News & Analysis as of

State and Local Government Contract Terms Preliminary Injunctions

McDermott Will & Emery

This Week in 340B: April 29 – May 5, 2025

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick...more

Shutts & Bowen LLP

Florida Preliminary Injunctions Must Merely Preserve the Status Quo

Shutts & Bowen LLP on

In a recent case, Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal offered a reminder that the fundamental—and limited—purpose of a preliminary injunction is to maintain the status quo....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

AB 51: Preliminary Injunction GRANTED

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Among other things, AB 51 makes it unlawful for employers to impose arbitration agreements on employees as a condition of employment, even if employees are permitted to opt out. AB 51 was quickly challenged...more

Epstein Becker & Green

California Federal Court Issues Detailed Decision Explaining Its Preliminary Injunction to Block Anti-Arbitration Law

Epstein Becker & Green on

As we wrote here, United States District Court Judge Kimberly J. Mueller of the Eastern District of California wrote a brief “minute order” explaining that she was issuing a preliminary injunction to halt enforcement of...more

Littler

California Court Concludes that Anti-Arbitration Law is Likely Preempted

Littler on

On February 7, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued an order supporting its injunction of Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51), an expansive anti-arbitration law enacted in October, which was...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

AB 51 Challenge: Preliminary Injunction Issued

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: After granting a temporary restraining order days before AB 51 was to go into effect, the Eastern District of California granted a motion for a preliminary injunction on January 31, 2020. An order detailing...more

FordHarrison

A (Temporary) Reprieve for Mandatory Workplace Arbitration

FordHarrison on

On December 30, 2019, a federal judge in the Eastern District of California entered an order temporarily halting the enforcement of AB 51, California’s new anti-mandatory arbitration law. AB 51, which was set to go into...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Not So Fast – Federal Court Issues TRO to Enjoin Enforcement of New California Arbitration Statute

Epstein Becker & Green on

We recently wrote about a new California law set to go into effect on January 1, 2020 that would outlaw mandatory arbitration agreements with employees....more

Littler

Enforcement of California’s Anti-Arbitration Law Put on Hold

Littler on

A federal court in California has prevented, at least for now, an expansive anti-arbitration law from taking effect on January 1, 2020.  Under Assembly Bill (AB) 51, enacted on October 10, 2019, employers cannot require...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Are No-Hire Provisions Now Void and Unenforceable Under Pennsylvania Law?

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On January 11, an en banc panel of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a trial court’s decision declaring that a no-hire provision in a commercial contract between two businesses was void and unenforceable under...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide