News & Analysis as of

Appeals Prejudice

Miller Canfield

A Lil’ Too Late - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Refuses to Compel Arbitration After Company Litigates Case for 7...

Miller Canfield on

When has a party waived its contractual right to arbitrate? Until recently, most federal Courts of Appeal—including the Sixth Circuit— held that a party who participates in litigation (e.g., by serving and responding to...more

Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson PLLC

The Nuts and Bolts of Appeals: Preservation, Prejudice, and Presentation

People appeal their case because they want a better outcome then what they received at trial. Maybe that means that the appealing party lost a jury verdict, or felt that they didn’t “win” enough at trial. Perhaps someone in...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Bursting the Bubble on Prosecution Delays

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing a case where a patent owner filed hundreds of applications as part of a strategy to maintain extraordinarily lengthy patent coverage, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s...more

Stikeman Elliott LLP

Extending the Time to Opt Out of a Class Action? Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Guidance on Applicable Test

Stikeman Elliott LLP on

In Johnson v. Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal (the “Court”) allowed for the extension of time within which the appellant could opt out of a class action. In doing so, the Court provided welcome appellate guidance on the...more

Smith Gambrell Russell

Unanimous U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Prejudice Requirement for Arbitration Waiver

On May 23, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the question of waiver in a case governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and held that a party can waive its right to arbitration irrespective of whether the other...more

King & Spalding

Morgan v. Sundance: Prejudice Not Required To Waive Arbitration Rights

King & Spalding on

In Morgan v. Sundance, the Supreme Court unanimously concluded this week that waiving arbitration rights does not require a showing that the party seeking to have their case heard in federal court would be prejudiced by...more

Perkins Coie

Federal Circuit Clarifies Prejudice Is Never Presumed in Bid Protests

Perkins Coie on

Last week, in a decision that will increase the burden of proof for contractors in bid protests, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit clarified that prejudice, a critical part of any protest action, is not to be...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Federal Circuit Weighs in on Prejudice in Bid Protests

Ringing out 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in Systems Studies & Simulation, Inc. v. United States, recently held that there generally is no presumption that a protester has suffered competitive...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - June 2021 #2

Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Andrew Hirshfeld, Appeal Nos. 2018-2390, -2391, -2392, 2019-1038, -1039, -1049, -1070 (Fed. Cir. June 1, 2021) - This week’s Case of the Week explores a long-running dispute between controversial...more

Cozen O'Connor

Notice of Appeal - Spring 2021

Cozen O'Connor on

Precedential Opinions of Note - Government Must Prove Falsity Under Any Objectively Reasonable Standard - United States v. Harra (January 12, 2021), No. 19-1105 http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/191105p.pdf Unanimous...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Apportionment Unnecessary When Royalty Is Based on Comparable License

McDermott Will & Emery on

Rejecting a defendant’s request for a new trial on a variety of grounds, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a damages award and explained that apportionment was unnecessary because a sufficiently...more

Smith Anderson

Helpful But Prejudicial Trial Evidence May Come at a Cost

Smith Anderson on

Be careful what you ask for. If that juicy prejudicial evidence seems just too good to pass up, you should consider the Fourth Circuit’s recent decision in 'Macsherry v. Sparrows Point.' Trials are expensive and...more

Downey Brand LLP

Third Appellate District Voids City Council Vote Based on Legislative Member’s Bias

Downey Brand LLP on

On May 8, 2020, the Third Appellate District, certified for publication its earlier decision in Petrovich Development Co. LLC v. City of Sacramento (C087283), where the Court, in a rare decision, voided a city council’s...more

A&O Shearman

Without prejudice communications open to inspection in settlement agreement

A&O Shearman on

The Court of Appeal held that without prejudice material incorporated into a settlement agreement between the claimants and one of the defendants could be inspected by the remaining defendants in on-going multi-party...more

Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP

Standing and Prejudicial Error: The Importance of Demonstrating Multiple “Prejudices” in Bid Protests

We all know that, in real life, prejudice is a bad thing. But in the unique world of bid protests, success can actually depend on establishing prejudice. Two different types of prejudice, believe it or not! Of course,...more

Dickinson Wright

Appealability of Dismissals “Without Prejudice”*

Dickinson Wright on

A fundamental rule of appellate jurisdiction is the need for a “final” decision. In Michigan, a final judgment or order is typically “the first judgment or order that disposes of all the claims and adjudicates the rights and...more

Flaster Greenberg PC

Stairway to Retrial: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Cites Error in Led Zeppelin Infringement Ruling

Flaster Greenberg PC on

In 2016, a California jury decided that Led Zeppelin’s “Stairway to Heaven” did not infringe on Randy Wolfe’s “Taurus”. However, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed that decision and has now called for a do-over,...more

Goodwin

Biosimilar Litigation Updates

Goodwin on

Below is an update on recent developments in several litigations involving biosimilar products. Amgen v. Sandoz (filgrastim, pegfilgrastim): As we previously reported, the district court granted summary judgment of...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Chris Lazarini Provides Insight on "Remmer Hearing" in Juror Influence Allegations

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini provided insight on a case in which a former broker sought to overturn a jury verdict finding him guilty of securities fraud, obstruction of justice and wire fraud by arguing, among...more

Knobbe Martens

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Taranto, Clevenger, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Proceeding to trial despite a party’s violation of a discovery order...more

Fisher Phillips

Glimmers of Hope? Pair of Recent PAGA Cases Provide Rare Procedural Victories for California Employers

Fisher Phillips on

If you’re a California employer, perhaps no single law strikes fear into your heart quite as much as the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA). PAGA allows individual “aggrieved employees” to bring...more

Holland & Knight LLP

D.C. Circuit Rules That the 8(a) Program is Constitutional, But Its Reasoning Raises Questions

Holland & Knight LLP on

On September 9, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) issued a split decision holding that § 8(a) of the Small Business Act does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the...more

Dechert LLP

General Motors: Protection Granted in Section 363 Sale Orders is Only as Good as the Notice Given

Dechert LLP on

In a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the General Motors case, the court held certain claimants were not afforded procedural due process with respect to the § 363 sale of General Motor...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Appellate Court Notes

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

Appellate Court Advance Release Opinions: Released after 11:30 a.m. AC37222 - State v. Leon - AC36118 - Taft v. Commissioner of Correction - AC35815 - State v. Devito - AC36483 - Brochu v. Aesys...more

Burr & Forman

Burr Commentary: Florida’s 5th DCA Holds Prejudice Necessary to Show Defense Under Paragraph 22, Splits With Own Panels in Haberl...

Burr & Forman on

In Gorel v. Bank of New York Mellon, 5D13-3272 (Fla. 5th DCA May 8, 2015) Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal offered relief to increasingly popular arguments using minor defects in paragraph 22 notices of default as a...more

27 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide