News & Analysis as of September 19, 2024

Title VII › Hiring & Firing › Vance v. Ball State University

+ Follow

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is a United States federal law enacted in 1964 and aimed at preventing discrimination in the workplace on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, and religion. Title VII... more +

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is a United States federal law enacted in 1964 and aimed at preventing discrimination in the workplace on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, and religion. Title VII has been subsequently extended to discrimination on the basis of pregnancy and sexual stereotypes and to prohibit sexual harassment. Title VII applies to all employers with fifteen or more employees including private employers, state and local governments, and educational institutions. less -

Two Supreme Court Rulings Improve Employer's Ability to Defend Against Harassment, Retaliation Claims

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC on 7/26/2013

On June 24, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down two critical decisions regarding Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which improve an employer’s ability to defend against employee claims of harassment and retaliation. ...more

Supreme Court Ruling Defines "Supervisor" and Gives Clarity, Peace of Mind to Employers

Baker Donelson on 7/16/2013

Last month the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a bright-line standard for determining which employees qualify as supervisors in harassment lawsuits filed under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, thus resolving a split in the...more

California Employment Law Notes - July 2013

Proskauer Rose LLP on 7/12/2013

Employee Must Prove That Illegal Retaliation Was The "But For" Cause Of Adverse Job Action Under Title VII - University of Tex. S.W. Med. Ctr. v. Nassar, 570 U.S. ___, 2013 WL 3155234 (2013) - The United States...more

Supreme Court Defines “Supervisor” For Title VII

Sherman & Howard L.L.C. on 7/10/2013

The Supreme Court staked out a definition for "supervisor" in the context of Title VII. Vance v. Ball State Univ., No. 11-556 (June 24, 2013). Whether a person is a "supervisor" determines whether the employer can be held...more

Recent Supreme Court Cases Raise Bar for Plaintiffs Under Title VII

Foley Hoag LLP on 7/5/2013

Two cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court at the end of its 2012-13 term, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar and Vance v. Ball State University, will significantly alter the landscape of employment...more

Employment Law -- Jul 03, 2013

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on 7/5/2013

Excerpt from Supreme Court Sides With Employers in Title VII Suits - Capping off a term of big decisions with employer-friendly results, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed in on two major employment issues in a pair of...more

SCOTUS Adopts a Workable Definition of “Supervisor” Under Title VII

Winstead PC on 6/28/2013

In Vance v. Ball State University, a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Alito and delivered on June 24, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, for the purpose of determining an employer’s liability under Title VII of the Civil...more

U.S. Supreme Court Adopts a Narrow Definition of a Supervisor in Harassment Claims

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation on 6/27/2013

Resolving a split among the circuits, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a “supervisor” for Title VII harassment liability is limited to those who have the power to take a tangible employment action against the alleged victim...more

Who's the Boss? In Vance, Supreme Court Defines "Supervisor" for Purposes of Title VII Harassment Claims

Holland & Knight LLP on 6/27/2013

Since two landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 1998, the courts have applied different rules to sexual and other discriminatory harassment claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") based on...more

Employers Prevail In Two U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

Pierce Atwood LLP on 6/27/2013

The U.S. Supreme Court issued two closely watched decisions Monday affecting Title VII cases....more

The Supreme Court Clarifies Who Is a Supervisor Under Title VII

Littler on 6/27/2013

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court decided what the definition of a "supervisor" is for purposes of assessing liability for unlawful harassment under Title VII. The Court ruled that an employer will be vicariously...more

Supreme Court Issues Important Affirmative Action And Employment Law Decisions

Proskauer - Government Contractor Compliance... on 6/27/2013

This week the Supreme Court issued three decisions that may significantly impact federal contractors and other employers: In Fisher v. University of Texas, No. 11-345 (U.S. June 24, 2013), the Supreme Court held that a...more

Supreme Court Issues Two Important Title VII Opinions

Morgan Lewis on 6/26/2013

Divided Court holds that a "supervisor" must be empowered to take tangible employment actions for vicarious liability under Title VII to apply and that Title VII retaliation claims are subject to a higher "but-for" causation...more

Supreme Court Adopts an Employer-Friendly Definition of "Supervisor" for the Faragher/Ellerth Analysis

Proskauer Rose LLP on 6/26/2013

On June 24, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Vance v. Ball State University, No. 11-556, 570 U.S. ___ (2013), holding that an employee is a "supervisor" for purposes of vicarious employer liability...more

Supreme Court Issues Two Title VII Decisions Favorable For Employers

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC on 6/26/2013

At our recent Labor and Employment Law Seminar, we highlighted a number of outstanding legal cases that have the potential to have a significant impact on employer liability. ...more

Doubling Down: Supreme Court Issues Two Key Rulings Regarding Civil Rights Act Of 1964

Polsinelli on 6/26/2013

On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two important opinions for employers facing liability and retaliation claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII")....more

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects EEOC’s “Nebulous” Definition of “Supervisor” under Title VII

Miller Canfield on 6/25/2013

Employers “may be vicariously liable for an employee’s unlawful harassment only where the employer has empowered that employee to take tangible employment actions against the victim…,” the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 25,...more

Supreme Court Issues Two Employer-Friendly Title VII Decisions

Ballard Spahr LLP on 6/25/2013

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday issued two Title VII decisions favorable to employers. One case examined the definition of a supervisor under the anti-discrimination laws, and the other dealt with an employee’s burden of...more

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Two Key Title VII Rulings

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on 6/25/2013

On June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two highly-anticipated decisions. In Vance v. Ball State University, the justices considered whether the “supervisor” liability rule established by Supreme Court...more

Supreme Court Confirms The Definition Of "Supervisor" Under Title VII

Fisher Phillips on 6/25/2013

On June 24, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, for purposes of employer liability for harassment under Title VII, a supervisor is defined as someone who can undertake or effectively recommend tangible employment...more

20 Results

/

View per page

Page: of 1