News & Analysis as of

Debt Collection Spokeo v Robins

Hudson Cook, LLP

Technical Violations of State Collection Practices Laws Can Lead to Class Action Liability

Hudson Cook, LLP on

If you are reading this article, you are likely aware that a creditor collecting its own debts in its own name is not a "debt collector" under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") or its implementing rule,...more

Cozen O'Connor

Neither Confusion nor Expense of Retaining Counsel Sufficient for Article III Standing in FDCPA Case

Cozen O'Connor on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins was a game-changer. That decision single-handedly raised the bar for a plaintiff alleging a violation of a consumer protection statute such as the Fair Credit...more

Cozen O'Connor

Federal Court Standing Decision May Spark Trend In Consumer Protection Action Filings In State Court

Cozen O'Connor on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins was a game-changer. That decision single-handedly raised the bar for a plaintiff alleging a violation of a consumer protection statute such as the Fair Credit...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Tenth Circuit Applies TransUnion v. Ramirez To Find Standing In Single-Call Debt Collection Case

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent TransUnion v. Ramirez decision on Article III standing was discussed at length and applied by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Lupia v. Medicredit, Inc., --- F. 4th ---, 2021 WL 3627103...more

Goodwin

Seventh Circuit Yet Again Reaffirms Spokeo Principle That Bare FDCPA Violation Is Not Actionable

Goodwin on

On May 14, 2021, the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued a decision reaffirming the rule from “a slew of cases” that, without injury, a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) claim alleging a bare...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Financial...

Consumer Law Hinsights – April 2021

Consumer Law Hinsights is a monthly compilation of nationwide consumer protection cases of interest to financial services and accounts receivable management companies. Eleventh Circuit Delivers Surprising Decision on Use...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Article III Standing in FDCPA Class Actions: The Seventh Circuit Issues a Series of Decisions

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On Monday and Tuesday of this week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a series of decisions addressing the Article III standing of consumer plaintiffs alleging violations of the Fair Debt...more

King & Spalding

Eleventh Circuit Rejects Standing in FDCPA Case Where Plaintiffs Received Allegedly Misleading Letters, But Were Not Misled

King & Spalding on

On July 6, the Eleventh Circuit held that two recipients of debt collection letters lacked Article III standing to pursue claims against a debt collection agency under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). ...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Federal Circuit Courts’ Differing Interpretations of Scope and Application of Article III Standing after Spokeo Leaves Defendants...

McGuireWoods LLP on

In Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016), the Supreme Court held that Article III requires plaintiffs to establish a “concrete and particularized” injury-in-fact, “even in the context of a statutory violation.” ...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Sixth and Ninth Circuits Issue Decisions Applying Spokeo to FDCPA and FCRA Claims

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Earlier this month, in Buchholz v. Meyer Njus Tanick, P.A., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision that a plaintiff who alleged that the defendant had violated the Fair Debt...more

Holland & Knight LLP

No Harm, No Foul: Seventh Circuit Again Demands Concrete Harm in FDCPA Cases

Holland & Knight LLP on

Whether there is a connection to the near end of another exciting National Basketball Association season is unknown, but in a recent ruling issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court began its...more

K&L Gates LLP

Follow the Leader: The Sixth Circuit Applies Spokeo, Ruling That Certain Statutory Violations May, Without More, Establish Article...

K&L Gates LLP on

A panel of the Sixth Circuit recently concluded that a certain alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) by itself constitutes a concrete injury-in-fact establishing Article III standing. ...more

BCLP

Fair Debt Collection – In Writing, and We Mean It

BCLP on

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals continues to contribute to the case law defining which violations of procedural statutes constitute an injury-in-fact under Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 1540, 1547, 194...more

Balch & Bingham LLP

Sixth Circuit Shuts Down FDCPA Claim under Spokeo

Balch & Bingham LLP on

In Hagy v. Demers & Adams, the Sixth Circuit looked to Spokeo, Inc. v. Robbins to hold that not all inaccuracies cause real harm sufficient to confer standing to bring suit under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act...more

Goodwin

Applying Spokeo, 6th Circuit Dismisses FDCPA Suit

Goodwin on

On February 16, 2018, the 6th Circuit, in Hagy v. Demers & Adams (882 F.3d 616 (6th Cir. Feb. 16, 2018)), found that a former borrower did not have standing to assert a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act...more

Goodwin

Financial Services Weekly News - August 2017 #2

Goodwin on

Editor's Note - In This Issue. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released prototypes of “Know Before You Owe” overdraft disclosure forms and provided an updated rulemaking agenda for 2017; the Federal Reserve...more

Goodwin

Financial Services Weekly News - June 2017 #2

Goodwin on

Editor's Note - Financial Regulatory Reform Picks Up Speed. The Trump administration, which views burdensome and costly regulation as a significant impediment to lending and economic growth, has consistently maintained...more

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,...

District Court Serves as a Reminder of the Limitations of Spokeo

A district court out of Missouri has served up a reminder as to the limitations of a motion to dismiss based upon subject matter jurisdiction. In May v. Consumer Adjustment Co., the consumer filed an FDCPA complaint is state...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

Mere Receipt Of A Collection Letter – Without More – Does Not Give Standing to Sue

The District of New Jersey, in Benali v. AFNI, granted summary judgment to creditor on Spokeo grounds, denied consumer’s motion for summary judgment and denied consumer’s class certification as moot in a claim involving a...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Envelope’s Display of Barcode With Embedded Account Number Does Not Violate FDCPA, Court Rules

Ballard Spahr LLP on

A federal district court in Florida has ruled that a debt collector did not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by sending a collection letter in an envelope that allegedly revealed a barcode in which the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

California Federal Court Dismisses TCPA Claims for Lack of Article III Standing

Ballard Spahr LLP on

A plaintiff did not have Article III standing to assert claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) for alleged autodialed calls made to her without her consent, a California federal district court recently...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Where’s the (TCPA) Harm in That?

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. Robins that plaintiffs must allege a concrete and particularized injury to meet Article III standing requirements, federal district courts across the country are...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Third Circuit Remands "Meaningful Attorney Involvement" Decision

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has vacated the district court's decision in Bock v. Pressler & Pressler, LLP in which the district court ruled that a debt collection law firm violated the Fair Debt Collection...more

Balch & Bingham LLP

Eleventh Circuit: Failure to Provide Debtor with FDCPA-Required Disclosures Constitutes Injury-in-Fact to Confer Standing

Balch & Bingham LLP on

In an unpublished opinion, the Eleventh Circuit applied the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. ___, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016) and held that a debtor who allegedly did not receive certain...more

Burr & Forman

Third Circuit Remands “Meaningful Attorney Review” FDCPA Decision with Instruction to Consider Article III Standing Under Spokeo,...

Burr & Forman on

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (U.S. May 16, 2016), continues to have a substantial impact on federal courts, especially with respect to alleged statutory violations of the Fair Debt...more

30 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide