News & Analysis as of

Denial of Benefits Supreme Court of the United States

Jackson Lewis P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court: Courts Can Review Railroad Retirement Board’s Refusal To Reopen Claims

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that federal courts can review decisions by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board denying claimants’ requests to reopen prior benefits denials. Salinas v. U.S. R.R. Ret. Bd.,...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board

On February 3, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, No. 19–199, holding that a refusal by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board to reopen a prior benefits determination is...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

The United States Supreme Court Granted Review in 3 Cases This Past Week

Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass’n, No. 18-540. Most states have enacted legislation regulating “pharmacy benefit managers”— businesses that act as middlemen between health insurers and pharmacies, earning...more

Polsinelli

CMS Outlines New Standard for Challenging Medicare Payment Denials, Echoing Brand Memo on Force of Sub-Regulatory Guidance

Polsinelli on

On October 31, 2019, the Office of General Counsel for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued an important memo from Kelly M. Cleary, CMS Chief Legal Officer, and Brenna E. Jenny, Deputy General...more

BCLP

U.S. Supreme Court Limits Judicial Deference To Administrative Agency Interpretation of Their Own Ambiguous Rules

BCLP on

On June 26, 2019, the United States Supreme Court declined to overturn the Auer doctrine, leaving in place, for now, judicial deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations. Kisor v. Wilkie, 2019 WL 2605554,...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Keeps Auer, but Dilutes Its Power

On June 26, 2019, in Kisor v. Wilkie, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to overrule its prior decisions in Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997) and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410 (1945). These...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

State tax implications of US Supreme Court’s limitation of judicial deference to agency interpretations of their own regulations

On June 26, 2019, the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Kisor v. Wilkie. The Court declined to overturn Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co, but reinforced the limits on the applicability of the...more

Franczek P.C.

Supreme Court Issues Two Decisions With Implications for Public Schools

Franczek P.C. on

The Supreme Court closed out its current term this week, issuing decisions in two cases with important implications for public schools. In Kisor v. Wilkie, issued yesterday, a surprising majority of the Court (the liberal...more

WilmerHale

A Divided Supreme Court Narrowly Upholds Auer Deference

WilmerHale on

On June 26, 2019, the US Supreme Court issued a decision in Kisor v. Wilkie. The question presented in Kisor was whether to overrule the Court’s prior decisions in Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997), and Bowles v. Seminole...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Survival of the deference - Auer deference evolves in Kisor v. Wilkie

On June 26, 2019, the US Supreme Court handed down a long-awaited decision in Kisor v. Wilkie, a case that challenged Auer deference, a long-standing doctrine of administrative agency law that requires courts interpreting...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS continues judicial deference to agency interpretations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In a decision issued on Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Kisor v. Wilkie, declined to overrule a line of cases instructing courts to defer to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation, a doctrine sometimes...more

Fisher Phillips

Fox (Mostly) Remains In The Henhouse: SCOTUS Says Agencies (Sort Of) Know Best

Fisher Phillips on

By a 9-0 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that by and large, the courts should continue deferring to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own ambiguous regulations, leaving a good deal of power in the...more

Cooley LLP

Blog: The “greatest judicial power grab since Marbury v. Madison”? SCOTUS considers Kisor v. Wilkie

Cooley LLP on

As noted in this PubCo post, SCOTUS recently heard oral argument in Kisor v. Wilkie, a case involving the interpretation of a regulation issued by the Department of Veteran’s Affairs. In Kisor, a Vietnam vet, suffering from...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS hears oral argument in case involving court deference to agency interpretations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

At the end of last month, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kisor v. Wilkie, a case in which the question before the Court is whether it should overrule a line of cases instructing courts to defer to an agency’s...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Biestek v. Berryhill

On April 1, 2019, the Supreme Court decided Biestek v. Berryhill, No. 17-1184, holding that a Social Security Administration (SSA) vocational expert’s opinion may constitute “substantial evidence” supporting an administrative...more

Nossaman LLP

Supreme Court Hears Auer Deference Case

Nossaman LLP on

On March 27, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Kisor v. Wilkie (No. 18-15), focusing on whether Auer deference should be overruled. ...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Culbertson v. Berryhill

On January 8, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Culbertson v. Berryhill, No. 17-773, holding that the Social Security Act permits an attorney fee award greater than 25 percent of the claimant’s past-due...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court To Reconsider ‘Auer’ Deference

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Supreme Court agreed this week to reconsider a key precedent of administrative law that tells judges to defer to an agency’s interpretation of its own ambiguous regulation, taking up a challenge...more

Nossaman LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Will Revisit Auer Deference

Nossaman LLP on

On December, 10, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari in Kisor v. Wilkie (No. 18-15), which raises the issue of whether Auer deference should be overruled. ...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Health Update - July 2016

The Vulnerability of Healthcare Information - According to a report the Brookings Institute issued in May 2016, 23% of all data breaches occur in the healthcare industry. Nearly 90% of healthcare organizations had some...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Judge Garland’s ERISA Jurisprudence Reflects His Methodical and Moderate Reputation

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

With President Obama’s recent nomination of Judge Merrick B. Garland of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to the U.S. Supreme Court, we thought our loyal readers would be interested to learn a little about Judge...more

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive...

Despite Windsor, Federal Court Rejects Challenge to a Self-Insured ERISA Health Plan’s Denial of Coverage for Same-Sex Spouses

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in US v. Windsor, the requirement that an ERISA health plan provide health coverage for same-sex spouses has often hinged on whether an employee benefit plan was insured or...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court to Review Statute of Limitations for Denial of ERISA Claims

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On Tuesday, October 15, 2013, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case likely to have wide-ranging consequences for employers who offer employee benefit plans under Employee Retirement Income Security...more

23 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide