News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Mental Health

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
McDermott Will & Emery

Anticipating the MHPAEA Final Regulations: A Word About Network Composition

McDermott Will & Emery on

If our trade and industry sources have it right, we could see final regulations implementing the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA), as most recently amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

More on Guns: Superior Court Upholds Restrictions

Fox Rothschild LLP on

We promised not to turn this into a gun blog but in a country where half of all families own guns and the half that do own a lot of them, the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

In Counterman v. Colorado, the Supreme Court Confirms the Vitality of New York Times v. Sullivan

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on

The future appears bright (or at least brighter) for the Supreme Court's seminal decision New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), after six Justices endorsed its core principles in a recent decision involving the...more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

The Academic Advisor - Education Law Insights, Issue 6, June 2023

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on

Supreme Court Blocks Use of Race in Harvard, UNC Admissions in Blow to Diversity Efforts - "In one of its most closely watched cases this year, the court ruled along ideological lines that the way the schools approached race...more

Fisher Phillips

Top Workplace Law Stories You May Have Missed from April 2023

Fisher Phillips on

It’s hard to keep up with all the recent changes to labor and employment law. While the law always seems to evolve at a rapid pace, there have been an unprecedented number of changes for the past few years — and this past...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

The FemTech Revolution

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

This blog is the first in our Digital Health Trends series. Digital health’s explosion in the last few years has led to the proliferation of new technologies and novel solutions to long-standing health problems. FemTech,...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Employer Provided Travel Benefits in Response to Dobbs and State Prohibitions on Abortion

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

The implications of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that overturned Roe v. Wade’s constitutional right to abortion have had sweeping implications that affect...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Medical Travel Reimbursement Benefits Under the Supreme Court’s New Dobbs Decision

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its highly anticipated decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392. The Dobbs decision expressly overrules the two key precedents that...more

BCLP

Roe Overturned! Meeting Employee Healthcare Needs Post-Roe

BCLP on

The constitutional right to abortion has been eliminated. The Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, undoing a federal standard that had legalized abortions since 1973. ...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Holland & Knight Health Dose: June 22, 2022

Holland & Knight LLP on

Holland & Knight Health Dose is an in-depth weekly dose of legislative and regulatory insights to keep stakeholders abreast of happenings in Washington, D.C., impacting the health sector. This week's topics include ...more

King & Spalding

Ninth Circuit Reverses Decision Against United in ERISA Mental Health Class Actions

King & Spalding on

On March 22, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the judgment of a district court that had ordered United Behavioral Health (UBH) to reprocess over 50,000 mental health and substance use disorder...more

Clark Hill PLC

Window on Washington – Vol. 6, Issue 6

Clark Hill PLC on

The Senate is in session this week, and the House has a committee work period. The Senate plans to vote on nominee confirmations, on U.S. Postal Service reform legislation, and on the House-passed continuing resolution (CR)...more

Cozen O'Connor

The State AG Report - Volume 7, Issue 21 | May 2021

Cozen O'Connor on

Frontier Sued over Allegations that Its DSL Service Is Slower than Advertised  - The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), and a bipartisan group of five state AGs and two California district attorneys, sued Internet service...more

Hogan Lovells

Coronavirus: The Hill and the Headlines, November 2020 # 6

Hogan Lovells on

In Washington: The Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday released drafts of all 12 annual spending bills for 2021, setting up negotiations for a deal ahead of the Dec. 11 deadline to keep the government-funded. Bogged...more

Alston & Bird

Implied False Certification Liability Under the False Claims Act: How the Materiality Standard Offers Protection after Escobar

Alston & Bird on

The False Claims Act (FCA), initially enacted in 1863 during the Civil War, was sponsored by the Lincoln administration to curtail the rampant fraud and excessive profiteering being perpetuated by government contractors, who,...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

“Implied Certification” Theory Allowed Under the False Claims Act

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The Supreme Court recently allowed liability through the implied certification theory of the False Claims Act (FCA), which was raised and upheld in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar. The...more

Burr & Forman

The Materiality Standard In False Claims Actions

Burr & Forman on

The Supreme Court decided Universal Health Services v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar on June 16, 2016 in which it ruled the implied false certification theory, previously recognized in several circuits, can form the basis for False...more

Troutman Pepper

Materiality Is the New Condition of Payment: The Implied False Certification Theory After Escobar

Troutman Pepper on

The Supreme Court has made it clear that, even at the pleadings stage, relators (or the government) must plead facts to support materiality with plausibility and particularity. For False Claims Act (FCA) defendants who...more

McAfee & Taft

Supreme Court ruling potentially expands false claims liability for healthcare providers

McAfee & Taft on

In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled recently that the implied false certification theory may form the basis for liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), resolving a split of among the federal...more

Polsinelli

Supreme Court Rejects Government's FCA Implied Certification Theory

Polsinelli on

The Supreme Court of the United States in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Escobar et al., weighed in on and embraced the implied certification theory of liability within the False Claims Act (FCA)....more

Littler

Supreme Court Endorses FCA Implied False Certification Theory of Liability with Limitations

Littler on

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated False Claims Act (“FCA”) opinion in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar. The June 16, 2016, Court decision resolves a...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court Preserves But Significantly Changes “Implied Certification” Theory of False Claims Act Liability

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On June 16, 2016, the Supreme Court issued its opinion (“Op.”) in Universal Health Services v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar (“Escobar”), a case testing the viability and scope of the implied certification theory of False Claims Act...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

"In Escobar, Supreme Court Upholds False Claims Act’s Implied Certification Theory"

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

On June 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar unanimously upheld the implied certification theory of False Claims Act (FCA) liability. The Court ruled that a party can...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

The Supreme Court Adopts Broad Scope of False Claims Act Liability

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints on

A unanimous Supreme Court issued its long-awaited and closely watched decision today on the scope of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), and the Court affirmed the FCA’s long reach. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States...more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court Opines on Implied Certification Theory in Escobar

Morgan Lewis on

The Court’s rejection of the condition of payment analysis and adoption of a rigorous materiality standard represents a significant shift in how courts must analyze FCA cases premised on underlying regulatory or contractual...more

29 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide