News & Analysis as of

Daubert Standards

Cornerstone Research

Unlocking AI’s Potential in Expert Witness Work

Cornerstone Research on

Generative AI (AI) is creating exciting opportunities in the realm of complex litigation and expert witness preparation. The technology offers meaningful value that ultimately allows experts to focus their time on high-level...more

MG+M The Law Firm

Ethylene Oxide: The Next Wave of Toxic Tort Litigation?

MG+M The Law Firm on

Ethylene oxide (EtO) is a naturally occurring, colorless gas compound used primarily in the sterilization of medical and dental equipment, in construction, and in transportation. It can also be found in various consumer...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

The Ninth Circuit’s Latest Word on Expert Testimony: A Cautionary Tale for Expert Witnesses in Toxic Tort Litigation

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In August 2025, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision to exclude an expert’s causation opinion as unreliable and grant summary judgment in favor of a herbicide manufacturer.The case, which arose from claims...more

Marshall Dennehey

District Court Holds that Daubert Evidentiary Challenges Do Not Apply to Expert Medical Opinions under Florida’s Workers’...

Marshall Dennehey on

Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Services v. Thompson, Fla. 1st DCA, No. 1D2023-0193, Sept. 3, 2025 - In this matter of first impression, Florida’s First District Court of Appeal addressed whether Florida Statutes Section 440.25(4)(d)...more

Hogan Lovells

Fourth Circuit Denies Rehearing in Case With Major Implications for Article III Standing and Trial Court’s Role as Gatekeeper for...

Hogan Lovells on

Last week, the Fourth Circuit denied defendants' petition for rehearing in Sommerville v. Union Carbide, a proposed class action for medical monitoring for alleged exposure to emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO). The denial of...more

BCLP

Georgia Courts Must Follow Federal Standard for Toxic Tort Experts, Appeals Court Rules

BCLP on

The Georgia Court of Appeals issued a decision on October 31, 2025, addressing the reliability and admissibility of expert testimony on general causation in toxic tort cases in Georgia. See Sterigenics US LLC. Mutz, No....more

Secretariat

Understanding Difference-in-Differences and Choosing The Best Tool For Antitrust Economic Analyses

Secretariat on

Econometrics, the application of statistical methods to economic data, can be instrumental in the identification of anticompetitive behavior by assisting in analyses including the assessment of market power, the evaluation of...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Close, But Not Quite: Eastern District of North Carolina Excludes Experts Whose General Expertise Does Not Enable Specific...

Even “[a] supremely qualified expert cannot waltz into the courtroom and render opinions” unless those opinions pass muster under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Clark v. Takata Corp., 192 F.3d 750, 759 n.5 (7th Cir. 1999). As...more

IMS Legal Strategies

The Impact of Vocational Experts in Injury-Related Litigation

IMS Legal Strategies on

When a serious injury disrupts someone’s ability to work and earn money, the ripple effects are immediate and far-reaching. Questions about employability, lost wages, and future earning capacity can quickly become central to...more

Mayer Brown

Department of Health and Human Services Links Prenatal Tylenol Use to Autism: Expanding Litigation Risks for Manufacturers,...

Mayer Brown on

On September 22, 2025, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a report highlighting alleged consistent associations between in utero acetaminophen (Tylenol) exposure and later diagnoses of autism spectrum...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Fourth Circuit Revives Ethylene Oxide Medical Monitoring Suit, Expanding Article III Standing for Environmental Exposure Claims

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

On August 18, 2025, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed a district court order dismissing an ethylene oxide (“EtO”) exposure case for lack of Article III standing. The majority in...more

Mintz - Technology, Communications & Media...

Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Litigation Update — September 2025

In a notable ruling for Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently affirmed a district court’s decision to exclude a plaintiff’s expert witness and deny...more

Zelle  LLP

NCAA Volunteer Coach Victory: Key Takeaways from a Successful Antitrust Class Certification

Zelle LLP on

Eastern District of California Judge William B. Shubb certified a class of thousands of former NCAA Division I volunteer coaches who had sued the NCAA for anticompetitive compensation prohibitions. Originally published in...more

Burr & Forman

Fourth Circuit Affirms Denial of Class Certification in TCPA Prerecorded Call Case

Burr & Forman on

Davis v. Capital One, N.A., No. 24-1507, 2025 WL 2445880 (4th Cir. Aug. 25, 2025). Background. Defendant made prerecorded calls to Plaintiff, a non-customer, attempting to reach a customer that had provided consent...more

IMS Legal Strategies

[Webinar] Elevate | The Impact of Vocational Experts in Injury-Related Litigation - August 28th, 11:00 am CT

IMS Legal Strategies on

In high-stakes personal injury litigation, a qualified vocational expert with proven experience can mean the difference between a credible damages narrative and one that falls apart under scrutiny. Join IMS on Thursday,...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Clearing the Weeds: The Ninth Circuit Confirms that There is Not (And Never Has Been) a Presumption of Admissibility in Its Case...

The judge overseeing the In re Roundup Products Liability Litigation MDL once remarked that “When you [consider] Ninth Circuit law, you come away with a pretty strong feeling that the Ninth Circuit is more tolerant of shaky...more

McAfee & Taft

Gavel to Gavel: Trust me, I’m an expert

McAfee & Taft on

The use of expert testimony in litigation is often a minefield of questionable “expertise” and even more questionable methodology. What was originally intended to allow scientists, engineers and doctors to explain complex...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Defining the Limits of Lay Testimony in Complicated Products Cases

“So when is a question too complicated for the jury?” That is the question the Third Circuit sought to answer recently in Slatowski v. Sig Sauer, Inc., ___ F. 4th ___, 2025 WL 2178533 (3d Cir. 2025), reversing a district...more

IMS Legal Strategies

Effective Strategies for Daubert and Robinson Challenges

IMS Legal Strategies on

In high-stakes litigation, expert testimony that cannot withstand a Daubert or Robinson challenge can derail even the most well-prepared case. A failed Daubert or Robinson challenge can leave attorneys without their key...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

From confidential to careless: The case of the unprotected customer list

The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment dismissal of a trade secret misappropriation complaint, finding that the plaintiff failed to take reasonable measures to maintain the secrecy of a...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Message Received – Delaware Follows Federal Rule of Evidence 702

The Delaware Superior Court took the mass tort world by surprise with its May 31, 2024, refusal to exclude the plaintiffs’ experts’ causation opinions in the Zantac litigation, breaking with the federal MDL court’s prior...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Dim damages methods can doom bright ideas

In a mixed ruling on evidentiary exclusions and damages methodology, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded a district court’s decision that excluded...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Double Take: Fifth Circuit’s Dual BELO Rulings Show Both General and Specific Causation Are Essential

We previously blogged about a decision in the In re Deepwater Horizon BELO litigation – Ruffin v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. – in which the Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for defendants in an alleged chemical...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases: Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance, Co. Ltd. v. CH Lighting Technology Co., Ltd.

Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance, Co. Ltd. v. CH Lighting Technology Co., Ltd., Appeal No. 2023-1715 (Fed. Cir. July 28, 2025) In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit addressed three issues arising from a...more

A&O Shearman

Evidence Exclusion And Daubert Motion Denials Must Be Supported By Valid Legal Rule And Reasoning; Damage Calculation Must Account...

A&O Shearman on

In Jiaxing Super Lighting Elec. Appliance, Co. v. CH Lighting Tech. Co., Ltd, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reviewed the judgment in a patent infringement case involving three patents owned by Jiaxing Super...more

271 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 11

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide