News & Analysis as of

Prescription Drugs Pharmaceutical Industry Supreme Court of the United States

McDermott+

M+ Check-Up: September 6, 2024

McDermott+ on

Congress Returns. The House and Senate will be back in session on September 9, 2024, with a joint focus on completing consideration of a continuing resolution (CR) to maintain government funding beyond the end of fiscal year...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Loper Bright and the 340B Statute

McDermott Will & Emery on

In its Loper Bright decision last week, the Supreme Court of the United States likely opened opportunities for further legal challenges to the Health Resources and Services Administration’s (HRSA’s) interpretation and...more

Jenner & Block

Client Alert: Access to Mifepristone Still Standing for Now, but Questions Remain

Jenner & Block on

On Thursday morning, the Supreme Court issued its decision in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. Justice Kavanaugh wrote for a unanimous Court dismissing the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine from the case for lack of...more

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to FDA Regulation of Abortion Medication

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP on

In a unanimous decision today, the Supreme Court rejected efforts to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone, overturning an earlier decision by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court ruled that the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Cancer Drugs: Strategies For Patenting Antibody-Drug Conjugate Inventions

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) is a promising class of cancer treatments with accelerating U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and rapidly growing market size as discussed in previous articles in this series. This...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Oral Arguments in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine: Mifepristone Case Likely to Turn on Article III Standing Requirements

Foley Hoag LLP on

Nearly two years after the Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022, additional challenges are being brought that may limit access to abortion in the U.S. Mifepristone was originally approved in 2000 by the U.S. Food and...more

Foley Hoag LLP - State AG Insights

State Attorneys General Weigh in Amidst Supreme Court Case That Could Restrict Access to Abortion Drug Mifepristone

Attorneys general across the country have joined in litigation related to mifepristone, a drug used for medication abortions. A case currently before the Supreme Court, FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, could affect...more

Epstein Becker & Green

State Regulation of Pharmacy Benefit Managers: Tenth Circuit Holds That ERISA and Medicare Part D Preempt Key Parts of Oklahoma...

Epstein Becker & Green on

On August 15, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (the “Tenth Circuit”) issued its decision in Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA) v. Mulready, one of the first major opinions to further define...more

Epstein Becker & Green

SuperValu’s Effect on the FCA Scienter Standard and Impact to Future Litigation

Epstein Becker & Green on

n June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously settled a long-standing dispute over a subjective versus objective standard for scienter under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s own subjective belief is...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

5th Circuit Rejects FDA Actions Expanding Access to Medication Abortion; Supreme Court Review Likely

On Wednesday, August 16, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling upholding parts of a Texas district court’s decision that would, if it becomes effective, severely limit access to mifepristone, one of two pills...more

Dickinson Wright

False Claims Act “Knowledge” Is a Subjective Standard

Dickinson Wright on

The Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) allows private parties to bring lawsuits in the name of the federal government against defendants who allegedly “knowingly” present a false claim to the government for payment. The...more

Burr & Forman

Do I Believe You? Scienter Standard in a FCA Case

Burr & Forman on

Two False Claims Act (“FCA”) cases have recently been decided by the United State Supreme Court, further clarifying one aspect of the FCA. In the recent decisions in U.S. ex rel Proctor v. Safeway, Inc. and U.S. ex rel....more

Locke Lord LLP

Grappling With Increased Insurance ‎Regulatory Scrutiny of Pharmacy Benefit Managers

Locke Lord LLP on

Insurance regulators and examiners (“Insurance Regulators”) are increasing their efforts to scrutinize pharmacy benefit managers (“PBMs”), including conducting examinations of their business operations and initiating...more

Troutman Pepper

All Is Not Lost: The Hidden Defense Benefits of the Supreme Court’s Recent Unanimous Ruling on False Claims Act Scienter

Troutman Pepper on

On June 1, the U.S. Supreme Court published a unanimous decision in a False Claims Act (FCA) case, United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc., No. 21-1326. The opinion, authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, was notable...more

Polsinelli

SCOTUS Rejects Defense-Friendly Scienter Standard In Schutte Opinion

Polsinelli on

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its much-anticipated opinion in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. and United States ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc. (Schutte), holding...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

SuperValu: Supreme Court Clarifies FCA’s State-of-Mind Requirement

On June 1, 2023, in U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc., the Supreme Court clarified the state-of-mind (or “scienter”) standard under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s subjective belief that a claim...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Access to Abortion Pill on the Precipice: A Deep Dive into the Federal Court Rulings that will Decide the Fate of Mifepristone 

For a brief moment in time last April, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) approval of the commonly-used abortion medication, Mifepristone, was curtailed. Just days after a Texas federal judge’s ruling suspended...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

The Supreme Court’s SuperValu Decision on the “Knowingly” Element in the False Claims Act: Protecting Against Liability When There...

In a resounding unanimous 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court rejected the argument that a defendant’s subjective belief is irrelevant under the False Claims Act (FCA) when evaluating whether a defendant “knowingly” submitted a...more

McDermott Will & Emery

SuperValu: It’s Not Super Bad! A Practical Look at the Supreme Court’s Recent FCA Scienter Ruling

McDermott Will & Emery on

Two separate lawsuits alleging False Claims Act (FCA) violations by retail drug pharmacies made their way to the Supreme Court of the United States this term. The lawsuits decided whether the pharmacies could defeat these...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies False Claims Act Scienter Element in Schutte

On June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in the consolidated cases United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. and United States ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc., Nos. 21-1326 &...more

K&L Gates LLP

Supreme Court Issues Decision Regarding False Claims Act's Scienter Element

K&L Gates LLP on

The United States Supreme Court recently held that a defendant’s subjective belief is always relevant to the False Claims Act’s scienter element, regardless of what an objectively reasonable person may have believed. This...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

U.S. Supreme Court Closes Door on Objective Reasonableness Defense in Healthcare False Claims Act Cases

Leaves Window Open for Defense Based on Subjective Belief - On June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in a consolidated appeal of two healthcare qui tam cases that removes a very powerful defense from...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies False Claims Act Scienter Requirement

On June 1, 2023, in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the scienter requirement of a claim brought under the False Claims Act (FCA) is evaluated based on the...more

Baker Donelson

Supreme Court Holds That FCA Requires Subjective Intent

Baker Donelson on

Is subjective intent relevant to FCA claims? The Court answered yes, holding that FCA liability turns on what the defendant actually believed, not on what an objectively reasonable person may have believed. On June 1, 2023,...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

SCOTUS Rejects Objective Knowledge Standard in False Claims Act; Defendant’s Subjective Belief Is Key to Scienter

In a unanimous opinion issued on June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States clarified the relevant standard for scienter — or knowledge — in False Claims Act (“FCA”) actions by ruling that an objectively reasonable...more

119 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide