence

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on

In Albert v. Mid-Century Insurance Co. (No. B257792, filed 4/28/15, ord. pub. 5/20/15), a California Court of Appeal held that an insured’s trimming of a neighbor’s trees which allegedly damaged the trees was not an accident...more

15 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide