News & Analysis as of

Health Care Providers Implied Certification

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

White Collar Year in Preview: False Claims Act Trends in 2020

Editors’ Note: This is the fourth in our start-of-year series examining important trends in white collar law and investigations in the coming year. Our previous entry discussed anti-corruption trends in 2020. Up next: a look...more

PilieroMazza PLLC

Ex Rel. Radio - Prevention Is Priceless: FCA Protection in the Healthcare Industry

PilieroMazza PLLC on

“Prevention Is Priceless: FCA Protection in the Healthcare Industry” is the fourth episode of "Ex Rel. Radio," our multi-part series on the False Claims Act. In this episode, PilieroMazza Counsel Michelle Litteken joins our...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Third Time’s Not the Charm: Supreme Court Again Declines to Weigh in on Escobar’s “Materiality” Standard

The Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari last Monday in U.S. ex rel. Prather v. Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc., No. 17-5826 (6th Cir. June 11, 2018), again declining to revisit or clarify the False Claims...more

The Volkov Law Group

The Supreme Court’s Escobar Decision and the Impact on False Claims Act Cases (Part I of IV)

The Volkov Law Group on

This week I am running a series of posts on healthcare fraud enforcement and the False Claims Act. With all the controversy swirling around the Mueller investigation and prosecutions, the Justice Department continues its...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

What Have We Learned About False Claims Act Litigation in the Two Years Since Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex...

Summer is almost here. For some, that means planning vacations to the beach, hitting the gym to shed that winter weight, or perhaps hitting the golf course—but for us at the Sheppard Mullin Healthcare Law Blog and the False...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Escobar’s Demanding Materiality Standard Nixes $350 Million Verdict Against Florida Nursing Facility

A Florida federal court threw out a $350 million jury verdict against a nursing facility, citing the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar. The court explained...more

Jones Day

Judge Cites Escobar Materiality Standard, Vacates $350 Million False Claims Act Judgment

Jones Day on

The Situation: The False Claims Act imposes civil liability on any person or entity that "knowingly presents, or causes to be presented" to the U.S. government "a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval." The...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Applying Escobar’s Materiality Standard, Florida Federal Court Reverses $350 Million False Claims Act Verdict against a Nursing...

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

If the government does not take action and continues to pay for Medicare/Medicaid claims after it learns of non-compliance related to the claims, is the non-compliance material to the government’s decision to pay? This is a...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

Florida Federal Court: Escobar Requires Reversal of $348 Million False Claims Act Jury Verdict

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida vacated a large jury verdict in a False Claims Act case against the owners and operators of nursing homes because the evidence did not satisfy the...more

Alston & Bird

Implied False Certification Liability Under the False Claims Act: How the Materiality Standard Offers Protection after Escobar

Alston & Bird on

The False Claims Act (FCA), initially enacted in 1863 during the Civil War, was sponsored by the Lincoln administration to curtail the rampant fraud and excessive profiteering being perpetuated by government contractors, who,...more

Jones Day

False Claims Act's "Rigorous" Materiality Standard Enforced by Second Circuit

Jones Day on

The Situation: A decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reinforces the growing body of case law regarding the strict materiality requirements of the False Claims Act. The Result: Coyne v. Amgen is...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Escobar: Year One

Universal Health Services, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar, 136 S. Ct. 1989 (2016) was a landmark case in FCA jurisprudence. In Escobar, the Supreme Court held that the implied false certification theory can be a basis for...more

Saul Ewing LLP

Implied Certification Theory Loses Some of Its Fangs, but Is Another False Claims Act Theory Lurking Just Around the Corner?

Saul Ewing LLP on

Federal courts across the country are wrestling with the uncertainty caused by the Supreme Court’s holding in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar regarding the requirements to state an implied...more

Troutman Pepper

Lessons From a Year of Escobar

Troutman Pepper on

It has been one year since the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar, which resolved a circuit split as to the validity of the implied false certification theory...more

Saul Ewing LLP

After Escobar, Lower Courts Build On The “Materiality” Analysis for False Claims Act Lawsuits

Saul Ewing LLP on

It’s been just over a year since the Supreme Court’s seminal False Claims Act (“FCA”) decision Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar. In the wake of Escobar, the lower courts are confronted with...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

FCA Deeper Dive: Escobar and Its Aftermath – Part I

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

The FCA continues to be the federal government’s primary civil enforcement tool for investigating allegations that healthcare providers or government contractors defrauded the federal government. In the coming weeks, we are...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Escobar's Impact: Recent Application of "Materiality" in Ninth Circuit

Last year, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decided Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar (Escobar), 136 S.Ct. 1989 (2016), creating important implications for Federal False Claims Act (FCA) cases...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

“Implied Certification” Theory Allowed Under the False Claims Act

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The Supreme Court recently allowed liability through the implied certification theory of the False Claims Act (FCA), which was raised and upheld in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar. The...more

WilmerHale

Materiality Under FCA: The Lower Courts Grapple With Escobar’s Meaning

WilmerHale on

The Supreme Court’s decision in Universal Health Services v. Escobar ex rel. United States sought to clarify the standard for materiality under the False Claims Act, but lower courts have already begun to adopt different...more

McGuireWoods LLP

First Circuit Finds that the Allegations in Escobar Satisfy the Supreme Court’s Materiality Requirements

McGuireWoods LLP on

The United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Escobar, which we have discussed previously, upheld the use of the implied certification theory where the implied certification of statutory/regulatory compliance is...more

Burr & Forman

2016 Health Care Year in Review

Burr & Forman on

Since I began writing this year-end review in 2013, there have been some common themes – a shift to pay for quality and away from fee-for service, much of which has been brought about by the Affordable Care Act (ACA): efforts...more

Fish & Richardson

False Claims Act: Recent First Circuit Opinion on Remand in U.S. ex rel. Escobar v. United Health Services

Fish & Richardson on

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court’s important opinion in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar, 136 S. Ct. 1989 (2016), dealt with the issue of whether a so-called “implied certification” that a...more

Burr & Forman

The Materiality Standard In False Claims Actions

Burr & Forman on

The Supreme Court decided Universal Health Services v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar on June 16, 2016 in which it ruled the implied false certification theory, previously recognized in several circuits, can form the basis for False...more

Troutman Pepper

US Supreme Court False Claims Act Decision in Escobar Has Significant Implications for Contractors

Troutman Pepper on

On June 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the matter of Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, 136 S. Ct. 1989 (2016), changing the legal landscape for False Claims Act qui tam claims...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Implied Certification Using a Fact-Intensive Materiality Standard

The legal landscape for False Claim Act (“FCA”) cases recently shifted when the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel Escobar, No. 15-7, 2016 WL 3317565 (U.S....more

37 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide