News & Analysis as of

Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) › Article III

Foley & Lardner LLP

Fourth Circuit Holds No Article III Standing Where No Third-Party Viewed Inaccurate Information

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On September 11, 2024, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that there is no publication to a third party — and therefore no Article III standing under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) — where the recipient of a...more

Troutman Pepper

After Remand from Supreme Court, TransUnion v. Ramirez Parties Reach Class Settlement

Troutman Pepper on

Last June, the Supreme Court issued a noteworthy decision in the TransUnion v. Ramirez case, holding that the vast majority of an 8,000-plus member Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) class lacked standing because they had not...more

ArentFox Schiff

Class Actions Quarterly Update: Supreme Court - September 2021

ArentFox Schiff on

The latest trends and developments in the class action world. Since our last update was published, the United States Supreme Court has addressed a number of appeals involving class actions. Requirement of Concrete...more

Blank Rome LLP

Data Breach Class Actions: U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Tilt the Odds in Favor of Defendant Organizations

Blank Rome LLP on

Corporate defendants besieged by proliferating bet-the-company privacy and consumer class action lawsuits recently scored a victory in the US Supreme Court with implications for data breach victims. Originally published in...more

King & Spalding

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Pivotal Article III Standing Opinion, Reversing $40 Million Judgment in FCRA Class Action

King & Spalding on

On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a decision in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, a highly anticipated appeal that we previously covered in our March and December issues last year. In a 5–4 opinion, the Supreme Court...more

Butler Snow LLP

SCOTUS reaffirms standing requires “a harm traditionally recognized as providing a basis for a lawsuit in American courts,”...

Butler Snow LLP on

Recently, we have written about the “entrepreneurial model” of lawyer-driven class actions and how a case’s entrepreneurial features can give rise to various defenses, including lack of standing. As we’ve explained, where...more

Wiley Rein LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Circuit Split – Privacy Suits Require Concrete Harm for Article III Standing

Wiley Rein LLP on

On June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court decided TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, holding that only plaintiffs concretely harmed by a defendant’s statutory violation have Article III standing to seek damages against the private...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court Addresses Class Action Standing in Ramirez Case: Requires “Concrete” Injury for Article III Standing for Class...

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

The Supreme Court further limited consumer lawsuits in TransUnion, LLC v. Ramirez, siding with credit reporting agency TransUnion in a 5-4 decision holding that thousands of consumers improperly flagged as potential...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

Relief For The Unharmed: Supreme Court Considers Whether Article III & Rule 23 Permit Certification Where Most Class Members Are...

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed on

The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly declined to resolve a question that has sharply divided the Circuits: whether a class may be certified even though it contains uninjured members. See e.g., Tyson Foods, Inc. v....more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Considers Standing and Typicality for No-Injury Class Actions in TransUnion v. Ramirez Oral Argument

Troutman Pepper on

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, a case in which the Supreme Court is once again grappling with the requirements of Article III standing — this time in the context of class...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Do All Class Members Have Standing For Mere Statutory Violations? The Supreme Court Will Decide

Proskauer - Minding Your Business on

On March 30, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether a damages class action, is permitted by Article III of the Constitution or Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure where the majority of the class has...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

U. S. Supreme Court to Consider Article III Standing for Absent Class Members in Review of Ninth Circuit Decision

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The United States Supreme Court has again granted a petition to examine standing in the context of class actions, specifically whether Article III of the Constitution permits members of a certified class to recover money...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court to Address Class Action Standing in Ramirez Case: To Recover, Must Absent Class Members Establish Actual Injury?

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari on December 16, 2020 in TransUnion, LLC v. Ramirez on the question of “[w]hether either Article III or Rule 23 permits a damages class action where the vast majority of the class...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Supreme Court to Review Article III Standing Requirement for Absent Class Members

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court granted review last week in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, which presents the question of whether Article III or Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a damages class action where most...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

Ninth Circuit Addresses FCRA Standing Analysis And Emphasizes Importance Of Remedial Measures

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed on

The Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion addressing standing and willfulness under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). In Ramirez v. TransUnion, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a jury verdict and punitive damages award,...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Ninth Circuit Examines Standing for Class Members, Upholds $8 Million FCRA Jury Award for Statutory Damages but Reduces...

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On February 27, 2020, in a 2-1 decision, the Ninth Circuit in Ramirez v. TransUnion, LLC held that every member of the class must have standing in order to recover damages at the final judgment stage.  Judge McKeown filed a...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

9th Circuit Holds All Members of a Certified Class Must Have Article III Standing To Recover Monetary Damages

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

- In a matter of first impression within the 9th Circuit, the court held that each member of a certified class must have Article III standing in order to recover individual monetary damages at trial. - Those class members...more

Littler

Ninth Circuit Rules Only Named Plaintiff Must Have Article III Standing For Class Certification

Littler on

In Ramirez v. Trans Union, the Ninth Circuit addressed whether, at the class certification stage of a putative class case, only the named plaintiff or all class members must have Article III standing (i.e., a concrete injury...more

Dechert LLP

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Rejects Aiding and Abetting Liability for Civil Damage Claims Under the...

Dechert LLP on

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion on February 14, 2013, holding that the civil liability provision of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1990, 18 U.S.C.§ 2333(a) (the “ATA”) does not permit...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide