Evidence Matters with Bui & Davis: The Dangers of DIY Forensics Collections
Handling State and Federal Subpoenas in Business
AI, Privilege, and the Cognitive Miser: Rethinking Legal Ethics in the Age of Generative AI
Vinson & Elkins Attorneys Discuss Venue Selection for Energy Disputes
IMS Elevate | Why Federal Rule 107 Matters for Your Trial Presentations
Perms, Pay Equity, and the Power of Experts — Hiring to Firing Podcast
The Legal Canvas
Exploring Legal Trends in Social Media Liability
Podcast - Candor Saves Credibility in Courtrooms
One Year After Horn: How Lower Courts Are Applying RICO's Expanded Damages — RICO Report Podcast
Podcast - There's More Than One Way to Win
Podcast - Reflections in the Courtroom: State v. Faulkner
Podcast - Not a Level Playing Field
Mediation Matters: Where Preparation Meets Resolution
Negotiation Tips for Business Owners
From Early Case Assessment to Early Case Intelligence
The Role of an Expert Witness
Podcast - Victories and "Losses" in the Courtroom
Introducing LighthouseIQ: Where Intelligence Meets Performance
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I am counsel in a case involving a web of corporate parties on each side. I now have information that our judge’s adult children own a substantial interest in a two of the parties. I do not know whether...more
If you were hurt in an accident in New Jersey and the other party is claiming that you might share some of the blame, your ability to recover compensation is not necessarily lost. New Jersey follows a modified comparative...more
In a 5-2 decision issued today, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that the placement of the phrase “goods or services ” immediately following a list of specific medical services provided in Section 306(f.1)(3)(iii) of...more
Over the past three decades, anti-SLAPP statutes have become a familiar part of the litigator’s toolkit. When a lawsuit targets speech or petitioning activity, many lawyers instinctively reach for statutory anti-SLAPP...more
In 2024, the Supreme Court upended decades of California precedent when it held that legislatively enacted development impact fees must satisfy the “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” tests established in Nollan v....more
A corporate representative deposition under Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure does something no individual deposition can: it compels an organization to speak. Corporate representatives testify not about...more
Most legal technology shifts do not announce themselves with trumpets. They slip into ordinary practice first. Email was once informal chatter, then became the core of discovery. Predictive coding was once treated as radical,...more
The Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit, represented by the U.S. Solicitor General, recently filed its Respondents’ Brief in Opposition to Judge Pauline Newman’s Petition for Certiorari. While the brief followed its...more
At the beginning of June, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (representing Judge Paulene Newman) filed the Judge’s Reply Brief to the Federal Circuit Judicial Council’s Opposition to her Petition for Certiorari*. The brief...more
The Supreme Court issued an Order this morning denying certiorari in Newman v. Moore. The Court’s Order states that...more
Since the beginning of 2026, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) has issued a slew of opinion letters. In this space, we often comment and provide guidance on those letters. With that said, it is important to remember...more
Hi TCPAWorld! I am Olga Koroleva, one of the newest associate attorneys at Troutman Amin, LLP! And this is my first TCPAWorld post! In Zelma v. Wonder Group Inc., No. 25cv3232 (D.N.J. May 20, 2026), pro se Plaintiff Richard...more
A decade ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Universal Health Services Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar. It was the most consequential False Claims Act decision in years and changed the way lower courts evaluated FCA claims. ...more
Allen Matkins announced yesterday that its trial team — led by lead trial attorney Matthew Sessions, Stacey Villagomez, and Andrew Wood — secured a jury trial victory for Patrick Byrne against Ameris Bank, winning...more
We all should know the risks of rushing to file a trade secret misappropriation claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) without gathering enough facts. In addition to risking Rule 11 sanctions, for example, a...more
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) recently upheld a $1.4 million jury verdict in Robinson v. Marshfield in favor of a fire chief who alleged retaliation after complaining that his niece, a probationary...more
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced a significant procedural shift for False Claims Act (FCA) investigations involving alleged fraud against federally funded, state-administered benefits programs....more
The 2026 ICC Rules of Arbitration (“2026 ICC Rules”) came into force on 1 June 2026 and apply to ICC cases filed from that date. The substantial revisions to the ICC framework encapsulated in the 2026 ICC Rules aim to enhance...more
This article is the first in a two-part “Law Meets Science” series on how the state of the scientific record can affect the reliability of expert evidence. This installment examines the litigation significance of unpublished...more
In Tyson International Co. v. Partner Reinsurance Europe SE, Tyson International Company Limited filed a petition to vacate an arbitration award entered in its favor, and Partner Reinsurance Europe SE cross-moved to confirm...more
In Bornoff v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co., No. B339796, 2026 WL 1194424 (Cal. Ct. App. May 1, 2026), the California Court of Appeal, Second District, reversed summary adjudication of a policyholder’s bad faith claim, holding...more
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) is changing how it reviews certain False Claims Act (FCA) whistleblower cases, and organizations participating in federally funded benefits programs should take notice. A recently announced...more
A recent decision from a California federal court addresses a more straightforward flavor of wiretapping claims than those that have caused a drastic increase in consumer privacy litigation. Below, we discuss: (1) the...more
In Perlmutter v. Federal Ins. Co., ___ So.3d ___ (Fla., June 11, 2026), the Supreme Court of Florida unanimously rejected the decision of the Florida 4th District Court of Appeal In Perlmutter v. Federal Ins. Co., 376 So.3d...more
On June 9, 2026, the Decree amending, supplementing, and repealing several provisions of the Federal Administrative Litigation Law (Ley Federal de Procedimiento Contencioso Administrativo, or LFPCA) was published in Mexico’s...more