News & Analysis as of

Disability Benefits Disability

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five ERISA Litigation Highlights - September 2024

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five discusses cases addressing the effect of continuing to receive benefits during the period of alleged disability, reliance on an employer’s records in making a disability determination, the...more

Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.

Impairment-Related Work Expenses and Disability Benefits

Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are two federal disability benefits programs that provide monetary assistance for people with disabilities. Both programs allow recipients who...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five ERISA Litigation Highlights - June 2024

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five explores recent decisions with issues spanning physician power of attorney to preexisting exclusions and the fiduciary duty of an insurance company....more

Marshall Dennehey

Act 111 is Not an Unconstitutional Special Law Regulating Labor, and an IRE Physician’s Evaluation is Competent to Support a...

Marshall Dennehey on

Stephen Conrad v. Department of Transportation (WCAB); No. 557 C.D. 2022; filed Feb. 26, 2024; Judge McCullough - The claimant underwent an Impairment Rating Evaluation (IRE) on September 20, 2011, following a July 5, 2005,...more

Carlton Fields

Litigation Lineup: Recent Decisions in Life and Disability Insurance Run into Policy Lapse, COVID-19, and Conflict of Interest...

Carlton Fields on

Life Policy Lapse Shortly Before Insured’s Death - In Simon v. USAA Life Insurance Co. (Mar. 29, 2024), the insurer denied death benefits under a term life insurance policy, which had lapsed for nonpayment of premium two...more

Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires &...

New York Workers' Compensation Ruling Roundup - March 2024

On March 21, the 3rd Department delivered four new rulings. Learn more below. Kaminski v. Integrated Structures, CV-22-2295 (3rd Dept. 3/21/24) - The Appellate Division affirmed the Board’s decision to deny a carrier’s 2nd...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five ERISA Litigation Highlights - March 2024

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five covers cases relating to an alleged conflict of interest leading to discovery, two courts’ opposite treatments of subjective pain complaints, a decision that claims of fraud and misrepresentation were...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five ERISA Litigation Highlights - November 2023

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five covers cases relating to petitions for attorneys’ fees, unpersuasive self-reported evidence of disability, and a dilatory attempt to augment the administrative record....more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five ERISA Litigation Highlights - September 2023

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five explores decisions regarding the timeliness of appeals, the support necessary to sustain an LTD termination decision, a court’s discretion to credit and discredit expert opinions, the circumstances...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five ERISA Litigation Highlights - August 2023

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five addresses two cases involving disability claims that touch on Covid-19, a Circuit Court ruling for an insurer, a district court ruling that a 20-year-old regulatory settlement precluded an insurer...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five Current ERISA Litigation Highlights - June 2023

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five covers cases relating to a plaintiff’s attempts to seal a complaint seeking disability benefits, an administrator’s uncommunicated decision to discontinue its investigation into certain medical...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

NC Court of Appeals Sets Standard for Extended Benefits in Sturdivant v. NC Department of Public Safety – What’s Next?

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

In Sturdivant v. NC Department of Public Safety (No. COA22-421), the North Carolina Court of Appeals affirms Full Commission Opinion and Award denying extended benefits under N.C.G.S. 97-29 (c)...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five Current ERISA Litigation Highlights - January 2023

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five covers cases relating to discovery in ERISA benefits cases, an appellate court strictly interpreting ERISA regulatory deadlines, a district court authorizing an ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claim...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

Salary Continuation or Temporary Total Compensation, which should I choose?

Bricker Graydon LLP on

​​​​​​​An employee is injured on the job and cannot immediately return to work. Whether to offer salary continuation or permit temporary total disability compensation to be paid under the workers’ compensation claim is a...more

Ruder Ware

Local Social Security Administration Offices Open for Business Again

Ruder Ware on

Do you prefer face-to-face meetings? Do you struggle getting through a phone tree or finding what you need online? Many of our clients receive Social Security Retirement benefits, Social Security Disability benefits, and...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Standard for Remanding ERISA Dispute to Plan Administrator

In Newsom v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., the Fifth Circuit clarified when it is appropriate for a district court to remand an ERISA dispute to a plan administrator for development of a merits record. 26 F.4th 329 (5th...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five Current ERISA Litigation Highlights - March 2022

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five explores recent decisions tackling a myriad of issues, including: (1) whether reclassification of a claimant’s health status constitutes an adverse benefit determination; (2) whether remand is the...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - The LHD/ERISA Advisor

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Court Rules LTD Benefits Properly Terminated After Plaintiff Failed to Undergo Recommended Surgery for...

In Hall v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117331 (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2021), a California district court held that an ERISA claim administrator properly terminated long-term disability (LTD) benefits after the...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five Current ERISA Litigation Highlights - September 2021

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five covers cases relating to: (1) whether a state statute prohibiting discretionary authority in disability benefit plans applies to non-state residents; (2) how a court may weigh multiple denials and...more

Genova Burns LLC

NJ Supreme Court Strikes Adverse Employment Action Requirement in Failure to Accommodate Claims

Genova Burns LLC on

On June 8, 2021, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Richter v. Oakland Board of Education affirmed the Appellate Division’s ruling that an employee asserting a failure to accommodate claim does not have to separately establish...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - The LHD/ERISA Advisor

The LHD/ERISA Advisor – June 2021: Citing Plan Ambiguity, Tenth Circuit Rules Becoming Disabled After Receiving Notice of...

In Carlile v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 988 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 2021), the Tenth Circuit found the term "active" full-time employee ambiguous and awarded disability benefits to an employee who became disabled after...more

Littler

Disability Benefits Policy Language Warrants Arbitrary and Capricious Standard of Review Despite Enactment of Anti-Discretionary...

Littler on

A federal court in New Jersey recently applied the arbitrary and capricious standard of review for a denial of benefits claim despite the enactment of an anti-discretionary statute in Minnesota, which governed the benefit...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The Friday Five: Five Current ERISA Litigation Highlights – March 2021

Saul Ewing LLP on

This month’s Friday Five discusses cases that address the meaning of “active, full-time employee,” whether remand is required where an improper standard of review was applied, the standard for capacity in reference to a...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court: Courts Can Review Railroad Retirement Board’s Refusal To Reopen Claims

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that federal courts can review decisions by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board denying claimants’ requests to reopen prior benefits denials. Salinas v. U.S. R.R. Ret. Bd.,...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board

On February 3, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, No. 19–199, holding that a refusal by the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board to reopen a prior benefits determination is...more

102 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide