News & Analysis as of

Pleadings Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Harris Beach PLLC

Extensive Rule Changes to Joint Local Civil Rules in S.D.N.Y. and E.D.N.Y

Harris Beach PLLC on

Effective July 1, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York will impose a series of changes to their joint local rules. These changes mark the culmination “of a multi-year...more

Carr Maloney P.C.

What Did The Plaintiff Know and When Did He Know It? The Availability of Post-Trial Discovery to Pursue Sanctions Under VA. Code...

Carr Maloney P.C. on

I. Introduction - Virginia law provides for monetary and nonmonetary sanctions against litigants and their counsel for signing a pleading that is not well grounded in fact and law or is otherwise brought for an improper...more

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes

Ninth Circuit Applies Lower Standard for Pleading Scienter Under § 14(e) of Securities Exchange Act Even as to Opinions

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled last week that the securities-law requirement to plead a “strong inference” of scienter does not apply to claims under § 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act even where...more

Reveal

FRCP 15: What It Means for Litigants and How to Efficiently Prepare for Trial

Reveal on

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) can be intricate and confusing, especially when it comes to the interplay between various rules. Few aspects of civil litigation present potential pitfalls such as amending and...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Still No Need to Prove an Infringement Case at the Pleading Stage

As the Federal Circuit made clear a few years ago in Nalco Co. v. Chem-Mod, LLC, a plaintiff “need not ‘prove its case at the pleading stage.’” The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not require a plaintiff to plead facts...more

Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP

IP Alert: Federal Circuit Reaffirms Patent Owners Need Not Prove Infringement at the Pleading Stage

On July 13, in Bot M8 LLC v. Sony Corporation of America, the Federal Circuit reaffirmed the pleading standards for patent owners. A complaint does not need to set forth facts proving infringement; instead it is sufficient if...more

Jones Day

Pleading Patent Infringement in the United States: Evolving Standards

Jones Day on

The Situation: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 84, which permitted U.S. patent-infringement lawsuits to proceed on very general allegations, was withdrawn three years ago. Subsequent court decisions have considered how much...more

Holland & Knight LLP

CBCA Issues New Rules of Procedures

Holland & Knight LLP on

On Aug. 17, 2018, the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) published a final rule amending its rules of procedures which will be effective for cases filed with the board on or after Sept. 17, 2018. The CBCA's current...more

Jones Day

Mandatory Pilot Program Expedites Discovery Schedules for the Northern District of Illinois

Jones Day on

Beginning June 1, 2017, the Northern District of Illinois will be participating in a three-year pilot project, known as the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project," which will require the parties in civil cases to respond...more

Brooks Pierce

NC Business Court On Conflicting Rules Of Civil Procedure: Do You Need Leave Of Court To Amend Your Answer To Add A Counterclaim?

Brooks Pierce on

If I asked you if you were familiar with Rule 13(f) of the NC Rules of Civil Procedure, I'm betting that you would respond with a glassy stare and a slack jaw. That Rule deals with a counterclaim that you should have made in...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

The Evolving Standard for Pleading Direct Patent Infringement

Foley & Lardner LLP on

It has been a little more than half a year since the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure abrogated Rule 84 and put an end to the Form 18 bare-bones style patent complaint. The question on the minds of many...more

McAfee & Taft

Changes to Federal Rules to affect patent infringement pleadings

McAfee & Taft on

Patent owners and businesses should be prepared for yet another change to patent infringement litigation. In April 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted Congress’s amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which went...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Begin with the End in Mind: Collaboration with Outside Counsel in Preparing Trial-Ready Initial Pleadings

If there is a secret to effective business litigation, it is planning early and well – as early as preparing the complaint or, for defendants, their answer and defenses. While a cogent, powerful opening pleading has always...more

Fish & Richardson

Pleading Patent Infringement Without Form 18

Fish & Richardson on

On December 1, 2015, changes recommended by the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and adopted by the Supreme Court will take effect. Among these changes is elimination of the...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Form 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rejected as an “Off-Ramp” to Twombly

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Merus B.V. moved for dismissal, arguing the Federal Circuit created an “off-ramp” for patent cases by holding in K-Tech Telecomms., Inc. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., 714 F.3d 1277 (Fed. Cir. 2013), that when the principles set...more

King & Spalding

Third Circuit Adopts Relaxed Pleading Standard for False Claims Act Cases

King & Spalding on

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently rejected the strict approach taken by many federal circuit courts to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) that requires a qui tam relator bringing a False...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide