News & Analysis as of

Relators Supreme Court of the United States

ArentFox Schiff

Relator Calls on Supreme Court to Define Standard for a ‘Willful’ Kickback under Federal Anti-Kickback Statute

ArentFox Schiff on

On June 7, Adam Hart, a former employee of McKesson Corporation, filed a petition for certiorari to the US Supreme Court asking the Court to define the “willfulness” element of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS). United States...more

Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA)

The compliance lessons in the wake of the Supreme Court decision in U.S. ex rel Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc.

The False Claims Act (FCA) permits private individuals to bring lawsuits in the name of the United States—called qui tam—against those they believe have defrauded the federal government: 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b). The FCA thereby...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Challenge to False Claims Act Qui Tam Provisions Fails in an Initial Attempt to Revive Long-Dormant Arguments as to...

This July, we detailed the Supreme Court’s surprising revival in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Resources, No. 21-1052 (S. Ct. June 16, 2023) of the question of whether the qui tam provisions of the False...more

PilieroMazza PLLC

The FCA at the Supreme Court, Part 4 of 4: Government Intervention and Dismissal of FCA Cases

PilieroMazza PLLC on

The False Claims Act (FCA) saw quite a bit of action at the Supreme Court in its most recent completed term. In this fourth and final installment of PilieroMazza’s blog series “The FCA at the Supreme Court,” we examine active...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

The Haunting in the Cornfield: Relators’ Qui Tam Claim Confirmed Dead by the Eighth Circuit

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed judgment against relators in a case alleging that a group of dairy farmers growing corn violated the False Claims Act by filing false insurance claims paid by the Federal...more

Stevens & Lee

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Clarify Key Provisions of the False Claims and Anti-kickback Statutes

Stevens & Lee on

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the request of qui tam relators that it review the Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in United States of America ex rel. Martin v. Hathaway, No. 22-1463 (6th Cir.). In so doing, the...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

False Claims Act Decisions to Know from Q2 2023

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

In this post, we summarize noteworthy False Claims Act (FCA) decisions from the second quarter of 2023. U.S. Supreme Court Decisions. The second quarter was particularly noteworthy because the Supreme Court decided two...more

McGuireWoods LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies DOJ’s Authority to Dismiss Whistleblowers’ False Claims Act Suits, Questions Constitutionality of Qui...

McGuireWoods LLP on

In United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court recently resolved a circuit split[1] by holding that in a False Claims Act (“FCA”) action (1) the Government may seek dismissal of...more

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief

Recent Supreme Court Case Affirms Government’s Power to Dismiss Qui Tam Suits

On June 16, 2023, the Supreme Court (the “Court”) in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources affirmed the federal government’s power to dismiss a False Claims Act (“FCA”) action brought under the qui tam...more

Stevens & Lee

Supreme Court’s Decision in SuperValu May Benefit Defendants in False Claims Act Cases

Stevens & Lee on

Last month in United States ex rel. Schutte, et al. v. SuperValu Inc. et al, the Supreme Court unanimously held (with Justice Thomas writing the opinion) that the False Claims Act’s (“FCA”) scienter element refers to a...more

Littler

Supreme Court Determines When the U.S. Government May Dismiss an FCA Action Over a Relator’s Objection

Littler on

On June 16, 2023, in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a circuit split in favor of a broad interpretation of the federal government’s ability to dismiss False...more

BCLP

U.S. Supreme Court Explains Meaning of “knowingly” Under the False Claims Act

BCLP on

In its recent unanimous and significant decision in the consolidated cases of United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, No. 21-1326 (6-1-23), and United States ex rel. Proctol v. Safeway, Inc., No. 22-111 (6-1-23), the...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

False Claims Act Update: A Mid-Year Review (2023)

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The Supreme Court issued a number of headline-grabbing decisions this term on topics like religious accommodation, LGBTQ protections, and consideration of race in college admissions. These decisions are wide-reaching and...more

NAVEX

Weighing the Potential Whistleblower Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court Case, Polansky v. Executive Health Resources

NAVEX on

A whistleblower case that began more than a decade ago and has made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately could have significant implications for other whistleblower cases. At the very least, the decision will bring...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

US Supreme Court Upholds Broad, but Not Unfettered, Government Authority to Dismiss FCA Cases

Latham & Watkins LLP on

DOJ may dismiss qui tam False Claims Act cases at any point, as long as it intervenes in the case and satisfies the deferential Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) standard. The US Supreme Court, in its 8-1 June 16,...more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

The Supreme Court Confirms the Government’s Essentially Unfettered Authority to Dismiss False Claims Act Cases

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

On Friday, June 16, 2023, I (sort of) lost my bet that the Supreme Court would follow the path charted in Borzilleri v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, 24 F.4th 32 (1st Cir. 2022) to determine the government’s False Claims...more

Troutman Pepper

Does the Government Retain Control of False Claims Act Cases?

Troutman Pepper on

United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc. (S. Ct. June 16, 2023) - The vast majority of False Claims Act cases are initiated by private parties, known as relators, not the government. In fact,...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

The Supreme Court Confirms The Government’s Significant Discretion To Dismiss False Claims Act Cases

On June 16, 2023, the Supreme Court ruled in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., that (i) under the False Claims Act, the government may move to dismiss a False Claims Act (“FCA”) action...more

Holland & Knight LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rules on False Claims Act Dismissals

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in U.S. ex rel. Polansky that the federal government has the authority to dismiss a False Claims Act (FCA) suit at any stage of litigation, even over a relator's objections, so long as the...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Supreme Court Affirms Government Dismissal Power — Subject to Minor Limits — in FCA Qui Tam Cases

On June 16, 2023, the Supreme Court in United States ex rel. Polanksy v. Executive Health Resources, affirmed the Third Circuit’s deferential standard regarding the government’s ability to dismiss False Claims Act (FCA)...more

Miller Canfield

Supreme Court Ruling Strengthens Government’s Ability to Voluntarily Dismiss Whistleblower Lawsuits

Miller Canfield on

The United States Supreme Court has ruled in an 8-1 decision that the U.S. government has broad authority to dismiss whistleblower actions over the individual whistleblower’s objections so long as the government intervenes...more

King & Spalding

U.S. Supreme Court Allows Justice Department to Dismiss Whistleblower Cases

King & Spalding on

On June 16, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that the DOJ properly secured a dismissal of a whistleblower suit accusing Executive Health Resources Inc. of violating the False Claims Act by improperly billing Medicare....more

ArentFox Schiff

US Supreme Court Rules 8-1 in Favor of Government FCA Dismissal Authority

ArentFox Schiff on

On June 16, 2023, in United States, ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., the US Supreme Court addressed the government’s authority to dismiss a qui tam False Claims Act (FCA) suit over a relator’s objection...more

Jones Day

The U.S. Supreme Court Affirms the Government's Authority to Dismiss FCA Qui Tam Cases After Declining to Intervene

Jones Day on

The False Claims Act's ("FCA") use of qui tam relators (private individuals bringing suit on behalf of the government) has long raised both procedural and substantive challenges....more

Blank Rome LLP

The Once and Future King: SCOTUS Maintains the Government May Intervene in Previously Declined FCA Matters to Seek Dismissal

Blank Rome LLP on

Last Friday, June 16, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) ruled that the federal government may seek to dismiss a qui tam False Claims Act (“FCA”) suit over the relator’s objection, even where it previously declined to...more

107 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide