News & Analysis as of

Hiring & Firing › No-Poaching › Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

Hiring & Firing refers to the process of recruiting, interviewing and offering employment and the process of evaluating performance and dismissing employees. Hiring & Firing is a highly regulated area and... more +
Hiring & Firing refers to the process of recruiting, interviewing and offering employment and the process of evaluating performance and dismissing employees. Hiring & Firing is a highly regulated area and can create tremendous liability for employers who fail to properly adhere to acceptable employment practices. Some of the potential pitfalls in this area stem from discriminatory hiring practices, improper performance evaluations, and retaliatory firings.  less -
McCarter & English, LLP

Antitrust Guidelines for Worker-Related Business Practices: How to Stay on the Right Side of Antitrust Hiring Laws During the...

McCarter & English, LLP on

The Department of Justice Antitrust Division (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (together, the Agencies) issued Antitrust Guidelines for Business Activities Affecting Workers (2025 Guidelines) in January. The 2025...more

WilmerHale

Balancing Act: Navigating Nuances in Labor Market Enforcement

WilmerHale on

In recent years, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) have significantly ramped up enforcement efforts in labor markets. This article delves into two key enforcement...more

Littler

Federal and State Authorities Bring Antitrust Enforcement to the Contingent Workforce Sector

Littler on

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and now state attorneys general, have set their sights on staffing companies in their evolving efforts to examine labor markets through an antitrust lens....more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Court Dismisses DOJ’s Latest “No-Poach” Case Before Jury Deliberations

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

In another blow to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) efforts to criminalize “no-poach” and “wage-fixing” agreements, a federal judge terminated the DOJ’s latest “no-poach” case mid-trial before jury deliberations....more

Frantz Ward LLP

Unlocking the Handcuffs: Department of Justice Obtains Guilty Plea in “No-Poach” Hiring Agreement Case

Frantz Ward LLP on

The Department of Justice has claimed its first victory in attacking “no-poach” agreements after a Nevada staffing company pled guilty and was sentenced to pay $134,000.  The case arose out of a concerted effort by the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

DOJ Secures First Win in Criminal No Poach Action

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On October 27, 2022, VDA OC, LLC, (VDA) a Nevada health care staffing company, pleaded guilty to participating in a conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition for the services of school nurses. According to the plea,...more

Epstein Becker & Green

FTC Reaches Agreement with NLRB to Further Protect Labor Markets

Epstein Becker & Green on

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice have prioritized the protection of labor markets. From scrutinizing “no-poach” agreements and restrictive covenants to analyzing the impact of mergers and...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Employee Talent Wars Gain Unprecedented Ammunition from Changing Antitrust Landscape

Holland & Knight LLP on

The current labor market is fraught with challenges for employers. In the wake of the COVID-19 market disruptions, the demand for employees, especially for experienced or highly trained employees, far exceeds the supply....more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

DOJ's Aggressive Pursuit of 'No Poachers'

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

On January 28, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado declined to dismiss a criminal antitrust indictment alleging a dialysis operator, DaVita Inc. (“DaVita”), and its former CEO colluded with...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Update on DOJ “No-Poach” and “Wage-Fixing” Criminal Antitrust Prosecutions

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

It has been nearly a year since the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division (DOJ) made good on its promise to criminally charge companies that agree not to solicit each other's employees in so-called "no-poach"...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Prominent Services Contractors Ensnared in No-Poach Class Action

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

For many federal government contractors, their skilled and experienced workforce may be their most valuable asset. A recent “ice breaker” settlement of a class action lawsuit, however, demonstrates the wrong way to protect...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Strikes Down a No-Hire Agreement as an Unreasonable Restraint on Trade

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

Recently, in Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. v. Beemac Trucking, LLC, No. 31 WAP 2019, — A.3d –, 2021 WL 1676399 (Apr. 29, 2021), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that a no-hire provision that was ancillary to a...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Chamber of Commerce Questions the Criminality of Employee No-Poach Agreements

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Whether employee no-poach agreements are illegal per se is being tested in a criminal case, U.S. v. Surgical Care Affiliates LLC et al., drawing the attention of many interested parties, including the United States Chamber of...more

The Volkov Law Group

Antitrust Division Charges Health Care Staffing Company with Criminal Wage-Fixing and No-Poaching Agreement

The Volkov Law Group on

The Justice Department’s Antitrust Division is pushing criminal enforcement against companies for illegal wage-fixing among competitors in the hiring market. ...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Antitrust In The Labor Market

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

That which is old is new again. The U.S. Department of Justice and plaintiffs’ lawyers are taking aim at non-solicitation agreements restricting mobility of labor. This isn’t something employers usually think about. ...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

DOJ Brings First Criminal Challenges to Wage-Fixing and No-Poach Agreements

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

More than four years after the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) jointly released the Antitrust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals in 2016 (Antitrust Guidance), the DOJ has...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

DOJ’s First Criminal Charges for Wage-Fixing and No-Poach Labor Agreements: 6 Key Takeaways

Latham & Watkins LLP on

With increased scrutiny of anticompetitive conduct in labor markets, companies need to adopt proactive compliance efforts to avoid prosecution. The US Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) Antitrust Division recently announced...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

DOJ Brings First Criminal “No-Poach” and “Wage-Fixing” Prosecutions; New Focus on Labor Market Prosecutions

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

What happened? The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) announced that, on January 5, 2021, a federal grand jury returned a two-count indictment charging Surgical Care Affiliates LLC and its related entity...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Competitor "No Poach Agreements" Can Lead to Criminal Prosecutions, Fines and Jail Time

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

“No poach” agreements -- agreements between two or more competitors that neither will recruit or hire the other’s employees – have long been held to violate the antitrust laws.  The United States Justice Department and...more

The Volkov Law Group

DOJ’s Antitrust Division Launches Two Criminal Prosecutions of Illegal No-Poach and Wage-Fixing Agreements

The Volkov Law Group on

The Antitrust Division has warned companies that it would bring criminal indictments against companies that enter into illegal no-poach or wage-fixing agreements.  The Antitrust Division has now put its money where its mouth...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

DOJ Brings First Criminal “No Poach” and “Wage-Fixing” Antitrust Prosecutions

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

The U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division (DOJ) has made good on a promise it made over four years ago to criminally charge companies that agree not to solicit each other's employees in so-called "no poach"...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

DOJ And FTC Warn Employers That Antitrust Laws Still Apply Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On April 13, the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Competition and the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division (the Agencies) issued a joint statement reiterating that antitrust laws protect U.S. labor markets even...more

BakerHostetler

Demystifying the Antitrust Implications of Franchise No-Poach Agreements

BakerHostetler on

In 2016, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) jointly issued “Antitrust Guidance to Human Resource Professionals,” addressing employee no-poach agreements – agreements between two or more...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

As Treatment of No-Poach Agreements Evolves, DOJ To Examine Antitrust in Labor Markets

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

Antitrust treatment of no-poach agreements continues to evolve as private cases progress, state attorneys general ramp up enforcement efforts and federal regulators further contemplate the legality of no-poach agreements....more

A&O Shearman

Key Antitrust Enforcement Trends — 2019 Antitrust Annual Report

A&O Shearman on

Welcome to the 2019 Shearman & Sterling Antitrust Annual Report. Our seventh edition focuses on the contrasting use by regulators of antitrust laws with respect to the FANGs, and how antitrust is being enforced in the U.S....more

76 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide