Intellectual Property Civil Procedure Science, Computers & Technology

Read Intellectual Property Law updates, alerts, news, and legal analysis from leading lawyers and law firms:
News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court Holds That Belief of a Patent’s Invalidity Is Not a Defense to Inducement of Infringement

On May 26, 2015, in Commil v. Cisco, the Supreme Court held by a 6-2 vote that an accused infringer's belief that a patent is invalid does not serve as a defense to charges of inducing infringement of the patent under §...more

Locke Lord QuickStudy: Filling in Some Actavis Gaps - California Supreme Court Adopts Structured Rule of Reason Test for Antitrust...

A sweeping new opinion from the California Supreme Court revives California Cartwright Act challenges to pay-for-delay pharmaceutical patent settlements. In re Cipro Cases I & II, (Case No. S198616, Slip Op. May 7, 2015). A...more

Pretrial Motions Are Decided Before Trial

Helios Software, LLC, et al. v. Spectorsoft Corporation, C.A. No. 12-81-LPS -MPT, May 22, 2015 Stark, C. J. The court makes various pretrial rulings in advance of a June 15, 2015 jury trial. ...more

Stay Pending IPR Is Denied

Robinson, J. Defendants’ motion for partial stay pending inter partes review is denied. Defendant petitioned for IPR for five of the ten patents-in-suit. The PTAB has instituted review of 4 of the 5 patents-in-suit. The...more

Supreme Court’s Decision in Commil v. Cisco: Big Win for Pharmaceutical Industry

On May 26, 2015, the Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit’s decision in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. and held that a defendant’s belief regarding patent validity is not a defense to an induced infringement...more

News Flash – Oracle v. Google Copyright Case

In its brief filed on May 26, 2015, the US Solicitor General (SG) advised the US Supreme Court to not hear Google’s appeal of a decision, from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that copyright protection...more

U.S. Supreme Court: Belief in Patent's Invalidity Not a Defense to Induced Infringement

In a 6-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a defendant’s good-faith belief in the invalidity of a patent is not a defense to a claim for inducing infringement of the patent.  Under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), “[w]hoever...more

Dismissal For Failure To State A Claim For Joint Infringement Is Recommended

Thynge, C.M. J. . Report and recommendation that defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim of joint infringement be granted. The disputed technology relates to multicasting method and apparatus and...more

Supreme Court Strikes Down New Defense to Inducing Patent Infringement

On May 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (No. 13-896), rejecting the accused patent infringer’s argument that a good faith belief that the patent is invalid is a defense...more

Supreme Court Removes Good Faith Belief of Patent Invalidity as Defense to Induced Patent Infringement

On May 26th, in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held that an accused infringer cannot hide behind a reasonable belief that a patent is invalid in order to avoid being found as an infringer by...more

PTAB Rejects Samsung's Bid to Join Its Own Previously Initiated IPR Proceeding As An Unjustified "Second Bite At The Apple"

In IPR2015-00821, Petitioner Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., sought to join its Petition with a recently initiated IPR proceeding involving the same patent, parties, and counsel. The...more

Supreme Court Rules Belief That Patent Is Invalid Is Not A Defense To Induced Infringement (Commil V. Cisco)

Today, in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an accused infringer’s good faith belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to induced infringement, reversing the Federal Circuit on...more

Does the Supreme Court’s latest move further obviate patent reform efforts?

One of the key components of patent reform has been increased disclosure requirements for patent complaints. Patent infringement defendants have long derided the sparsity of information provided by patent infringement...more

Garcia v. Google Inc. - USCA, Ninth Circuit, May 18, 2015

Ninth Circuit sitting en banc reverses 2-1 panel decision that required Google to remove anti-Islam video from YouTube based on actor’s claim of copyright in her five-second appearance, holding that “a weak copyright claim...more

Supreme Court Holds “Good-Faith Belief in Invalidity” Is No Defense to Induced Infringement

On May 26, 2015, the Supreme Court held in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. that a defendant’s good-faith belief in the invalidity of the patent-in-suit is not a defense to induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b)....more

Good Faith Belief In Patent Invalidity Is No Defense To Claim Of Inducing Infringement

Commil, USA, LLC sued Cisco Systems, Inc. for patent infringement and inducing patent infringement with regard to Commil’s patented method of implementing short-range wireless networks. Today, in Commil, USA, LLC v. Cisco...more

Supreme Court Decision Eliminates Defense to Claim of Inducing Infringement

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday, May 26 that a good-faith belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to a claim of inducing infringement. Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc., No. 13-1986 (May 26, 2015). The Supreme...more

U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Accused Inducer's Good-Faith Belief of Patent Invalidity Is No Defense to Induced Infringement

In a split decision earlier today, the U.S. Supreme Court in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. reversed the Federal Circuit's holding that evidence of an accused inducer's good-faith belief of invalidity may negate the...more

US Supreme Court Eliminates "Good-Faith Belief of Invalidity" Defense for Induced Patent Infringement

On May 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court handed down an important decision regarding induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. §271(b). Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., __ U.S. __ (May 26, 2015). Unlike direct infringement...more

Supreme Court Holds That "Good Faith" Belief in Patent Invalidity is No Defense to Induced Infringement

The U.S. Supreme Court today in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. ruled that a "good faith" belief that a patent is invalid was not a defense to a claim of induced infringement. Reversing the Federal Circuit, the Court...more

Allvoice Developments US, LLC v. Microsoft Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2015)

In August, 2009, Allvoice sued Microsoft in the Western District of Washington, alleging infringement of its U.S. Patent No. 5,799,273. In December, 2013, the District Court granted Microsoft's motion for summary judgment...more

Will Your Cyber Insurance Respond When You Need It Most?

On May 7, Columbia Casualty Company, an insurance company, filed one of the first lawsuits by an insurer seeking to deny coverage for a privacy class action under a cyber insurance policy. Why is this significant? As the...more

Intellectual Property Alert: Akamai v. Limelight: Federal Circuit Limits Direct Infringement of Method Claims

On remand from the Supreme Court, the Federal Circuit held that Limelight did not directly infringe an asserted method claim under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) because the “sweeping notions of common-law tort liability” do not apply to...more

IP Newsflash - May 2015 #4

DISTRICT COURT CASES - Eastern District of Virginia Grants Summary Judgment of Noninfringement to Adobe - On May 7, 2015, Judge Brinkema of the United States district court for the Eastern District of Virginia...more

Patent Safe Harbor Applies to Supplemental New Drug Applications

On May 13, 2015, the Federal Circuit confirmed in Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. that the safe harbor provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1) can shield post-FDA approval activities from liability for...more

2,146 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 86

Follow Intellectual Property Updates on:

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×