News & Analysis as of

Wage and Hour Rest and Meal Break Wage Orders

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

California Supreme Court Rules on 'Hours Worked'

The California Supreme Court answered a trio of questions from the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals about “hours worked” under Wage Order No. 16, which governs the construction, drilling, logging and mining industries....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Good Faith Defense Applies To Wage Statement Penalty Claims

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The California Supreme Court concluded that the “good faith” defense applies to claims seeking to impose penalties under California Labor Code section 226. An employee must show that an employer’s failure to comply with...more

Littler

California Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of “Hours Worked” Under California Law

Littler on

On March 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued a highly anticipated decision in Huerta v. CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. The Court responded to the request from the Ninth Circuit to answer three questions about Wage...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

California Appellate Panel Defines ‘Willful’ Wage Nonpayment and ‘Good Faith Dispute’

A California appellate panel has weighed in on premium pay in a decision on remand from the state’s highest court, with an employer-friendly result....more

Allen Matkins

California Supreme Court Clarifies Formula for Calculating Payment of Meal, Rest, and Recovery Break Premiums

Allen Matkins on

On July 15, 2021, the California Supreme Court issued a decision that has an impact on all California employers and the manner in which meal, rest, and recovery break premiums are calculated. Labor Code Section 226.7(c)...more

Stokes Wagner

California Supreme Court Holds that “Regular Rate of Compensation” Is Synonymous with “Regular Rate of Pay” for Purposes of...

Stokes Wagner on

On July 15, 2021, The Supreme Court of California published its opinion on Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC and reversed the appellate court’s decision. Under California law, employers must provide employees with...more

Holland & Knight LLP

California Employers Must Immediately Revisit Wage Premium Payment Practices Under New Ruling

Holland & Knight LLP on

The California Supreme Court on July 15, 2021, finally and conclusively resolved a long-unsettled question of California wage and hour law, likely to the detriment of most California employers. In Ferra v. Loews Hollywood...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Missed Meal Period Penalty Must Include Adjustment for Nondiscretionary Payments

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

In a unanimous opinion in Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, the California Supreme Court ruled on the important practical question of whether the “regular rate of compensation” for calculating meal or rest break premium...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

California Supreme Court’s Decision on Premium Payments for Meal, Rest, and Recovery Break Violations

On July 15, 2021, the California Supreme Court issued a decision that will increase dramatically California employers’ potential liability for missed meal, rest, and recovery breaks. In Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC,...more

Payne & Fears

California Supreme Court Holds That Meal And Rest Period Premiums Must Be Paid At The “Regular Rate Of Pay”

Payne & Fears on

Reversing a court of appeal decision that had been welcome news for employers, the California Supreme Court held today in Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC, S259172, that the term “regular rate of compensation,” used for...more

Payne & Fears

California Supreme Court Rejects Use of Rounding Policies for Meal Periods

Payne & Fears on

Today, the California Supreme Court held that employers cannot use the practice of rounding time punches in the meal period context, and that unrounded time records that show noncompliant meal periods raise a rebuttable...more

Fisher Phillips

California Courts Continue To Address “Suitable Seating” Battles

Fisher Phillips on

The standards for “suitable seating” cases in California were set by the California Supreme Court’s landmark 2016 decision of Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Ever since this decision was handed down, employers and employee...more

Littler

Littler Lightbulb: What’s New in Colorado?

Littler on

Colorado has been making headlines with several noteworthy new laws and regulations. This Lightbulb will highlight key recently enacted and pending employment legislation in the Centennial State....more

Fisher Phillips

Recent Meal Period Cases Require Employers To Review Their Current Practices

Fisher Phillips on

The year 2019 brought a number of adjustments in the legal landscape for California employers – and meal periods were no exception. California appellate courts buckled down on the interpretation of statutory language in two...more

Fisher Phillips

Drastic Revisions To Colorado’s Wage And Hour Laws Are Coming

Fisher Phillips on

The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment just published proposed regulations that will dramatically overhaul the state’s wage and hour laws. This sweeping reform has the potential to impact every employer doing...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

DLSE Says: Under Wage Order 5, On Duty Meal Periods Must Be At Least 30 Minutes In Length

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

By way of background, in Palacio v. Jan & Gail’s Care Homes, Inc. (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 1133, the Fifth District Court of Appeal considered the interplay between subdivisions 11(A) and 11(E) of Wage Order No. 5....more

Payne & Fears

Even On-Duty Meal Periods Must Last at Least 30 Minutes

Payne & Fears on

While the California Labor Code specifies that an off-duty meal period must consist of at least 30 minutes of uninterrupted time during which the employee is relieved of all duties, the duration requirement for an on-duty...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

New York High Court Upholds State Labor Department Interpretation Of ‘Live-In’ Home Health Employee Rule

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The New York Department of Labor’s (NYDOL) longstanding interpretation of its wage order as applied to the work hours of non-residential employees performing 24-hour (so-called “sleep-in” or “live-in”) shifts has been upheld...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: December 2018

Payne & Fears on

This month’s key employment law cases address meal periods and payment of wages....more

Fisher Phillips

What Happens If Landmark Appellate Court Decision Is Reviewed By State Supreme Court?

Fisher Phillips on

Following a line of recent federal and state court cases, California employers are required to compensate employees receiving commissions and piece rates separately for non-productive time and rest periods. In a recent...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

California Supreme Court Confirms that Health Care Employees Who Work More Than 12 Hours May Lawfully Waive Second Meal Period

California’s Industrial Welfare Commission ("IWC") Wage Order 5 and the California Labor Code set forth meal and rest period requirements for non-exempt health care employees, and permit the waiver of a second meal period for...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

New Developments On Meal Waivers For Healthcare Workers – Back Where We Started

Fox Rothschild LLP on

California employers know to expect that the law sometimes takes some crazy turns. But the changes to the rules for healthcare worker meal waivers have been particularly insane. Try to keep up....more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

California Supreme Court Confirms Validity Of Meal Period Waivers For Healthcare Employees

On December 10, 2018, the California Supreme Court handed down its unanimous decision in Gerard, et al. v. Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, affirming the Court of Appeal ruling that voluntary meal period waivers are...more

Fisher Phillips

California Supreme Court Provides A Dose Of Helpful Medicine For Healthcare Employers

Fisher Phillips on

In an important decision for employers in the healthcare industry, the California Supreme Court just approved the Industrial Welfare Commission’s long-standing exemption for health care workers in relation to second meal...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: October 2018

Payne & Fears on

This month’s key employment law cases address the test for independent contractor status, the legality of an incentive compensation system, and personal liability for wage and hour violations....more

41 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide