News & Analysis as of

Patent Trolls › Patent Litigation › Patent Infringement

Patent Troll is a pejorative term used to describe persons or entities who aggresively assert patent ownership rights and typically do not manufacture or make use of the underlying patented inventions. Often,... more +
Patent Troll is a pejorative term used to describe persons or entities who aggresively assert patent ownership rights and typically do not manufacture or make use of the underlying patented inventions. Often, patent trolls exist solely to aggregate and litigate patents. Many in the technology industry claim that patent trolls stifle innovation and have urged Congress to combat these practices by passing comprehensive patent reform. less -
Williams Mullen

[Webinar] 2024 North Carolina CLE Institute - February 9th, 9:00 am - 2:00 pm ET

Williams Mullen on

Join us for the 2024 North Carolina CLE Institute, Hosted by Williams Mullen, a virtual legal education program designed to provide timely legal guidance and help you to secure your CLE credits....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

NPE Showcase – VirnetX

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

VirnetX is a classic example of an NPE that does not qualify as a “patent troll.” How can you tell? Patent trolls leverage the litigation system to negotiate settlements for less than the cost of defending against a lawsuit....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

NPE Showcase – Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patent trolls”). This installment will focus on a company named Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

NPE Showcase: NPE Litigation in 2023 – What to Expect

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patent trolls”). This installment will focus on NPE litigation as a whole, and what to...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

NPE Showcase – Foothills IP

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patent trolls”). This installment will focus on a company named Foothills IP....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Eighth Circuit Defends Use of Term “Patent Troll,” Vacates Injunction against Infringement Defendant

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated an injunction restraining defendants from engaging in certain allegedly harassing conduct because there was no evidence tying the defendants to the alleged misconduct and...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Delaware Court Denies Motion to Dismiss NPE’s Direct Infringement Claims Despite Sparse Allegations

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The number of Non-Practicing Entities (NPE) cases has increased in Delaware by almost 10% over the last year. If you or a client finds yourself the target of an NPE patent litigation suit, the next question is usually what...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

[Webinar] Don’t Feed the Trolls: How and When to Respond to Patent Demand Letters - January 11th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Womble Bond Dickinson on

A number of small providers are receiving patent demand letters with a settlement or licensing offer to avoid litigation. How should you respond? Should you respond? Many of these letters are a typical part of the playbook of...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

VLSI Technology, LLC v. Intel Corp. (W.D. Texas 2021)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

There is an undercurrent in patent law these days that litigation favors the defendant.  Rather than contending infringement of a few claims of one patent, plaintiffs are now advised to assert multiple claims across several...more

Kidon IP

The Real Empty Suit? Unified Patent’s Reverse Trolling Take 2

Kidon IP on

It seems that Unified Patent’s year plus PR campaign against HEVC assets in the US has run out of steam. While their COO’s incoherent rants about Velos Media may be amusing, as I detailed earlier the campaign was misguided...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Patent Troll Akoloutheo Sues Oracle in Latest Chapter of its Cloud Software and IoT Patent Litigation Campaign

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on

In its latest filing in February 2019, non-practicing entity Akoloutheo, LLC has expanded its Eastern District of Texas patent litigation campaign to include Oracle. Akoloutheo accuses the Oracle Analytics Cloud, Oracle...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Your Card’s Been Declined: Patent Troll Vindolor Continues its Year-Long Point-of-Sale Patent Litigation Campaign against Three...

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on

With three new filings in February 2019 against household names like Macy’s, Best Buy, and Lululemon, Vindolor, LLC—a non-practicing entity—has expanded its contactless “tap-to-pay” point-of-sale patent litigation assault to...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2018)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

When the PTAB Attacks! - In the past few years, the public's perception of the patent system in the United States has been at a low point. One of the causes of this lack of confidence in the system has been the increase...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Cloud Computing Patent Litigation Trends – Competitor Cases, Open Source Targets, Cloud Customers

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on

Since launching Cloud IPQ last year, we have focused on the intersection of cloud computing and intellectual property with a particular emphasis on the increasing number of patent lawsuits filed against cloud computing...more

Robinson & Cole LLP

IP+T: Intelligence Newsletter - December 2017

Robinson & Cole LLP on

If you own trademark registrations in the United States, you are required to make certain filings with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to keep your trademark registration(s) alive. In particular, prior to the sixth...more

Snell & Wilmer

Fighting Patent Trolls

Snell & Wilmer on

When it comes to suppressing U.S. competiveness, no one does it better than patent trolls. A 2017 study concluded that 5,100 patent infringement lawsuits were filed in 2016. Patent Trolls account for about 67% of those. ...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

GEMSA’s Patent Onslaught Against Cloud Computing Customers

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on

Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. (“GEMSA”), a foreign non-practicing entity (“NPE”) organized under the laws of Australia, filed almost 40 patent lawsuits in five batches in 2015 and 2016. The majority of these...more

Smith Anderson

My Company Can be Sued Where?: Supreme Court Resolves Some Questions of Where Businesses May Be Sued for Patent Infringement but...

Smith Anderson on

After a long period in which the U.S. Supreme Court considered intellectual property issues only occasionally, the Court has frequently focused on intellectual property matters in recent years, reflecting the increasing...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

U.S. Supreme Court Upends Nearly 30 Years of Patent Venue Law

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC officially reinstating a more restrictive standard for where patent holders can file patent...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

The Supreme Court Reverses Decades-Old Venue Precedent and Re-affirms Fourco

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Setting up a major shift in patent litigation, the Supreme Court in T.C. Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, today rejected the long-standing Federal Circuit precedent of VE Holding Corp. v. Johnson Gas Appliance...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC (2017)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

On May 22, 2017, in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, the Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit and held that the word "resides" in the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), "refers only to the State...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Preview -- TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Next week, on Monday March 27, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC case. This case involves the interpretation of the current patent venue statute. And while...more

Burr & Forman

Supreme Court to Hear "The Republic of Texas is No More"1 Patent Venue Case; A Potential Blow to Patent Trolls

Burr & Forman on

Many patent holders, including patent trolls, have long preferred the federal courts of the Eastern District of Texas because they have the reputation for being "plaintiff friendly." In 2016, 1668 patent cases were filed in...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Patent Trolls Beware! -- Supreme Court to Review Patent Venue Statute

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In the past few years, the Supreme Court has been single-handedly tackling the so-called Patent Troll problem. Sure, in that time, the President and Congress have made Patent Trolls a focus of their agendas, and have...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

In re: TC Heartland LLC: Status Quo for Venue Selection in Patent Suits (For Now)

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Federal Circuit, in In re: TC Heartland LLC (No. 2016-105), recently issued an opinion denying TC Heartland’s petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware to either...more

68 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide