News & Analysis as of

Employer Liability Issues State Labor Laws Standing

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

PAGA Paraphrased – Osuna v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The Second District Court of Appeal held that, under the pre-reform PAGA statute, an individual employee need not have been employed or experienced a Labor Code violation during the one-year PAGA limitations period to have...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

California Court of Appeal Rejects "Headless" PAGA Claims in Williams v. Alacrity Solutions Group

In a significant development for California employers, the Court of Appeal in Williams v. Alacrity Solutions Group, LLC recently affirmed the dismissal of a Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) claim brought solely on...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

PAGA Paraphrased — Rodriguez v. Lawrence Equip., Inc.

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The Second District again held that issue preclusion barred plaintiff’s PAGA claim because he failed to establish any violation of the Labor Code and arbitral findings have a preclusive effect on a plaintiff’s standing in a...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Second Circuit Provides Lifeline to Employers Facing WTPA Claims in Federal Court

Epstein Becker & Green on

In Guthrie v. Rainbow Fencing Inc., 113 F.4th 300 (2d Cir. 2024), the Second Circuit weighed in on a brewing dispute among New York district courts as to whether (and how) a plaintiff’s allegations may establish Article III...more

FordHarrison

California Significantly Reforms Private Attorney's General Act

FordHarrison on

Executive Summary: On July 1, 2024, the Governor of California signed two pieces of legislation that significantly amended the Private Attorney’s General Act (“PAGA”), a statute which allows an employee, on behalf of the...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

PAGA Paraphrased – AB 2288 and SB 92

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

AB 2288 and SB 92 collectively amount to the most substantive changes ever to be seen to PAGA. The changes include numerous pro-employer provisions which seek to address longstanding concerns such as standing, penalties, and...more

Payne & Fears

PAGA Standing Questions Already Being Answered (by the Court of Appeal)

Payne & Fears on

Recent developments in the California Court of Appeal could impact pending or future Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) litigation. Though many employers anxiously await a decision in the pending California Supreme Court...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Case Summaries: September, October, and November 2022

Payne & Fears on

Summary - Where an employer can and does track the exact time in minutes that its employees work each shift, and those records show that employees were not paid for all the time they worked, neutral time rounding is not a...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Court of Appeal Blazes 'Middle Ground' Approach to PAGA Intervention

On August 18, 2022, the California Court of Appeal (Fifth District) decided Porras v. Chipotle Servs., LLC, No. F081113, 2022 WL 3499646, rejecting a former employee’s attempt to vacate a $4.9 million Private Attorneys...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

This Week At The Ninth: Robocalls and Retaliation

This week, the Court addresses the constitutionality of a nearly $1 billion statutory damages award under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and revives a California state law whistleblower claim. The Court...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

California Trial Courts Continue To Interpret Johnson v. Maxim Healthcare Narrowly When Applying PAGA’s One-Year Statute of...

Last year, the California Court of Appeal raised eyebrows by ruling that a plaintiff could pursue a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claim for alleged violations of Labor Code Section 432.5, even though the statute of...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

California Supreme Court May Address Questions Left from Viking River Cruises in 2023

On July 20, 2022, the California Supreme Court granted review in Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Cal. Ct. App. Case No. G059860, which indicates that it may intend to address the questions of state law addressed by the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Ninth Circuit Holds That Nonparty Aggrieved Employee Has No Standing to Challenge PAGA Settlement

On February 11, 2022, the 9th Circuit issued its decision in Saucillo v. Peck, — F.4th —, 2022 WL 414692 (9th Cir. 2022), holding among other things that a nonparty aggrieved employee does not have standing in federal court...more

K&L Gates LLP

The Essentials - California Employment Law Update

K&L Gates LLP on

Near the end of 2021, a flurry of decisions that significantly affect employers facing and settling Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) lawsuits were published. The first two decisions, Uribe v. Crown Building Maintenance...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

This Week at The Ninth: Abatement and Discharge

This week, the Court considered the retroactivity of California’s Proposition 22—which designates “app-based drivers” as independent contractors under certain conditions—and addressed the requirements for Clean Water Act...more

Stokes Wagner

California Labor Code Section 226: Clarifications on Compliance with Wage Statement Overtime Listings

Stokes Wagner on

Anyone who has considered filing a petition for writ of mandate from a superior court ruling knows the odds are not in favor of the court granted this extraordinary relief. Apart from clear error, the requirement of showing...more

Payne & Fears

Ninth Circuit Restricts Scope of PAGA Claims in Federal Court and Clarifies California Wage Statement Requirements

Payne & Fears on

On May 28, 2021, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed Walmart a groundbreaking win in a wage-and-hour class and California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA") action.  Reversing a nearly $102 million...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide