News & Analysis as of

Reasonable Accommodation › Hiring & Firing › Young v United Parcel Service

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Double Whammy For Employer Who Won’t Accommodate Pregnancy — But Will The EEOC’s Case Survive?

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit last week in a federal court in Pennsylvania against Landis Communities (retirement communities), claiming that Landis unlawfully refused to accommodate the pregnancy and...more

Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP

RI Employers (Large and Small) Required to Accommodate Healthy Pregnant Workers and New Moms. No, FMLA Leave is Not Enough.

Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP on

Last month, the Rhode Island Fair Employment Practices Act was amended to require employers with 4 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodations to employees and prospective employees with a “condition”. Such...more

Franczek P.C.

A Review of the Supreme Court’s 2014 - 2015 Term

Franczek P.C. on

During the United States Supreme Court’s 2014-2015 term, the Court departed from the pro-business reputation it had developed in labor and employment cases. This term, employees prevailed more often than not, including in...more

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation

PDA and Young: Pregnancy Discrimination Law to Break from Its Infancy

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation on

On the heels of the Hobby Lobby decision in late June, the Supreme Court has signaled that women’s health issues in the workplace will continue to be a central issue by granting a petition for certiorari in Young v. United...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide