News & Analysis as of

Appeals Counterclaims

BCLP

Castelbajac Saga: Can the Misleading Use of a Patronymic Trademark by Its Assignee Be Sanctioned by Its Revocation for Deceptive...

BCLP on

A new development in the Castelbajac case, which pits the designer with the eponymous name against the company PMJC, concerning the application for revocation of the trademarks assigned to the latter by the designer. In a...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Amending a Complaint or Counterclaim for Divorce Remains Freely and Liberally Permitted

Fox Rothschild LLP on

A recently published decision of Saseeshkumar v. Venugopal confirms that a request to amend a Complaint and/or Counterclaim for Divorce can and should be freely permitted in the interests of justice. While the facts here are...more

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg LLP

Maryland Appellate Court Addresses Obligation of Tenant Shut Down By COVID Order To Pay Rent

Nearly four years after the depths of the COVID-19 pandemic, issues concerning the legal consequences of executive and legislative orders shutting down business operations are still working their way through appellate courts...more

Lathrop GPM

Eighth Circuit Rules a Franchisor Is Not Entitled to Compel Arbitration of its Own Claims After Receiving a Series of Unfavorable...

Lathrop GPM on

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the denial of a motion to stay pending arbitration because the claims of the franchisor, Breadeaux’s Pisa, did not fall within the mandatory stay provision of the Federal...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Noncompulsory Counterclaims Don’t Confer Appellate Jurisdiction

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that it does not have appellate jurisdiction to review noncompulsory patent counterclaims in a case otherwise unrelated to the originally asserted patents. Teradata...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Another Smorgasbord Of Opinions From The Court Of Appeals

Fox Rothschild LLP on

On May 3, 2022, the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued a large batch of opinions. By my count, twenty-two were published and thirty were unpublished. While history may prove me wrong, none of the published opinions...more

Roetzel & Andress

Limitations on School District Participation in Tax Valuation Disputes Will Be Law

Roetzel & Andress on

The Governor of Ohio signed amended House Bill 126 into law on April 21, 2022, greatly restricting the ability of Ohio’s public school districts to challenge property tax valuations. Once the law goes into effect on July...more

International Lawyers Network

A David And Goliath Style UGG Boot Dispute

Just over five years after the California-based retail giant Deckers Outdoor Corp. (Deckers) filed a lawsuit against Sydney-based footwear company, Australian Leather Pty Ltd (Australian Leather) for trademark infringement,...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

UGG, Is it Finally Over?

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

A long-running battle between Deckers Outdoor Corp., the makers of UGG boots, and Australian Leather PTY Ltd. may finally be over after a May 7 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The battle...more

Knobbe Martens

Court Grants Relief From Judgment After Witness Lies About the Bed of Its Own Making

Knobbe Martens on

CAP EXPORT, LLC v. ZINUS, INC. Before Dyk, Bryson, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Summary: A judgment and injunction were properly set aside pursuant to...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Is my interest in a deed subject to the Stranger Rule?

McGlinchey Stafford on

The Bullet Point: An Ohio Commercial Law Bulletin Is my interest in a deed subject to the Stranger Rule? October 15, 2020 Compulsory Counterclaims to foreclosure Helfinstine v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 9th Dist. Summit...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Almirall, LLC  (Fed. Cir. 2020)

In Amneal Pharmacueticals LLC v. Almirall, LLC, the Federal Circuit professed to address a question it had not considered before: whether attorney's fees and a exceptional case determination was available for fees and costs...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - May 14, 2020

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group, Inc., No. 18-1086: Petitioner Lucky Brand Dungarees and respondent Marcel Fashions Group have been engaged in three separate rounds of trademark-related litigation over a...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - April 2020

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Myco Industries v. BlephEx, LLC, Appeal No. 2019-2374 (Fed. Cir. April 3, 2020) - This week’s Case of the Week concerns issues relating to free speech in the patent infringement context. In an...more

White & Case LLP

Proving Fraud in the English Courts – a higher standard?

White & Case LLP on

The Court of Appeal has confirmed in Bank St Petersburg PJSC v Vitaly Arkhangelsky that the correct standard of proof where issues of dishonesty arise is not a ‘heightened’ civil standard, but the balance of probabilities....more

Gray Reed

“No Obligation” Clause Dooms Oil and Gas Asset Bid

Gray Reed on

In Chalker Energy Partners III LLC v. LeNorman Operating LLC, the Texas Supreme Court reaffirmed its belief in the sanctity of the written contract and the freedom of parties to negotiate and agree to contracts as they...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

A Stern Rebuke: Bankruptcy Courts have Constitutional Authority to Confirm Plans Containing Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases

On December 19, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit became the first federal circuit court of appeals to hold that a bankruptcy court may confirm a plan containing nonconsensual third-party releases without exceeding...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

A Little Knowledge Is a Dangerous Thing: Beware the Statute of Limitations in Trade Secrets Misappropriation Cases

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Knowledge that a competitor or former employee is misappropriating trade secrets is difficult to come by. At the same time, however, once a company has notice that misappropriation may be occurring, the...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Dividing Misappropriation Claim Among Different Trade Secrets Ineffective to Avoid Statute of Limitations

Holland & Knight LLP on

In most states for certain claims, the statute of limitations is tempered by the "discovery rule," under which the limitations period does not start until the claimant knew or should have known of its claim against the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Counterclaim Plaintiff Estopped from Antitrust Claims in Co-Pending Case

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a counterclaim plaintiff was estopped from relitigating antitrust claims in a separate action where the prior judgment allegedly involved separate and alternative...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Anti-Slapp Statute Does Not Apply To Allegations That Insurer Improperly Refused To Provide Cumis Counsel

Miller Marital Deduction Trust v. Zurich American Insurance Company, — P.3d –, 2019 WL 5304862; First Appellate District Court of Appeal, Division Three, Case No. A155398 (October 21, 2019). In Miller Marital Deduction...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - September 2019 #2

Curver Luxembourg, SARL v. Home Expressions Inc., Appeal No. 2018-2214 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2019) In a significant case in the field of design patents, the Federal Circuit clarified the scope of design patent infringement...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Applies Collateral Estoppel and Avoids Antitrust Issues

Knobbe Martens on

INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP. Before Prost, Bryson, and Reyna. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Summary: The Federal Circuit applied collateral...more

Moore & Van Allen PLLC

U.S. Supreme Court Said “No” to Class Arbitration in Employment-Related Data Breach Dispute Because Arbitration Agreement...

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued two 5-4 decisions in as many months regarding class procedures. Lamp Plus, Inc. v. Varela, 587 U. S. ____ (2019) was favorable to corporate defendants by limiting the availability of class...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - March 2019

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Determines Time-Barred Petitioner Joined to an IPR Has Appellate Standing - In Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Research Corporation Tech., Appeal Nos. 2017-2088, -2089, -2091, the Federal Circuit held that a...more

50 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide