News & Analysis as of

Wage and Hour › Rest and Meal Break › Brinker

Payne & Fears

No "End Run" Around Brinker Under Section 17200

Payne & Fears on

The California Court of Appeal has affirmed a complete victory by Safeway Inc. over a certified class of wage-and-hour plaintiffs. Esparza v. Safeway Inc., et al., B287927 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC369766, June 10,...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

The $90 Million Question: Can You Rest While On Call?

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Does carrying a pager nullify a rest break? What about the possibility of being tapped on the shoulder by your boss? Or being called on your cell phone? The California Supreme Court considered these and...more

Fisher Phillips

New Court Decision Lends Further Guidance To Meal And Rest Period Scheduling

Fisher Phillips on

California employers continue to struggle with how to comply with their obligation to provide meal and rest periods to their non-exempt employees. Although the California Supreme Court’s groundbreaking Brinker decision from...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Got Class? Wage and Hour Class Actions in a Post-Brinker World

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP on

In 2012, employers awaited the California Supreme Court’s decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court with the bated-breath anticipation of a presidential election, or an Olympic luge race. And, boy, was it worth...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide