Latest Posts › Patent Infringement

Share:

Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi Live Coverage

On Monday, March 27, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. EDT, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, No. 21-757. William H. Milliken, a director in Sterne Kessler’s Trial & Appellate Practice...more

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2022 Decisions: Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.,...

Nippon Shinyaku and Sarepta entered into a Mutual Confidentiality Agreement to facilitate discussions about a potential business relationship related to muscular dystrophy therapies. Section 6.1 of the MCA contained a mutual...more

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2022 Decisions

As part of the recovery from the global COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit took steps to return to normal operations. It began requiring live oral arguments in August 2022 and, by November,...more

2/8/2023  /  § 314(d) , § 315(b) , 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(1) , Abuse of Discretion , Administrative Patent Judges , Administrative Procedure Act , America Invents Act , Anticipation , Apple , Appointments Clause , Arbitrary and Capricious , Arthrex Inc v Smith & Nephew Inc , Article III , Artificial Intelligence , Broadcom , Burden of Persuasion , Burden of Production , Confidentiality Agreements , Consent Order , Constitutional Challenges , Covenant Not to Sue , Director of the USPTO , Doctrine of Equivalents , Estoppel , Evidence , Ex Partes Reexamination , Expert Testimony , Failure To Disclose , Federal Vacancies Reform Act , Final Written Decisions , Forum Selection , Google , Indefiniteness , Intel , Intellectual Property Litigation , Intellectual Property Protection , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , International Trade Commission (ITC) , Inventions , Inventors , Joint Inventors , Jurisdiction , Lack of Jurisdiction , Likelihood of Confusion , Motion to Amend , Motion to Terminate , Obviousness , Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP) , Parallel Proceedings , Patent Act , Patent Applications , Patent Infringement , Patent Invalidity , Patent Litigation , Patent Prosecution , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patent-Eligible Subject Matter , Patents , Post-Grant Review , Preliminary Injunctions , Preponderance of the Evidence , Prior Art , Qualcomm , Real Party in Interest , Remand , Section 101 , Section 112 , Separation of Powers , Standing , Statutory Authority , Sua Sponte , Substantial Evidence , Testimony , Time-Barred Claims , Trademark Application , Trademark Infringement , Trademark Litigation , Trademark Registration , Trademark Trial and Appeal Board , Trademarks , USPTO , Vacated , Written Descriptions

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2021 Decisions: Kannuu Pty Ltd. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. Ltd., 15...

Kannuu Pty Ltd. and Samsung Elecs. Co. Ltd. entered into a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) as part of business discussions concerning Kannuu’s remote control search-and-navigation technology. The NDA contained a...more

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2021 Decisions

[co-author: Jamie Dohopolski] Last year, the continued global COVID-19 pandemic forced American courts to largely continue the procedures set in place in 2020. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was no...more

2/9/2022  /  § 314(d) , 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(1) , Absolute Intervening Rights Doctrine , Abuse of Discretion , Administrative Patent Judges , Administrative Procedure Act , America Invents Act , Appeals , Appointments Clause , Arbitrary and Capricious , Article of Manufacture , Assignor Estoppel , Burden of Proof , Claim Construction , Collateral Estoppel , Commercial Success , Confidential Information , Constitutional Challenges , Demand Letter , Denial of Institution , Design Patent , Director of the USPTO , Dismissals , Doctrine of Prosecution Disclaimer , Due Process , Equitable Estoppel , Estoppel , Evidence , Ex Partes Reexamination , Executive Branch , Executive Powers , Federal Rules of Evidence , Final Written Decisions , Forum Selection , FRCP 52(c) , GATT , Inferior Officers , Intellectual Property Litigation , Intellectual Property Protection , Inter Partes Reexamination , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , International Trade Commission (ITC) , Intervening Acts , Inventions , Issue Preclusion , Judicial Review , Lack of Authority , Lack of Jurisdiction , Likelihood of Success , Minerva Surgical Inc. v Hologic Inc. , Motion for Summary Judgment , Motivation to Combine , Nexus , Non-Disclosure Agreement , Nonobvious , Obviousness , Ornamental Design , Parallel Proceedings , Patent Applications , Patent Filings , Patent Infringement , Patent Litigation , Patent Prosecution , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patent Validity , Patents , Petition for Writ of Certiorari , Pharmaceutical Patents , Post-Grant Review , Pre-GATT , Preliminary Injunctions , Principle Officers , Printed Publications , Prior Art , Real Party in Interest , Remand , Reversal , Rule 36 , Scope of Review , SCOTUS , Section 325(d) , Sua Sponte , Substantial Evidence , Totality of Evidence , United States v Arthrex Inc , USPTO , Vacated , Writ of Mandamus

PTAB Strategies and Insights Newsletter - June 2021

[co-authors: Patrick Murray, Risa Rahman, and Jae Bandeh] The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return...more

What You Should Know About the Supreme Court's Decision in Minerva

Yesterday, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., concerning the fate of the patent-law doctrine of assignor estoppel—i.e., estoppel against a patent owner who assigns his rights...more

PTAB Strategies and Insights - March 2021

The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more

Supreme Court Holds That PTAB Time-Bar Rulings Are Non-Appealable

In Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP the Supreme Court held, 7-2, that patent owners cannot appeal determinations by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) declining to apply the time-bar of 35 U.S.C. § 315(b)....more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide