News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Admissible Evidence

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 14, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Kemp v. United States, No. 21-5726: This case concerns whether the word “mistake” in Rule 60(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applies to a judge’s error of law. Rule 60 authorizes a district court to reopen a...more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

The U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Bronx DA’s Attempted End-Run Around Confrontation Clause

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

In Hemphill v. New York, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the defendant “did not forfeit his confrontation right merely by making [a] plea allocution arguably relevant to his theory of defense.” The Court rejected the attempt...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - January 20, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Hemphill v. New York, Nos. 20-637: In this case, Darrell Hemphill successfully challenged his conviction for the murder of a 2-year-old child killed by a stray bullet in 2006, arguing that the State's presentation of the...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - April 2021

Knobbe Martens on

Copying From a Copyrighted Computer Program May Be Fair Use to the Extent Needed to Promote Adoption of the Use of Accrued Talents in Creating a New Software Platform - In Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., Appeal No....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - April 19, 2021

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Hemphill v. New York, No. 20-637: Whether, or under what circumstances, a criminal defendant who opens the door to responsive evidence also forfeits his right to exclude evidence otherwise barred by the Confrontation Clause....more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: June 2019

Payne & Fears on

This month's key California employment law cases involve EEOC charges, disability discrimination, and meal breaks....more

Knobbe Martens

Will Courts Consider Evidence of Patent Eligibility?

Knobbe Martens on

Patent enforcement by Texas-based DataTreasury Corp. (“DataTreasury”) was a key motivation for the creation of Covered Business Method Review (“CBM”) proceedings. Senator Charles Schumer of New York, referring to...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 2016 #5

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in five cases today: RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community, No. 15-138: The European Union and 26 of its members filed an action in District Court against...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Recent Supreme Court Decision Will Likely Impact Damages in Large, Complex Actions

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

On March 22, 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo, 136 S. Ct. 1036 (2016), addressing the question of when statistical sampling evidence may be used to establish class-wide liability. ...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Stops Short of Bright-Line Rule Regarding Statistical Evidence in Class Actions

Goodwin on

On March 22, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo. For those unfamiliar with the case, Tyson Foods is a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case that involved an alleged failure to pay...more

Moore & Van Allen PLLC

SCOTUS OKs Statistics to Establish Class Action Liability with Limits, Leaves Open Uninjured Class Member Question

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on

Plaintiffs can count the first class action decision to be issued by the U.S. Supreme Court since the death of Justice Scalia as a win; although, they did not receive broad authorization to proceed carte blanche, as some had...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Use of Representative Statistical Evidence to Establish Class-wide Liability in Tyson Foods Overtime...

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court recently affirmed a $2.9 million judgment in a class action for unpaid overtime wages against Tyson Foods Inc. (Tyson) in which employee class members relied on...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Defying Expectations, Supreme Court’s Tyson Decision Avoids “Broad and Categorical Rules” on Use of Statistical Evidence in Class...

McGuireWoods LLP on

Expectations were high in the class action world for the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo. At first blush, however, Tyson seems to be neither the test case nor the blockbuster decision that...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

"Supreme Court Permits Use of Statistical 'Representational Evidence': Implications for the FCA"

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

On March 22, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) class action Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo. In an opinion authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the majority held that class...more

Morgan Lewis

Supreme Court Affirms Limited Use of Representative Evidence in Don-Doff Class

Morgan Lewis on

In 6-2 decision, the US Supreme Court rejected a challenge to a jury verdict in Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo but declined to impose a broad rule for use of representative evidence. On March 22, the US Supreme Court affirmed...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Supreme Court Upholds Class Action in Donning-Doffing Dispute Based on “Representative” Statistical Evidence

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tyson Foods v. Bouahapeko affirms the use, in some circumstances, of “representative” statistical evidence that produced average times for donning and doffing personal protective gear,...more

Locke Lord LLP

Tyson Foods Supreme Court case: What Human Resources and Labor & Employment Practitioners Need to Know

Locke Lord LLP on

Last week’s Quick Study observed that the U.S. Supreme Court in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, 2016 WL 1092414 (Mar. 22, 2016) decided the class-certification issues on fairly narrow grounds. Specifically, “representative...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

U.S. Supreme Court’s Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo Opinion Reaffirms The Importance Of Challenging Plaintiff’s Experts In Class...

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On March 22, 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, et al., No. 14-1146, a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) and a collective action under...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Supreme Court Affirms Class Certification and Judgment Predicated upon "Representative Evidence"

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

On March 22, 2016, the Supreme Court issued a decision permitting class plaintiffs to rely on "representative" or "sample" evidence to satisfy the prerequisites to class certification and certain elements of their claims. ...more

K&L Gates LLP

The Supreme Court Charts a Narrow Course in the Use of Statistical Evidence at Class Certification

K&L Gates LLP on

The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, No. 14-1146, --- S. Ct. ---, 2016 WL 1092414 (U.S. Mar. 22, 2016), as to when a plaintiff may use statistical sampling in seeking to certify a...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Lessons from the Supreme Court: Do Not Settle for Average, Keep Exceptional Time Records

Foley & Lardner LLP on

As we have reported several times before, much litigation has been directed at exposing and litigating the uncertainties posed by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in the area of donning (i.e., putting on) and doffing...more

Carlton Fields

The Aftermath of Tyson Foods: Lessons for Employers

Carlton Fields on

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) class action against Tyson Foods is an important reminder that employers must be aware that certain pre- or post-employment activities are compensable...more

Dickinson Wright

SCOTUS: Statistical or Representative Evidence Can Be Used In Class and Collective Actions

Dickinson Wright on

Class and collective action plaintiffs can establish liability through statistical or “representative” evidence, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, released last week. The decision could have...more

Perkins Coie

Implications of Supreme Court’s Approval of Statistical Study Use in Wage-and-Hour Class Actions

Perkins Coie on

The Supreme Court issued its decision in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo on March 22, 2016. The Court held that a group of employees in a class action could use a statistical study to establish the employer’s liability for...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Supreme Court Says Averages May be Used to Establish Classwide Liability

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on

In its 2011 Dukes decision, the U.S. Supreme Court limited the circumstances under which groups of employees can maintain class action claims relating to their employment. In that case, the Court concluded that Wal-Mart...more

40 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide