News & Analysis as of

LG Electronics

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Error in Prior Art Did Not Render Invention Obvious

In LG Electronics Inc. v. Immervision, Inc., the Federal Circuit held that an obvious error in a prior art reference was not considered a teaching. The court explained that a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) would...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Case - July 2022 #2

LG Electronics Inc. v. Immervision, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2021-2037, -2038 (Fed. Cir. 2022) In this week’s Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit considered how to treat a prior art reference in which the alleged teaching of...more

Knobbe Martens

Unforced Error: An IPR Challenger Cannot Rely on an Error That a Posita Would Have Corrected

Knobbe Martens on

LG ELECTRONICS INC. v. IMMERVISION INC. Before Stoll, Cunningham, and Newman, Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Where a reference contains an “obvious”...more

Jones Day

Fintiv Revisited—District Court Transfer Results in Institution Reversal

Jones Day on

In November 2020, Google LLC filed two petitions requesting an inter partes review of the claims of Ikorongo Technology LLC (“Ikorongo”) owned U.S. Patent No. 8,874,554 (“the ’554 patent”)....more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

LG Chem Secures a Second Look at Jurisdictional Issues in NJ Vape Battery Suit

The New Jersey Appellate Division has held that Korean company LG Chem Ltd. (“LG Chem”)will have another opportunity to dispute New Jersey’s jurisdiction over it in a product liability lawsuit concerning a vaping device...more

Knobbe Martens

Don’t Be Late - Interlocutory Appeals of Liability Issues Shouldn’t Wait for Resolution of Damages Issues

Knobbe Martens on

MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD. v. LG ELECTRONICS INC. Before Dyk, Prost, and Hughes.  Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Summary:  An order resolving all liability issues starts the clock for...more

Knobbe Martens

Characterizing Plaintiff’s Actions as Attempts to “Manipulate Venue,” Federal Circuit Orders Transfer of Cases to More Convenient...

Knobbe Martens on

IN RE: SAMSUNG ELECS., CO., LTD. Before Lourie, Dyk, and Reyna.  On Petitions for Writs of Mandamus to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Summary:  Manipulation of venue through...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Seeing a Forest, Not Just Trees: Core Wireless v. LG

Fenwick & West LLP on

Do you remember obviousness before KSR v. Teleflex? To invalidate, the rule went, one must find an express rationale for combining references (a teaching, suggestion or motivation). ...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2018)

As patent-eligibility stands in 2018, it can be difficult to determine whether a graphical user interface (GUI) with an innovative layout and/or functionality meets the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 101. On one hand, a GUI is...more

Robinson & Cole LLP

Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider - November 2017

Robinson & Cole LLP on

US-CERT Warns of New Ransomware: Bad Rabbit - The U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) is warning companies in the U.S. about a new ransomware dubbed “Bad Rabbit.” US-CERT stated it has received multiple...more

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider

Privacy Tip #112 – LG Releases IoT Software Update

Security researchers at Check Point discovered software vulnerabilities in LG IoT devices which allowed them to potentially gain control over LG refrigerators, ovens, dishwashers and a live feed from a robot vacuum cleaner. A...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

2016 PTAB Year in Review

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati is pleased to present our 2016 PTAB Year in Review. We begin with a look at 2016 activity at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), which again ranked as the busiest jurisdiction in the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Judge Gilstrap Awards Enhanced Damages in LG/Core Wireless Dispute

On November 1, 2016, The Honorable Rodney Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas added $456,000 in enhanced damages after a jury found that LG willfully infringed two patents owned by...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2016)

Core Wireless Licensing brought an action against LG Electronics in the Eastern District of Texas. Core contended that LG infringed claim 21 of its U.S. Patent No. 7,804,850. LG moved for summary judgment on the grounds...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Data Transmission Patent Not Invalid Under Alice

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Since the decision of Alice v. CLS Bank, courts have routinely invalidated patents for being directed to nothing more than abstract ideas with no inventive concept. However, there is light at the end of the tunnel for patent...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

IP Newsflash - February 2016

FEDERAL CIRCUIT CASES - Federal Circuit Strikes Down Award of Attorneys’ Fees - In a decision that rejects a recent trend of district courts’ willingness to award attorneys’ fees since the Supreme Court’s 2014...more

Troutman Pepper

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Adds Two More Cases to its List of Precedential and Informative Decisions

Troutman Pepper on

Earlier this month, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) added two decisions to its list of “precedential” opinions for the USPTO’s new proceedings for challenging patents under the America Invents Act. The list (which...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

PTAB Designates Decision Concerning One-Year Statutory Bars As Precedential

Last week, the PTAB designated two recent post-grant proceeding decisions as “precedential,” marking only the second and third time it has designated one of its opinions as binding on all PTAB judges. One of those...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Defendants Summary Judgment Motion in In re Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litigation May Illuminate Policy Justifications Behind...

Earlier this month, defendants in the In re Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litigation moved to challenge the standing of major retailers to pursue damages claims under the Supreme Court’s 1977 Illinois Brick decision. LG...more

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP

PTAB Designates Two America Invents Act Review Decisions as Precedential

Recently, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated two America Invents Act (AIA) review decisions as precedential: LG Electronics, Inc. v. Mondis Technology, Ltd. and Westlake Services, LLC v. Credit Acceptance...more

Fish & Richardson

PTAB Designates Decision in LG Electronics v. Mondis Tech IPR as Precedential

Fish & Richardson on

As a follow-up to our Alert yesterday, the Board also designated their decision in LG Electronics, Inc. v. Mondis Tech Ltd., IPR2015-00937, Paper 8 (PTAB September 17, 2015) as precedential, a decision explaining the one-year...more

Morris James LLP

Court Recommends Dismissing One Defendant For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction

Morris James LLP on

The accused products are internal and external ODDs. The court finds that the Korean defendant’s accused products are sold with the intent to serve the United States, and thus Delaware’s, markets. Under a dual jurisdiction...more

Carlton Fields

Second Circuit Affirms District Court Decision To Compel Arbitration In Patent Infringement Battle Between LG And WI-LAN

Carlton Fields on

A Second Circuit 3-judge panel affirmed a district court decision denying a request for declaratory and injunctive relief while subsequently compelling arbitration in a licensing infringement suit. On appeal, LG Electronics,...more

Perkins Coie

Inter Partes Review Proceedings: A Third Anniversary Report

Perkins Coie on

When inter partes review (IPR) proceedings became effective in September 2012, few people would have predicted the transformative effect it would have on patents and the litigation landscape. Three years in, IPR has become...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Printed Publication in IPR - LG Electronics, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Addressing the requirements for proof of prior art in inter partes review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) found that the petitioner failed to establish that certain documents cited qualified as...more

27 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide