News & Analysis as of

Pregnancy Wal-Mart

Husch Blackwell LLP

Seventh Circuit Upholds Exclusion of Pregnant Workers from Temporary Alternative Duty Policy

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In a recent decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that an employer did not violate the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) despite excluding pregnant workers from its “Temporary Alternative...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Federal Court Upholds Employer's Ability to Limit Light Duty to Workers' Comp Situations

​​​​​​​In Young v. United Parcel Service, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employer’s light duty program that excludes workers with pregnancy limitations can violate federal pregnancy discrimination laws. However, the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Seventh Circuit Upholds Walmart Pregnancy Accommodation Win Over EEOC

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has rejected the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s appeal seeking to overturn the trial court’s decision that Walmart did not violate the Pregnancy...more

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission...

EEOC Sues Wal-Mart For Pregnancy Discrimination

Menonomie, Wisconsin Distribution Center Refused to Keep Pregnant Workers on the Job Working Light Duty, Federal Agency Charges - MADISON - Wal-Mart violated federal law when it refused to accommodate workers'...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Fenwick Employment Brief - June 2013

Fenwick & West LLP on

In Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, the United States Supreme Court affirmed an arbitral decision allowing the plaintiff to proceed with classwide arbitration even in the absence of express language to that effect in the...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide