News & Analysis as of

Patent Litigation Patent Royalties

McDermott Will & Emery

The Conversation Continues: Some Post-Patent-Termination Royalties Are Acceptable

McDermott Will & Emery on

For the second time in less than two weeks, a circuit court decided an appeal hinging on the Brulotte rule, which holds that patent royalties are impermissible when based on payments for the use of expired patents. Like the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Some Post-Expiration Patent Royalty Payments May Be OK

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court’s finding that a contract impermissibly allowed for patent royalties after the patent expired because the post-termination royalty payments were...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

No Damages, No Injunction . . . and No Opposition?

The Federal Circuit will hear oral argument on March 5, 2024, in In re: California Expanded Metal Products, Co., No. 23-1140, a case that presents two intriguing issues regarding patent remedies. The first issue is the...more

Smith Anderson

WHITE PAPER | Key Patent Developments of 2023

Smith Anderson on

In a noteworthy year for patent law, the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued several decisions that will shape the patent landscape and the Federal Rules of Evidence governing...more

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up: April 2023

Fish & Richardson on

Four subjects stood out in patent litigation in Texas in April 2023: (1) applicability of the customer-suit exception to the first-to-file rule; (2) the level of ties a reasonable royalty methodology must have to the facts of...more

Linda Liu & Partners

Current State and Emerging Challenges of SEP Licensing for Intelligent Connected Vehicles in China (II)

Linda Liu & Partners on

III. Principles and Methods Adopted by Chinese Courts for Calculating SEP Royalties in Lawsuits in the Field of Communications - 1. Regarding Justiciability of SEP License Disputes in China - Interpretation of the Supreme...more

Erise IP

Reasonable Royalty 101: A Prudent Approach to the Most Common Patent Litigation Damages

Erise IP on

Coming out of the COVID shutdown era, patent infringement litigation has been hot. To be sure, there have been big headlines during the past couple of years, among them billion-dollar verdicts against Intel and Cisco in...more

AEON Law

Patent Poetry: No Contract Breach for Failing to Pay Royalties after Patent Expires

AEON Law on

The Tenth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s judgment dismissing an action claiming breach of a patent settlement agreement. The court agreed that the patent owner failed to establish damages for unpaid royalties, given...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - May 2022

Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P. v. U.S. Venture, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2020-1640, -1641 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 29, 2022) - Our case of the week has a little bit for everyone, including lost profits, reasonable royalties,...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Expert Patent Damages Opinions Hit the Spotlight as Federal Circuit Scuttles Two Patent Infringement Verdicts Worth $1.2 Billion...

In two recent decisions, both issued on February 4, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “CAFC”) erased two huge patent damages awards because the underlying expert opinion on damages was...more

Snell & Wilmer

Federal Circuit Rejects Two-Tiered Royalty Patent Damages

Snell & Wilmer on

By Dan Staren and David Barker Last week, a Federal Circuit panel vacated a billion dollar jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) and remanded for a new trial on damages...more

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up - October 2021

Fish & Richardson on

This post summarizes some of the significant developments related to patent litigation in federal district courts of Texas for the month of October 2021....more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Federal Circuit Clarifies that Willful Infringement Does Not Require Egregious Conduct

On September 28, 2021, in a precedential opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in SRI Int’l, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Nos. 2020-1685, -1704, clarified its decision from a prior appeal in the...more

Knobbe Martens

Patentee Failed to Apportion Licenses to Bundled Patents to Establish Royalties

Knobbe Martens on

OMEGA PATENTS, LLC v. CALAMP CORPORATION - Before Prost, Dyk, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Summary: Licensing policies that allow use of any or all of a...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Damage Expert Testimony Excluded for Failure to Disclose Evidence and to Apportion

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision to preclude a damage expert from characterizing license agreements and opining on a reasonable royalty rate where the sponsoring party...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Last Week in the Federal Circuit (August 23-27): Supporting Damages Expert’s Testimony

With Labor Day around the corner and summer coming to a close, the Federal Circuit had a busy week with a lot of precedential opinions to pick from. Below we provide our usual weekly statistics and our case of the week—our...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Bayer v. Baxalta: Federal Circuit Upholds Jury’s 17.78% Royalty Award for Patent Infringement by Adynovate® (Factor VIII,...

The Federal Circuit has affirmed Bayer’s patent infringement victory related to Baxalta’s biologic product, Adynovate.  Bayer Healthcare LLC v. Baxalta Inc., No. 2019-2418, 2021 WL 771700 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2021).  At the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Federal Circuit Confirms That a Patent Damages Expert May Opine on a Range of Royalty Rates at Trial

In a recent decision issued in Bayer Healthcare LLC v. Baxalta Inc., the Federal Circuit held that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it allowed the jury to select from a range of proposed royalty rates...more

Kidon IP

The Patent Litigation Money Pit

Kidon IP on

Patent litigation, the Sport of Kings, does not come cheap, especially when the litigation transmogrifies into a multi-jurisdictional slugfest. When managing a global patent fight, it is important to keep the big picture in...more

JAMS

FRAND License Disputes: Litigation and ADR

JAMS on

A party to a dispute making a conscious decision whether to litigate or arbitrate does not occur as often as some might think. The decision is often made by the circumstances. If a dispute arises regarding a license or other...more

JAMS

Is ADR the Cure for COVID-19-Related Litigation? - The benefits of having a neutral with life sciences experience to resolve your...

JAMS on

As we continue our battle against COVID-19, one of the successes is the speed with which pharmaceutical companies have developed vaccines. For those not familiar with the science and the process of getting new drugs to...more

White & Case LLP

Ongoing Appeals May Shape How Juries and Courts Determine Patent Royalties

White & Case LLP on

A patent holder that prevails in a patent infringement suit is entitled to either lost profits or a reasonable royalty. A reasonable royalty calculation often implicates the infringing product's revenues (the "royalty...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Court Allowed to Defer to State Court on Contract Dispute That Raised Patent Validity Questions

Knobbe Martens on

WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC., v. SASSO - Before Newman, Schall, and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. Summary: A federal court properly exercises its discretion to...more

Harris Beach PLLC

Verdict in T-Cell Immunotherapy IP Case Tests 'Reasonable Royalty' Concept for Large Damage Awards

Harris Beach PLLC on

One of the most interesting and promising areas of medical research today involves the use of T-Cell therapies, which offer hope and promise as a new approach to cancer treatment. It has also made for a robust climate for...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Immunex Corp. v. Sandoz Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2020)

The Federal Circuit held recently that the "all substantive rights" test, used heretofore to determine the identity of the "patentee" for purposes of satisfying 35 U.S.C. § 281, should be the standard for determining common...more

94 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide