News & Analysis as of

Patent Applications Patent Term Adjustment Intellectual Property Protection

Saul Ewing LLP

What Intellectual Property Owners Need to Know Today About Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

Saul Ewing LLP on

What You Need to Know: • Instead of filing multiple applications claiming different aspects of an invention but not sharing a single priority chain, patentees should strive to file highly comprehensive applications that...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Leveraging USPTO Delays To Maximize Patent Term

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Before the USPTO was subject to a hiring freeze, it assumed it would onboard 400 new examiners between fiscal year 2025 and fiscal year 2026, and still predicted an increase in the backlog of unexamined patent applications....more

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Intellectual Property Report March 2025

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

This Article analyzes over 89,000 patents litigated over a twenty-year period to determine how the number of office actions to allowance during prosecution impacts rates of invalidity during subsequent litigation. Many...more

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Maximizing Patent Term in the United States: Patent Term Adjustment, Patent Term Extension, and the Evolving Law of...

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

Under U.S. law, most patents are limited to a term of 20 years from the earliest nonprovisional filing date. However, Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) and Patent Term Extension (PTE) can be used in certain circumstances to gain...more

Smart & Biggar

Navigating unity of invention and double patenting issues: practical strategies for patent protection in Canada

Smart & Biggar on

Unity of invention and double patenting law and practice in Canada can create challenges for patent applicants. For example, applicants may not expect a unity of invention objection to be raised, requiring claims to be...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian patent law 2024: a year in review

Smart & Biggar on

2024 was an active year in Canadian patent law, with the Federal Court issuing several decisions on the merits regarding invalidity and/or infringement. The courts also considered issues of the regulation of patent agents,...more

Jones Day

USPTO Launches Significant Patent Fee Increases

Jones Day on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") raised patent fees and introduced new surcharges....more

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC

Fee Changes for Patent Matters

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced changes to patent fees, which will take effect on Jan 19, 2025. Most current fees are subject to a 7.5% across-the-board increase while other fees are...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Understanding the USPTO's Final Rule on Fee Adjustments for Patent Applications and Appeals

Troutman Pepper Locke on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued a “final rule” to fee adjustments for patent applications and appeals, effective January 19, 2025. These changes represent some of the most significant changes to the...more

Cooley LLP

Federal Circuit Limits In re Cellect, Preserving PTA for First-Filed, First-Issued Patents Within a Family

Cooley LLP on

On August 13, 2024, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held in Allergan v. MSN that “a first-filed, first-issued, later-expiring claim” cannot be invalidated for obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) “by a...more

Kilpatrick

First-filed, Later-Expiring Patent Protected from Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Post In re Cellect

Kilpatrick on

The recent In re Cellect decision by the Federal Circuit1 is significant for patent owners who have obtained patent-term adjusted patents in the same patent family. The court held that term-adjusted patents can be potentially...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

EDVA Upholds USPTO’s Calculation of Patent Term Adjustment

Troutman Pepper Locke on

Under the patent laws, the term of a patent may be increased for delays by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) during the application process. See 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(1). Conversely, the USPTO can reduce a patent term...more

Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.

Wolf Greenfield Attorneys Preview What’s Ahead in 2024

2024 is upon us and it’s going to be another busy year for intellectual property law. In this episode of IP Talk with Wolf Greenfield, you’ll hear Wolf Greenfield attorneys from a variety of practice areas offering their...more

Venable LLP

[Ongoing Program] Life Sciences Series - Current Trends in ANDA Litigation - October 31st, 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm ET

Venable LLP on

We are excited to announce Venable’s inaugural Life Sciences Webinar Series. This month-long series will explore the intricacies and latest developments that shape the life sciences industry. Join us as we hear from our...more

American Conference Institute (ACI)

[Webinar] 3rd Annual Passport to Proficiency on the Essentials of Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA - October 10th - 26th, 1:00 pm EST

Gain a comprehensive understanding of Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA essentials, a critical competency for legal and business professionals in the biopharmaceutical arena. Attend ACI’s Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA Proficiency Series...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Mind Your Ps and Qs, and Your PTAs Too

Last week, the Federal Circuit held that obviousness-type double patenting trumps patent term adjustment, opening the door for invalidity attacks that to date had been questionable. In re Cellect was an appeal from a...more

Smart & Biggar

Proposed legislation for patent term adjustment, and the interplay with CSPs

Smart & Biggar on

Bill C-47, “An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 28, 2023,” aka “Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1” is an omnibus bill that includes proposed amendments to the Patent Act to...more

Smart & Biggar

A first look at Canada’s proposed patent term adjustment system

Smart & Biggar on

Bill C-47, entitled “An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 28, 2023,” had its first reading in the House of Commons on April 20, 2023. This omnibus bill includes proposed...more

Knobbe Martens

Patent Term Adjustment Under 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(C)(iii) Requires Reversal of Adverse Determination of Patentability

Knobbe Martens on

Summary: When a patent claim is subject to adverse determinations of patentability first before the PTO and again after appeal, the claim is not entitled to patent term adjustment for the period of the appeal even if the...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

The USPTO May Be Miscalculating Patent Term Adjustments

Troutman Pepper Locke on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office released a final rule on June 16, 2020, to revise how it calculates patent term adjustment. But the USPTO’s PTA algorithm does not yet fully account for its final rule. Originally...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Patent Term Adjustment PTO Calculation Does Not Fully Reflect 2020 Rule Change

Troutman Pepper Locke on

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released a final rule on June 16, 2020, revising how it will calculate Patent Term Adjustment (PTA). However, the USPTO's PTA algorithm does not yet (as of March 2022) fully...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

After Supernus: It’s Up to You to Keep Your Patent Alive All Its Days

Patentees may obtain additional PTA if the USPTO’s calculation of “applicant delay” includes a period of time during which the patentee could have taken “no identifiable effort” to avoid. However, the onus is entirely on the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Intellectual Property Law Year in Review - March 2019

McDermott Will & Emery on

In the continuously evolving world of intellectual property law, 2018 was another milestone year. The US Supreme Court and Federal Circuit continued to define key aspects of intellectual property (IP) law including: •...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Federal Circuit Partially Clarifies Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Law in Two Opinions Released the Same Day

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued two opinions on December 7 that address two unsettled questions relating to obviousness-type double patenting (OTDP). These issues are of particular interest to...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Just Became Less of a Problem for Innovators

Troutman Pepper Locke on

The Federal Circuit recently issued a pair of decisions concerning the Gilead doctrine, which allowed later-issuing patents to be obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) references against earlier-issuing patents....more

26 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide