News & Analysis as of

Dave & Buster's

Cozen O'Connor

The State AG Report – 6.15.2023

Cozen O'Connor on

Here are curated AG and federal regulatory news stories highlighting key areas in which state and federal regulators’ decisions are having an impact across the US: •AGs Say AI is Risky Business, Requires Government...more

Cozen O'Connor

Busted! Dave & Buster’s Pays Up for Alleged Labor Violations

Cozen O'Connor on

Massachusetts AG Andrea Campbell settled with Dave & Buster’s of Massachusetts, Inc. to resolve allegations that the company violated the Commonwealth’s labor laws relating to meal breaks and child labor....more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Cutting Employee Hours to Avoid ACA Requirements Costs Employer $7.4 Million

In response to the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) 30-hour threshold for employee coverage, many employers, including retailers and restaurants, considered cutting employee hours to avoid offering health insurance....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Telephone Access Might Be Valid Alternative to Accessible Website, But Court Needs More

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In denying Dave & Buster’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment, a federal judge said that telephonic access might be an alternative to having an accessible website, but cannot decide until the...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Direct-to-Consumer Equity Offerings: Are Loyal Customers Happy Shareholders?

“Direct-to-consumer” offerings enable companies to raise capital directly from their customers, with or without the use of underwriters or other financial intermediaries. Direct-to-consumer offerings have garnered attention...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Can the ACA Employer Health-Insurance Mandate Be Avoided by Reducing Employees’ Hours? McGuireWoods Healthcare Reform Guide:...

McGuireWoods LLP on

This is the 56th in a series of WorkCite articles concerning the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and its companion statute, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (referred to collectively as the...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Attempting to Avoid the Affordable Care Act’s Mandate by Reducing Hours Provokes ERISA Class Action Challenge

Employers nationwide are closely watching a class action lawsuit out of federal court in New York in which current and former employees have brought ERISA claims against restaurant chain Dave & Buster’s (“D&B”). In Marin v....more

Fisher Phillips

Limiting Employee Hours To Avoid ACA Could Violate ERISA, Court Rules

Fisher Phillips on

In a first-of-its-kind decision, a federal court recently upheld the right of employees to sue their employer for allegedly cutting employee hours to less than 30 hours per week to avoid offering health insurance under the...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Cutting Employee Hours to Avoid Offering Healthcare? Your Risk of a Lawsuit Just Increased!

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

The Affordable Care Act requires an applicable large employer to offer healthcare coverage to its full-time employees or risk paying a penalty. An employee is considered full-time for this purpose if they work at least 30...more

Franczek P.C.

Important Development in Dave & Buster’s Lawsuit Regarding Whether Cutting Employee Work Hours Violates ERISA

Franczek P.C. on

In a case of first impression that is being closely watched by plaintiffs’ attorneys and large employers alike, a federal judge recently ruled against a motion brought by Dave & Buster’s, the restaurant chain, to dismiss a...more

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider

Dave & Buster’s faces FCRA class action for alleged background check violations

Joseph Alvarez filed a class action against Dave & Buster’s restaurant chain earlier this year in Florida alleging that it used background checks for employment decisions without providing a copy of the report to the...more

Kilpatrick

Liability under ERISA for Reducing Work Schedules?

Kilpatrick on

Earlier this week, the Southern District of New York denied a motion to dismiss a case against Dave & Buster’s, Inc. – a development that is sure to concern many employers around the country. This case, Marin v. Dave &...more

Balch & Bingham LLP

Questionable Retaliation Theory Gets Traction

Balch & Bingham LLP on

Since our earliest postings, we have warned of a notion, prevalent among employee counsel, that an employer plan sponsor unlawfully retaliates against an employee by reducing her work hours in order to deprive her of ACA...more

King & Spalding

Gaming the System? ERISA Interference Lawsuit Targets ACA-Driven Reduction of Hours Strategy

King & Spalding on

In a case believed to be the first of its kind, a recent class action claim has accused an employer of reducing hours of employees to avoid having to provide health coverage as required under the Patient Protection and...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Benefits Litigation Update – July 2015

Epstein Becker & Green on

Welcome to the new, rejuvenated version of the Benefits Litigation Update, which we bring you jointly with the law firm of Epstein Becker Green. Our goal is to provide a concise and, we hope, insightful glimpse into recent...more

Snell & Wilmer

May Companies Reduce Employee Hours to Avoid ACA Requirements?

Snell & Wilmer on

The Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) generally requires that large employers offer health coverage that meets certain requirements to their full-time employees (i.e., employees working 30 hours or more per week) and their...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide