News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Subpoenas

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Holland & Knight LLP

A Lighthearted Look at "Notable" Quotes from In re Grand Jury Oral Arguments

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Jan. 9, 2023, in the In re Grand Jury case. Despite the nondescript title, the stakes in the case are stratospheric for the future of the attorney-client privilege....more

Winstead PC

SEC Files Subpoena Enforcement Action Against Covington & Burling, Seeking Names of Clients Impacted by Chinese State-Sponsored...

Winstead PC on

On January 10, 2023, the SEC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Covington, a large law firm that was victimized by the so-called Hafnium cyberattack by Chinese state actors. Hafnium reportedly was engaged in...more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

In re Grand Jury: Supreme Court Considers the Scope of Attorney-Client Privilege for “Dual-Purpose Communications”

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

The firm petitioned the Supreme Court for review, asserting a three-way split between the Ninth Circuit (which it described as applying a primary purpose standard), the D.C. Circuit (described as applying its preferred...more

Mintz - Securities Litigation Viewpoints

“We lost. Sorry everyone”: The Implications of a District Court Finding Digital Token, LBC, Is a Security

Mintz - Securities Litigation Viewpoints on

Crypto litigation, fueled by a surge of investors and market volatility, has ballooned in recent years. For example, numerous securities class actions and government subpoenas followed the May 2022 collapse of the $60 billion...more

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,...

U.S. Supreme Court To Address Attorney-Client Privilege In Tax Case

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,... on

Takeaway: The Supreme Court is expected to clarify the question of whether attorney-client privilege applies in “dual-purpose” communications in situations where law firms provide clients with both legal and non-legal advice....more

WilmerHale

Supreme Court to Take Up the Most Consequential Attorney-Client Privilege Case in Four Decades: What it Means for You

WilmerHale on

For the first time since its 1981 opinion in United States v. Upjohn, the United States Supreme Court, in a review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in In re Grand Jury, will examine the scope of the attorney-client privilege...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - October 3, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, on the first day of the new term, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in nine cases: Gonzalez v. Google LLC, No. 21-1333: Section 203(c)(1) of the Communication Decency Act shields an...more

Hinch Newman LLP

The Art of Responding to an FTC CID by an FTC CID Lawyer

Hinch Newman LLP on

A Federal Trade Commission Civil Investigative Demand is an administrative subpoena utilized by the Federal Trade Commission (and other regulatory agencies, such as a state Attorney General) to obtain documentary materials...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

International Arbitration Update: Supreme Court To Resolve Circuit Split Over Discovery In Aid Of Foreign-Seated Private...

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On March 22, 2021, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Servotronics Inc. v. Rolls-Royce PLC, No. 20-794, to determine whether the discretion granted to district courts under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (“Section 1782”)...more

Harris Beach PLLC

Recent Amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) Introduces Meet-and-Confer Obligation in Advance of Corporate...

Harris Beach PLLC on

An amendment to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) that took effect on December 1, 2020 requires attorneys to meet-and-confer regarding the subject matters of an organization’s oral deposition....more

Latham & Watkins LLP

US Supreme Court Decisions in Presidential Subpoena Cases: Implications for Private Parties

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The Court’s recent rulings on state grand jury and congressional subpoenas identify important limitations on the purpose and scope of these investigative tools. Key Points: ..In July 2020, the Court held that the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Trump v. Vance

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On July 9, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Trump v. Vance, No. 19-635, holding that President Donald Trump was required to respond to a state subpoena of his tax returns and other financial information because “Article...more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

COVID-19 Shutdown Showdown in Pennsylvania

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on

Lawmakers and citizens across the country are engaged in disputes over the breadth and duration of shutdown orders intended to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus. Pennsylvania was the first state, however, to have...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - December 16, 2019

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in the following cases: Trump v. Vance, No. 19-635: Whether as part of a district attorney’s criminal investigation targeting the President of...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Cross-Border Investigations Update - September 2019

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

This issue of Skadden’s semiannual Cross-Border Investigations Update takes a close look at recent cases, regulatory activity and other key developments, including a review of the first year of GDPR enforcement, analysis of...more

PilieroMazza PLLC

Weekly Update Newsletter - January 2019 #2

PilieroMazza PLLC on

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING - A Government Executive article discussed the impact of the shutdown on some defense contractors. As the partial government shutdown continues, some American defense firms are receiving...more

Holland & Hart LLP

The CLOUD Act: Where It Sheds Light and Where Shadows Remain

Holland & Hart LLP on

The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act) amends the Stored Communications Act (SCA) and moots the Supreme Court's consideration of a dispute between the U.S. government and Microsoft over whether Microsoft...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Congress Reshapes Legal Requirements for International Access to Communications Information with the CLOUD Act

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

On April 17, 2018, at the request of both sides of United States v. Microsoft Corp., the U.S. Supreme Court remanded and dismissed one of the most closely watched privacy cases of the last several years just a few weeks after...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court Rules Microsoft Case Moot as CLOUD Act Becomes Law

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP on

The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act) was recently signed into law as part of the omnibus appropriations bill. ...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

CLOUD Act dramatically changes international privacy laws (and eDiscovery)!

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Without any public hearings, review, or public comment Congress created the CLOUD Act which was signed into law as part of the $1.3 trillion government spending bill which changed the 1986 Stored Communications Act (SCA). The...more

A&O Shearman

The Supreme Court Dismisses As Moot Microsoft Case That Had Challenged The Government's Ability To Obtain Search Warrant For...

A&O Shearman on

On April 17, 2018, the Supreme Court dismissed United States v. Microsoft, No. 17-12, 548 U.S. ___ (2018) (per curiam), deciding that recently enacted federal legislation had mooted the legal dispute in the case. The appeal...more

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider

Supreme Court Orders Dismissal of Microsoft Case

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider on

As had been expected following the passage of the CLOUD Act by Congress last month, the U.S. Supreme Court remanded and ordered the dismissal of the pending United States v. Microsoft Corporation, Inc. case in a per curiam...more

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider

Government and Microsoft In Agreement that Pending Case Mooted by CLOUD Act

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider on

On March 30, 2018 Solicitor General Noel J. Francisco filed a motion with the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Microsoft Corporation that seeks to vacate the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit...more

White and Williams LLP

United States v. Microsoft Raises Significant Questions Regarding Application of the Stored Communications Act

White and Williams LLP on

On Tuesday, February 27, 2018, the US Supreme Court heard oral argument in connection with an ongoing dispute between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Microsoft over data in the corporation’s datacenter in Ireland. At the...more

A&O Shearman

The Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments In United States v. Microsoft

A&O Shearman on

On February 27, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. Microsoft, No. 17-2. The case presents the question whether a U.S.-based entity (Microsoft) must comply with a judicially-authorized...more

64 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide