News & Analysis as of

Manufacturers Medical Devices Preemption

Harris Beach PLLC

New York Medical and Life Sciences: Year in Review 2021

Harris Beach PLLC on

From pharmaceuticals to dietary supplements, preemption to public health, New York state and federal courts issued decisions in 2021, which further shaped the landscape in the medical and life sciences legal world. To prepare...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Product Liability 2021 Year in Review

Massachusetts federal and state courts issued several important product liability decisions in 2021. Nutter’s Product Liability practice group reviewed these cases and report on their significant holdings as follows...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Medical Manufacturer Prevails in Massachusetts Product Liability Suit

Holland & Knight LLP on

When someone is deciding whether to undergo a medical procedure, they think about a lot of things: How much does the procedure cost? What are the risks? What are the benefits? They probably don't consider whether their...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Code Red: The FDA’s Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Action Plan Poses Potential Risks for Medical Device Makers

Q: The FDA’s stance on a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) software as a medical device is continuously evolving. Could you explain the history? A: Artificial intelligence (AI) is...more

Butler Snow LLP

No Way Around It: The Need for Federal "Permission and Assistance" Can Preempt a State Tort Duty

Butler Snow LLP on

In the simplest case for federal preemption, federal law prohibits conduct that a state tort duty would require, such as a change in the design of an approved medical device to cure an alleged defect. Because federal law is...more

Butler Snow LLP

Express Preemption of Consumer Protection Actions: Preventing a Patchwork of State Drug and Device Regulations

Butler Snow LLP on

The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution declares federal law to be the “supreme Law of the Land.” Thus, when federal law and state law conflict, the state law is “preempted,” or rendered without effect. Under...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Limits Failure to Warn Claims Against Medical Device Manufacturers

Snell & Wilmer on

On December 18, 2018, the Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion clarifying manufacturers’ duty to warn consumers under Arizona common law. The Court held that the federal Medical Device Amendments (“MDA”) impliedly...more

Esquire Deposition Solutions, LLC

Hybrid Medical Devices Cases: Key Takeaways

The future of medical devices and the current uses of hybrid medical devices effects the way lawyers defend clients in product liability cases. As the future of medical devices continues to develop, lawyers must devise...more

Troutman Pepper

Future Expansion of Sunshine Act Reporting to Cover Additional Prescribers

Troutman Pepper on

On October 24, President Trump signed into law the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act (SUPPORT Act)....more

Butler Snow LLP

Pro Te: Solutio Vol. 11 No. 1 – A Reflection on the First Ten Years

Butler Snow LLP on

It’s hard to believe a decade has passed since we delivered our first edition of Pro Te: Solutio to your door. Those years have brought enormous changes in the world and in our industry. Innovation has driven everything we...more

Cozen O'Connor

Third Circuit Issues Precedential Ruling on Express Preemption for Hybrid Medical Devices

Cozen O'Connor on

The Third Circuit has become the first U.S. Court of Appeals to address the application of the express preemption provision in the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 to hybrid medical devices. Hybrid medical devices are...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Product Liability Update: October 2017

Foley Hoag LLP on

Massachusetts Federal Court In Multi-District Litigation Holds Under Six States’ Laws That Manufacturer Of Brand-Name Pharmaceutical Is Not Liable For Injuries Caused By Generic Equivalents Whose Manufacturers Were Required...more

Cozen O'Connor

Lack of Specificity May Kill Parallel State Law Product Claims, But Not Fraud Claim

Cozen O'Connor on

A Michigan district court judge determined last week that product liability claims against an FDA approved medical device manufacturer were preempted by federal law, but allowed the plaintiff’s claim of fraud against the...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

Plaintiff’s Claim that Manufacturer Improperly Trained Physician in use of Class III Medical Device Preempted by Federal Law

In Ashley Glennen v. Allergan, Inc., 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 347, published April 29, 2016, the California Court of Appeal, First District, affirmed the trial court’s sustaining of a demurrer in a Lap-Band injury case on the...more

McAfee & Taft

Tenth Circuit affirms federal preemption of state law tort claims for medical devices

McAfee & Taft on

In Caplinger v. Medtronic, __ F.3d __ (10th Cir. 2015), the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of a patient’s state law tort claims against a medical device manufacturer as preempted by federal law. The Tenth...more

Baker Donelson

Federal District Court Rules Favorably for Medical Device Manufacturer in Off-Label Promotion Lawsuits

Baker Donelson on

On April 13, 2015, in the case of Kathleen Hafer v. Medtronic, Inc., the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee issued a favorable opinion to a medical device manufacturer in the context of...more

Saul Ewing LLP

Ninth Circuit limits Medical Device Amendment preemption of post-PMA tort claims

Saul Ewing LLP on

Medical Device Companies should be aware of a recent en banc ruling by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that has the potential to increase litigation involving class III medical devices....more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Stengel Tangles MDA Preemption: Ninth Circuit Decision Creates Split on Buckman Preemption of Post-Market Reporting Requirements

Last week the Ninth Circuit created a new state-law cause of action against medical device manufacturers: “failure to warn the FDA.” The en banc opinion in Stengel v. Medtronic Inc., __ F.3d __, 2013 WL 106144, 13 C.D.O.S....more

Epstein Becker & Green

Massachusetts Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Manufacturer Conduct: Final Amendments to Be Issued

Epstein Becker & Green on

On November 21, 2012, the Massachusetts Public Health Council approved final amendments to 105 Mass. Code Regs. 970.000, the Massachusetts Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Manufacturer Conduct Law ("Massachusetts Marketing...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide